Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil.
Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, Adams School of Dentistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Dent Mater. 2021 Nov;37(11):1724-1733. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.09.003. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
This study tested the effects of small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) proteins on phosphoric acid (PA)-treated dentin bonding overtime and the role of such SLRPs in the remineralization potential of demineralized dentin collagen.
Coronal dentin sections of human molars were used. SLRPs were either decorin (DCN) or biglycan (BGN) in core or proteoglycan form (with glycosaminoglycans, GAGs). Groups were: No treatment (control), DCN core, DCN + GAGs, BGN core, BGN + GAGs. Samples were etched with PA for 15 s and prior to application of Adper Single Bond Plus and composite buildup an aliquot of the specific SLRPs was applied over dentin. Twenty-four hours or 6 months after the bonding procedure, samples were tested for microtensile bond strength (MTBS). Debonded beams were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For remineralization studies, dentin blocks were fully demineralized, infused with the SLRPs, placed in artificial saliva for 2 weeks, and evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
MTBS test presented a mean of 51.4 ± 9.1 MPa in control with no statistically significant difference to DCN core (47.6 ± 8.3) and BGN core (48.3 ± 6.5). The full proteoglycan groups DCN + GAGs (27.4 ± 4.5) and BGN + GAGs (36.4 ± 13.6) showed decreased MTBS compared to control (p < 0.001). At 6 months, control or core-treated samples did not have a statistically significant difference in MTBS. However, SLRPs with GAGs showed statistically significant improvement of bonding (62.5 ± 6.0 for DCN and 52.8 ± 8.1 for BGN, p < 0.001) compared to their baseline values. SEM showed that GAGs seem to favor water retention but overtime help remineralization. TEM of demineralized dentin indicated a larger collagen fibril diameter pattern of samples treated with core proteins compared to control and a smaller diameter with DCN + GAGs in water with evidence of mineralization with DCN + GAGS, BGN core and BGN + GAGs.
In conclusion, core proteins seem not to affect dentin adhesion significantly but the presence of GAGs can be detrimental to immediate bonding. However, after ageing of samples, full proteoglycans, particularly DCN, can significantly improve bonding overtime while promoting remineralization which can prove to be clinically beneficial.
本研究旨在测试小富含亮氨酸的蛋白聚糖(SLRP)蛋白对磷酸(PA)处理牙本质粘结随时间的影响,以及此类 SLRPs 在脱矿牙本质胶原再矿化潜力中的作用。
使用人磨牙的冠状牙本质切片。SLRPs 为核心或蛋白聚糖形式的核心聚糖(DCN)或 biglycan(BGN)(具有糖胺聚糖,GAGs)。组为:无处理(对照)、DCN 核心、DCN+GAGs、BGN 核心、BGN+GAGs。用 PA 蚀刻样本 15 秒,然后应用 Adper Single Bond Plus 和复合堆积,在牙本质上施加特定 SLRPs 的一部分。粘结程序 24 小时或 6 个月后,测试样本的微拉伸粘结强度(MTBS)。通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分析离解梁。对于再矿化研究,将牙本质块完全脱矿,注入 SLRPs,在人工唾液中放置 2 周,并用透射电子显微镜(TEM)进行评估。
MTBS 测试在对照组中的平均值为 51.4±9.1MPa,与 DCN 核心(47.6±8.3)和 BGN 核心(48.3±6.5)无统计学差异。完整蛋白聚糖组 DCN+GAGs(27.4±4.5)和 BGN+GAGs(36.4±13.6)与对照组相比,MTBS 明显降低(p<0.001)。6 个月时,对照组或核心处理组的 MTBS 无统计学差异。然而,具有 GAGs 的 SLRPs 与基线值相比,粘结得到了统计学上的显著改善(DCN 为 62.5±6.0,BGN 为 52.8±8.1,p<0.001)。SEM 显示 GAGs 似乎有利于保持水分,但随着时间的推移有助于再矿化。脱矿牙本质的 TEM 显示,与对照组和 DCN+GAGs 在水中相比,用核心蛋白处理的样本的胶原原纤维直径模式更大,用 DCN+GAGS、BGN 核心和 BGN+GAGs 处理的样本直径更小,并有矿化证据。
总之,核心蛋白似乎不会显著影响牙本质粘结,但 GAGs 的存在可能会对即时粘结产生不利影响。然而,在样本老化后,完整蛋白聚糖,特别是 DCN,可随时间显著改善粘结,同时促进再矿化,这可能具有临床益处。