Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 May;39(3):501-512. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.265. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Optimal risk stratification based on simplified geriatric assessment to predict treatment-related toxicity and survival needs to be clarified in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL (≥ 65 yr) between September 2015 and April 2018. A simplified geriatric assessment was performed at baseline using Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).
The study included 249 patients, the median age was 74 years (range, 65-88), and 125 (50.2%) were female. In multivariable Cox analysis, ADL, IADL, CCI, and age were independent factors for EFS; an integrated geriatric score was derived and the patients stratified into three geriatric categories: fit (n = 162, 65.1%), intermediate-fit (n = 25, 10.0%), and frail (n = 62, 24.9%). The established geriatric model was significantly associated with EFS (fit vs. intermediate-fit, HR 2.61, p < 0.001; fit vs. frail, HR 4.61, p < 0.001) and outperformed each covariate alone or in combination. In 87 intermediate-fit or frail patients, the relative doxorubicin dose intensity (RDDI) ≥ 62.4% was significantly associated with worse EFS (HR, 2.15, 95% CI 1.30-3.53, p = 0.002). It was related with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 symptomatic non-hematologic toxicities (63.2% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001) and earlier treatment discontinuation (34.5% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) in patients with RDDI ≥ 62.4% than in those with RDDI < 62.4%.
This model integrating simplified geriatric assessment can risk-stratify older patients with DLBCL and identify those who are highly vulnerable to standard dose-intensity chemoimmunotherapy.
背景/目的:在老年弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中,需要基于简化的老年综合评估进行最佳风险分层,以预测与治疗相关的毒性和生存情况。
本多中心前瞻性队列研究纳入了 2015 年 9 月至 2018 年 4 月期间新诊断为 DLBCL(≥65 岁)的患者。基线时使用日常生活活动(ADL)、工具性日常生活活动(IADL)和 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)进行简化的老年综合评估。主要终点是无事件生存(EFS)。
该研究纳入了 249 名患者,中位年龄为 74 岁(范围,65-88 岁),125 名(50.2%)为女性。多变量 Cox 分析显示,ADL、IADL、CCI 和年龄是 EFS 的独立因素;得出了一个综合老年评分,并将患者分为三个老年类别:健康(n=162,65.1%)、中等健康(n=25,10.0%)和虚弱(n=62,24.9%)。建立的老年模型与 EFS 显著相关(健康与中等健康相比,HR 2.61,p<0.001;健康与虚弱相比,HR 4.61,p<0.001),且优于单独或组合的每个协变量。在 87 名中等健康或虚弱的患者中,阿霉素剂量强度(RDDI)≥62.4%与较差的 EFS 显著相关(HR,2.15;95%CI,1.30-3.53;p=0.002)。与 RDDI<62.4%的患者相比,RDDI≥62.4%的患者 EFS 更差(HR,2.15;95%CI,1.30-3.53;p=0.002),且更易发生≥3 级有症状的非血液学毒性(63.2% vs. 27.8%,p<0.001)和更早的治疗中断(34.5% vs. 8.0%,p<0.001)。
该模型整合了简化的老年综合评估,可以对 DLBCL 老年患者进行风险分层,并识别出对标准剂量强度化疗免疫治疗高度敏感的患者。