Hywel Dda University Health Board, Carmarthenshire, UK
College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):e042591. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042591.
To measure work-related burnout in all groups of health service staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify factors associated with work-related burnout.
Cross-sectional staff survey.
All staff grades and types across primary and secondary care in a single National Health Service organisation.
257 staff members completed the survey, 251 had a work-related burnout score and 239 records were used in the regression analysis. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Work-related burnout as measured by the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; (2) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through a multiple linear regression model; and (3) factors associated with work-related burnout identified through thematic analysis of free text responses.
After adjusting for other covariates (including age, sex, job, being able to take breaks and COVID-19 knowledge), we observed meaningful changes in work-related burnout associated with having different COVID-19 roles (p=0.03), differences in the ability to rest and recover during breaks (p<0.01) and having personal protective equipment concerns (p=0.04). Thematic analysis of the free text comments also linked burnout to changes in workload and responsibility and to a lack of control through redeployment and working patterns. Reduction in non-COVID-19 services has resulted in some members of staff feeling underutilised, with feelings of inequality in workload.
Our analyses support anecdotal reports of staff struggling with the additional pressures brought on by COVID-19. All three of the factors we found to be associated with work-related burnout are modifiable and hence their effects can be mitigated. When we next find ourselves in extraordinary times the ordinary considerations of rest and protection and monitoring of the impact of new roles will be more important than ever.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,测量所有卫生服务人员群体的工作相关倦怠情况,并确定与工作相关倦怠相关的因素。
横断面工作人员调查。
单一国家卫生服务组织中的初级和二级保健所有职等和类型的工作人员。
257 名工作人员完成了调查,251 名工作人员有工作相关倦怠评分,239 份记录用于回归分析。
(1)使用哥本哈根倦怠量表测量的工作相关倦怠;(2)通过多元线性回归模型确定的与工作相关倦怠相关的因素;(3)通过自由文本回复的主题分析确定的与工作相关倦怠相关的因素。
在调整了其他协变量(包括年龄、性别、工作、能否休息以及对 COVID-19 的了解)后,我们观察到与不同 COVID-19 角色相关的工作相关倦怠发生了有意义的变化(p=0.03)、休息和恢复期间休息能力的差异(p<0.01)以及对个人防护设备的关注(p=0.04)。对自由文本评论的主题分析还将倦怠与工作量和责任的变化以及通过重新部署和工作模式缺乏控制联系起来。非 COVID-19 服务的减少导致一些员工感到未充分利用,工作量不平等。
我们的分析支持了工作人员因 COVID-19 带来的额外压力而感到困难的传闻报道。我们发现与工作相关倦怠相关的三个因素都是可改变的,因此可以减轻其影响。当我们下次发现自己处于特殊时期时,休息、保护和监测新角色影响的普通考虑将比以往任何时候都更加重要。