Vina Ernest R, Youk Ada O, Quinones Cristian, Kwoh C Kent, Ibrahim Said A, Hausmann Leslie R M
College of Medicine and University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2021 Sep;3(9):660-667. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11307. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
To evaluate race and gender variations in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use for knee osteoarthritis (OA) (unadjusted and adjusted for demographic and clinical factors).
A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data was conducted. The sample included Veterans Affairs patients 50 years of age or older with symptomatic knee OA. Current use of various CAM therapies was assessed at baseline. Logistic regression models were used to compare race and gender differences in the use of specific CAMs.
The sample included 517 participants (52.2% identified as African American [AA]; 27.1% identified as female). After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, AA participants, compared with white participants, were less likely to use joint supplements (odds ratio [OR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.90]); yoga, tai chi, or pilates (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.19-0.77); and chiropractic care (OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-1.00). However, they were more likely to participate in spiritual activities (OR: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.39-2.94). Women, compared with men, were more likely to use herbs (OR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.41-4.14); yoga, tai chi, or pilates (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.04-4.19); acupuncture, acupressure, or massage (OR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.28-4.67); and spiritual activities (OR: 1.68; 95% CI: 1.09-2.60). The interactive effects of race and gender were significant in the use of herbs (P = 0.008); yoga, tai chi, or pilates (P = 0.011); acupuncture, acupressure or massage (P = 0.038); and spiritual activities (P < 0.001).
There are race and gender differences in the use of various CAMs for OA. As benefits and limitations of CAM therapies vary, clinicians must be aware of these differences.
评估在使用补充和替代医学(CAM)治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)方面的种族和性别差异(未调整以及调整人口统计学和临床因素后)。
对横断面数据进行二次分析。样本包括50岁及以上有症状膝关节OA的退伍军人事务部患者。在基线时评估各种CAM疗法的当前使用情况。使用逻辑回归模型比较特定CAM使用方面的种族和性别差异。
样本包括517名参与者(52.2%被认定为非裔美国人[AA];27.1%被认定为女性)。在调整人口统计学和临床因素后,与白人参与者相比,AA参与者使用关节补充剂的可能性较小(优势比[OR]:0.53;95%置信区间[CI],0.31 - 0.90);使用瑜伽、太极或普拉提的可能性较小(OR:0.39;95% CI:0.19 - 0.77);接受脊椎按摩治疗的可能性较小(OR:0.51;95% CI:0.26 - 1.00)。然而,他们参与精神活动的可能性更大(OR:2.02;95% CI:1.39 - 2.94)。与男性相比,女性更有可能使用草药(OR:2.42;95% CI:1.41 - 4.14);使用瑜伽、太极或普拉提(OR:2.09;95% CI:1.04 - 4.19);接受针灸、指压或按摩(OR:2.45;95% CI:1.28 - 4.67);以及参与精神活动(OR:1.68;95% CI:1.09 - 2.60)。种族和性别的交互作用在使用草药(P = 0.008);瑜伽、太极或普拉提(P = 0.011);针灸、指压或按摩(P = 0.038);以及精神活动(P < 0.001)方面具有显著性。
在使用各种CAM治疗OA方面存在种族和性别差异。由于CAM疗法的益处和局限性各不相同,临床医生必须了解这些差异。