Department of Cancer Immunology, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
KG Jebsen Centre for B Cell Malignancies, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Blood Adv. 2021 Nov 23;5(22):4771-4782. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004777.
Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have a median age of 70 years. Yet, empirical knowledge about the treatment of older patients is limited because they are frequently excluded from clinical trials. We aimed to construct a simplified frailty score and examine survival and treatment-related mortality (TRM) according to frailty status and treatment intensity in an older real-world population with DLBCL. All patients aged ≥70 years diagnosed with DLBCL between 2006 and 2016 in southeastern Norway (N = 784) were included retrospectively and divided into training (n = 522) and validation (n = 262) cohorts. We constructed and validated a frailty score based on geriatric assessment variables and examined survival and TRM according to frailty status and treatment. The frailty score identified 3 frailty groups with distinct survival and TRM, independent of established prognostic factors (2-year overall survival [OS]: fit, 82%; unfit, 47%; frail, 14%; P < .001). For fit patients, full-dose R-CHOP (initial dosage >80%) was associated with better survival than attenuated R-CHOP ([R-miniCHOP]; 2-year OS: 86% vs 70%; P = .012), also in adjusted analyses. For unfit and frail patients, full-dose R-CHOP was not superior to R-miniCHOP, whereas an anthracycline-free regimen was associated with poorer survival in adjusted analyses. A simplified frailty score identified unfit and frail patients with a higher risk for death and TRM, which can aid treatment-intensity decisions in older patients with DLBCL. In this study, fit patients benefited from full-dose R-CHOP, whereas unfit and frail patients had no benefit from full-dose R-CHOP over R-miniCHOP. An online calculator for assessment of the frailty score is available at https://wide.shinyapps.io/app-frailty/.
患者弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (DLBCL) 的中位年龄为 70 岁。然而,由于他们经常被排除在临床试验之外,因此对于老年患者的治疗经验知识有限。我们旨在构建一个简化的脆弱性评分,并根据脆弱性状态和治疗强度,检查年龄较大的真实世界人群中 DLBCL 患者的生存和治疗相关死亡率 (TRM)。2006 年至 2016 年间,挪威东南部所有年龄≥70 岁被诊断为 DLBCL 的患者(N = 784)均被回顾性纳入,并分为训练队列(n = 522)和验证队列(n = 262)。我们构建并验证了一个基于老年评估变量的脆弱性评分,并根据脆弱性状态和治疗检查了生存和 TRM。脆弱性评分确定了 3 个具有不同生存和 TRM 的脆弱性组,独立于既定的预后因素(2 年总生存率 [OS]:健康,82%;不健康,47%;脆弱,14%;P<0.001)。对于健康患者,全剂量 R-CHOP(初始剂量>80%)与衰减的 R-CHOP([R-miniCHOP];2 年 OS:86%比 70%;P =.012)相比,生存获益更好,在调整后的分析中也是如此。对于不健康和脆弱的患者,全剂量 R-CHOP 并不优于 R-miniCHOP,而在调整后的分析中,无蒽环类药物的方案与较差的生存相关。一个简化的脆弱性评分确定了死亡和 TRM 风险较高的不健康和脆弱患者,这有助于为 DLBCL 老年患者做出治疗强度决策。在这项研究中,健康患者从全剂量 R-CHOP 中获益,而不健康和脆弱的患者从全剂量 R-CHOP 中获益并不优于 R-miniCHOP。一个用于评估脆弱性评分的在线计算器可在 https://wide.shinyapps.io/app-frailty/ 上获得。