Poraj-Weder Magdalena, Pasternak Aneta, Szulawski Michał
Institute of Psychology, The Maria Grzegorzewska University, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology, Warsaw Management University, Warsaw, Poland.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 3;12:706495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706495. eCollection 2021.
The article presents the construction and validation process of the (HBMS), which measures the motivation toward pro-health behaviors in population of healthy adults. The tool is conceptually based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and more precisely on one of its subtheories-Organismic Integration Theory (OIT). In the first stage of the construction, the linguistic validation with competent judges procedure allowed to eliminate the items which were not correctly formulated. Next, the psychometric properties of the HBMS were assessed in three studies. In Study 1 ( = 323, = 31), the factorial structure of the HBMS was assessed with CFA. Since the preliminary structure was rejected, in order to identify the dimensionality of the items, EFA and Horn's Parallel Analysis were performed. The results showed that the HBMS scale has 5-dimensional structure (intrinsic regulation, integrated and identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation and amotivation). In Study 2 ( = 342, = 33), the structure of the HBMS has been confirmed by conducting CFA analysis. Analyses preformed in this study provided good evidence for convergent and discriminant validity as well as the internal reliability of the HBMS subscales. Finally, in the LPA analysis two classes with distinct regulatory profiles have been extracted, which showed differences in the extend of health-related behaviors. In Study 3 ( = 60, = 30) the test-retest reliability of the HBMS was confirmed. The scale can be therefore successfully used in future basic and applied studies as it possesses robust psychometric properties.
本文介绍了健康行为动机量表(HBMS)的构建与验证过程,该量表用于测量健康成年人群体中促进健康行为的动机。该工具在概念上基于自我决定理论(SDT),更确切地说是基于其一个子理论——机体整合理论(OIT)。在构建的第一阶段,通过与专业评判员进行语言验证程序,剔除了表述不正确的项目。接下来,在三项研究中评估了HBMS的心理测量特性。在研究1(n = 323,M = 31)中,用验证性因素分析(CFA)评估了HBMS的因子结构。由于初步结构被否决,为了确定项目的维度,进行了探索性因素分析(EFA)和霍恩平行分析。结果表明,HBMS量表具有五维结构(内在调节、整合与认同调节、内摄调节、外部调节和无动机)。在研究2(n = 342,M = 33)中,通过进行CFA分析证实了HBMS的结构。本研究中进行的分析为HBMS分量表的收敛效度、区分效度以及内部信度提供了充分的证据。最后,在潜在剖面分析(LPA)中提取了两个具有不同调节特征的类别,这表明在与健康相关行为的程度上存在差异。在研究3(n = 60,M = 30)中,证实了HBMS的重测信度。因此,该量表因其具有稳健的心理测量特性,可成功用于未来的基础研究和应用研究。