• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用英国生物银行对肾癌风险预测模型进行验证和公共卫生建模。

Validation and public health modelling of risk prediction models for kidney cancer using the UK Biobank.

作者信息

Harrison Hannah, Pennells Lisa, Wood Angela, Rossi Sabrina H, Stewart Grant D, Griffin Simon J, Usher-Smith Juliet A

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2022 Apr;129(4):498-511. doi: 10.1111/bju.15598. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1111/bju.15598
PMID:34538014
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To externally validate risk models for the detection of kidney cancer, as early detection of kidney cancer improves survival and stratifying the population using risk models could enable an individually tailored screening programme.

METHODS

We validated the performance of 30 existing phenotypic models predicting the risk of kidney cancer in the UK Biobank cohort (n = 450 687). We compared the discrimination and calibration of models for men, women, and a mixed-sex cohort. Population level data were used to estimate model performance in a screening scenario for a range of risk thresholds (6-year risk: 0.1-1.0%).

RESULTS

In all, 10 models had reasonable discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve >0.60), although some had poor calibration. Modelling demonstrated similar performance of the best models over a range of thresholds. The models showed an improvement in ability to identify cases compared to age- and sex-based screening. All the models performed less well in women than men.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first comprehensive external validation of risk models for kidney cancer. The best-performing models are better at identifying individuals at high risk of kidney cancer than age and sex alone; however, the benefits are relatively small. Feasibility studies are required to determine applicability to a screening programme.

摘要

目的

对用于检测肾癌的风险模型进行外部验证,因为早期发现肾癌可提高生存率,并且使用风险模型对人群进行分层能够制定个性化的筛查方案。

方法

我们在英国生物银行队列(n = 450687)中验证了30个现代表型模型预测肾癌风险的性能。我们比较了男性、女性以及混合性别队列模型的区分度和校准情况。使用人群水平数据来估计一系列风险阈值(6年风险:0.1 - 1.0%)筛查场景下的模型性能。

结果

总体而言,10个模型具有合理的区分度(受试者操作特征曲线下面积>0.60),尽管有些模型校准不佳。建模表明,在一系列阈值范围内,最佳模型的性能相似。与基于年龄和性别的筛查相比,这些模型在识别病例的能力上有所提高。所有模型在女性中的表现均不如男性。

结论

本研究是对肾癌风险模型的首次全面外部验证。表现最佳的模型在识别肾癌高危个体方面比仅依靠年龄和性别更具优势;然而,优势相对较小。需要进行可行性研究以确定其在筛查方案中的适用性。

相似文献

1
Validation and public health modelling of risk prediction models for kidney cancer using the UK Biobank.使用英国生物银行对肾癌风险预测模型进行验证和公共卫生建模。
BJU Int. 2022 Apr;129(4):498-511. doi: 10.1111/bju.15598. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
External validation of risk prediction models for incident colorectal cancer using UK Biobank.利用英国生物库对结直肠癌发病风险预测模型进行外部验证。
Br J Cancer. 2018 Mar 6;118(5):750-759. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.463. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
3
Estimating the Effectiveness of Kidney Cancer Screening Within Lung Cancer Screening Programmes: A Validation in UK Biobank.在肺癌筛查计划中估算肾癌筛查的效果:在英国生物银行中的验证。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Jun;6(3):351-353. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
4
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models Incorporating Common Genetic Variants for Incident Colorectal Cancer Using UK Biobank.利用英国生物库对纳入常见遗传变异的结直肠癌发病风险预测模型进行外部验证。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Jun;13(6):509-520. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0521. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
5
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Multi-cancer risk stratification based on national health data: a retrospective modelling and validation study.基于国家健康数据的多癌种风险分层:一项回顾性建模和验证研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Jun;6(6):e396-e406. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00062-1.
7
Integrating genome-wide polygenic risk scores and non-genetic risk to predict colorectal cancer diagnosis using UK Biobank data: population based cohort study.利用英国生物库数据整合全基因组多基因风险评分和非遗传风险来预测结直肠癌诊断:基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Nov 9;379:e071707. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071707.
8
OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.OWL:一种基于英国生物银行、PLCO 和 NLST 人群的肺癌筛查的优化和独立验证的机器学习预测模型。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Feb;88:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104443. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
9
Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review.肾癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1380-1390. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
Comparison of prognostic models to predict the occurrence of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic individuals: a systematic literature review and external validation in the EPIC and UK Biobank prospective cohort studies.比较预测无症状个体结直肠癌发生的预后模型:一项系统文献回顾和 EPIC 及 UK Biobank 前瞻性队列研究的外部验证。
Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):672-683. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315730. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Cancer incidence inconsistency between UK Biobank participants and the population: a prospective cohort study.英国生物银行参与者与总体人群之间癌症发病率的不一致性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Mar 26;23(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03998-z.
2
Effect of smoking, hypertension and lifestyle factors on kidney cancer - perspectives for prevention and screening programmes.吸烟、高血压和生活方式因素对肾癌的影响——预防和筛查计划的观点。
Nat Rev Urol. 2023 Nov;20(11):669-681. doi: 10.1038/s41585-023-00781-8. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
The current state of genetic risk models for the development of kidney cancer: a review and validation.
当前用于肾癌发生的遗传风险模型的研究现状:综述与验证。
BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130(5):550-561. doi: 10.1111/bju.15752. Epub 2022 May 7.