• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康行为动机量表中文版的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study.

作者信息

Ge Yuanhui, Zheng Chen, Wang Xin, Liu Tao

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.

Nursing Department of Huaian Hospital of Huaian City, Huaian, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;15:1279816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279816. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279816
PMID:38298519
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10827909/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study's objectives were to translate the Health Behavior Motivation Scale (HBMS) into Chinese and verify the scale's validity and reliability among Chinese healthy adults.

METHOD

The HBMS scales were translated into Chinese based on Brislin's principles. The Chinese version of HBMS is created through translation, back translation, and cross-cultural adaptation. This investigation implemented the convenience sampling method to conduct a survey on 781 healthy respondents, utilizing the Chinese version of the HBMS and a general demographic questionnaire. We used AMOS (v28.0) and SPSS (v26.0) for statistical analysis. We employed test-retest reliability, split-half reliability, and internal consistency to assess the reliability of the translation questionnaire. Structure validity and content validity were used to assess validity.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the Health Behavior Motivation Scale (HBMS) had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.885, and the range of Cronbach's alpha values for each dimension was 0.820-0.885. The scale's test-retest reliability was 0.824, and its split-half reliability was 0.906. Five public factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 56.527% were retrieved from the exploratory factor analysis. Moreover, the factor loading value for each item exceeded 0.4.In confirmatory factor analysis, the indicators were reported as follows: χ/df = 1.567, GFI = 0.900, CFI = 0.952, IFI = 0.952, TLI = 0.946, AGFI = 0.881, PGFI = 0.757, PNFI = 0.789, RMSEA = 0.039, and the results of the model fit metrics were within the reference range.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the HBMS exhibits strong discrimination, validity, and reliability. The tool effectively identifies the motivation of healthy people to engage in healthy behaviors. It can be used by healthcare practitioners to assist in the development of follow-up interventions to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease in older people and the incidence of chronic disease in populations of young and middle-aged people.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在将健康行为动机量表(HBMS)翻译成中文,并验证该量表在中国健康成年人中的有效性和可靠性。

方法

根据 Brislin 原则将 HBMS 量表翻译成中文。通过翻译、回译和跨文化适应创建 HBMS 的中文版。本调查采用便利抽样方法,对 781 名健康受访者进行调查,使用 HBMS 中文版和一份一般人口统计学问卷。我们使用 AMOS(v28.0)和 SPSS(v26.0)进行统计分析。我们采用重测信度、分半信度和内部一致性来评估翻译问卷的信度。采用结构效度和内容效度来评估效度。

结果

健康行为动机量表(HBMS)中文版的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.885,各维度的 Cronbach's alpha 值范围为 0.820 - 0.885。该量表的重测信度为 0.824,分半信度为 0.906。从探索性因素分析中提取了五个公共因素,累积方差贡献率为 56.527%。此外,每个项目的因素负荷值均超过 0.4。在验证性因素分析中,指标报告如下:χ/df = 1.567,GFI = 0.900,CFI = 0.952,IFI = 0.952,TLI = 0.946,AGFI = 0.881,PGFI = 0.757,PNFI = 0.789,RMSEA = 0.039,模型拟合指标结果在参考范围内。

结论

HBMS 中文版具有较强的区分度、效度和信度。该工具能有效识别健康人群参与健康行为的动机。医护人员可使用它来协助制定后续干预措施,以降低老年人慢性病的患病率以及中青年人群慢性病的发病率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ee/10827909/1892016ba0c6/fpsyg-15-1279816-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ee/10827909/f94421fd0253/fpsyg-15-1279816-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ee/10827909/1892016ba0c6/fpsyg-15-1279816-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ee/10827909/f94421fd0253/fpsyg-15-1279816-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ee/10827909/1892016ba0c6/fpsyg-15-1279816-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the health behavior motivation scale: a translation and validation study.健康行为动机量表中文版的心理测量学特性:一项翻译与验证研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 17;15:1279816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279816. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychometric properties of the chinese version of the value-based stigma inventory (VASI): a translation and validation study.基于价值的污名量表(VASI)中文版的心理计量学特性:翻译和验证研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05998-4.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Elderly-Constipation Impact Scale: a translation and validation study.《中文版老年人便秘影响量表的心理测量学评估:翻译与验证研究》
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 13;23(1):1345. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16231-4.
4
Evaluation of reliability and validity regarding the Chinese version of Critical Cultural Competence Scale for clinical nurses.临床护士关键文化能力量表中文版的信度和效度评价。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Oct 28;47(10):1425-1434. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2022.210695.
5
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the self-care scale for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: A translation and validation study.中文版老年人髋关节骨折术后自我护理量表的心理测量特性:翻译和验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;11:1119630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1119630. eCollection 2023.
6
Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the Pregnancy Exercise Attitudes Scale (C-PEAS).中文版孕期运动态度量表(C-PEAS)的心理测量学特征。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06817-0.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the stressors in breast cancer scale: a translation and validation study.中文版乳腺癌应激源量表的心理计量学评估:翻译与验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18000-3.
8
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of Occupational LowBack Pain Prevention Behaviors Questionnaire Among Clinical Nurses: A Validation Study.临床护士中文版职业性下背痛预防行为问卷的心理计量学评价:一项验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;10:827604. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.827604. eCollection 2022.
9
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the coronary artery disease empowerment scale (CADES) in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention.中文版冠心病患者授权量表(CADES)在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的冠心病患者中的信度和效度。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Aug 23;24(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04114-4.
10
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Positive Health Behaviours Scale for clinical nurses: a cross-sectional translation.临床护士积极健康行为量表中文版的心理测量学评价:横断面翻译
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 31;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01453-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the BENEFITS-CCCSAT based on CTT and IRT: a cross-sectional design translation and validation study.基于经典测验理论和项目反应理论对中文版BENEFITS-CCCSAT进行心理测量学评估:一项横断面设计的翻译与验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 18;13:1532709. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532709. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding health behavior change by motivation and reward mechanisms: a review of the literature.通过动机和奖励机制理解健康行为改变:文献综述
Front Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun 19;17:1151918. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2023.1151918. eCollection 2023.
2
Enduring Relevance of the Stages of Change Model for Transforming Lifestyle Behaviors.改变生活方式行为的阶段变化模型的持久相关性。
Circ J. 2023 Jul 25;87(8):1138-1142. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-23-0292. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
3
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the self-care scale for older adults undergoing hip fracture surgery: A translation and validation study.
中文版老年人髋关节骨折术后自我护理量表的心理测量特性:翻译和验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;11:1119630. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1119630. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and validation of the advance care planning practice preference scale for clinical nurses.临床护士预先医疗照护计划实践偏好量表的编制与验证。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jul;79(7):2695-2708. doi: 10.1111/jan.15641. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
5
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the self-directed learning instrument in Chinese nursing students.中文版自我导向学习工具在中国护理专业学生中的信效度研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Feb 24;22(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01201-3.
6
Development and validation of a comprehensive health literacy tool for adults in Hong Kong.开发和验证香港成年人综合健康素养工具。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 10;10:1043197. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1043197. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale in Medical Staff: Cross-sectional Study.医务人员中文版华威-爱丁堡心理健康量表的心理测量特性:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 30;24(11):e38108. doi: 10.2196/38108.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the healthy aging activity engagement scale.健康老龄化活动参与量表的心理测量学评估。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:986666. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.986666. eCollection 2022.
9
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of advance care planning self-efficacy scale among clinical nurses.临床护士中文版预先医疗照护计划自我效能感量表的心理测量学评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 7;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01064-6.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the instrument of health literacy competencies for health professionals.健康专业人员健康素养能力测评工具中文版的信度和效度。
Nurs Open. 2023 Feb;10(2):926-938. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1360. Epub 2022 Sep 15.