• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用基于合理性的情景规划提高对极端事件的应对能力:来自新冠疫情的经验教训

Increasing Preparedness for Extreme Events using Plausibility-Based Scenario Planning: Lessons from COVID-19.

作者信息

Derbyshire James

机构信息

Middlesex University Business School, London, UK.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):97-104. doi: 10.1111/risa.13827. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13827
PMID:34545604
Abstract

A striking feature of COVID-19 is many countries' low level of preparedness for it, despite pandemics being a known threat. This raises a question as to the reasons for this underpreparedness. While preparedness should have better reflected pandemics' long-run inevitability and potentially catastrophic impact, government-planning horizons are short term, and the attentiveness of policymakers is bounded and subject to multiple demands. Preparedness is therefore affected by the fundamental uncertainty surrounding the exact nature, timing, and impact of a pandemic. While a subjective probability is attributable to such an event's occurrence, just like it is any other, if founded on scant knowledge and perceived as being low it may inhibit preparedness. Under such circumstances, preparedness may be better served by a focus on plausibility. Moreover, any tendency for policymakers to disregard highly uncertain, low-probability, yet highly impactful events of this type is exacerbated by their "fat-tailed" distribution, which obscures their potential extremity. This article considers how plausibility-based scenario planning can increase preparedness for extreme events like a global pandemic, thereby reducing overconfidence in continued business-as-usual in their face, and emphasizing precaution in their wake. In so doing, the article contributes to what in this journal has recently been called "type B," "generic and fundamental" risk science, which is concerned with identifying better ways to present and communicate uncertainties. In focusing on plausibility-based scenario planning, the article highlights a method seldom previously discussed in relation to risk science, yet one that can contribute much to this type B component of it.

摘要

新冠疫情的一个显著特征是,尽管大流行是已知的威胁,但许多国家对其防范水平较低。这就引发了一个问题,即造成这种防范不足的原因是什么。虽然防范措施本应更好地反映大流行的长期必然性及其潜在的灾难性影响,但政府的规划视野是短期的,政策制定者的注意力有限且受到多种需求的制约。因此,防范措施受到围绕大流行的确切性质、时间和影响的基本不确定性的影响。虽然可以像对待其他任何事件一样,为这样一个事件的发生归因一个主观概率,但如果基于匮乏的知识且被认为概率较低,它可能会抑制防范措施。在这种情况下,关注似真性可能更有助于做好防范。此外,政策制定者忽视此类高度不确定、低概率但影响重大的事件的任何倾向,会因其“厚尾”分布而加剧,这种分布掩盖了它们潜在的极端性。本文探讨了基于似真性的情景规划如何能够增强对全球大流行等极端事件的防范能力,从而减少面对此类事件时对照常行事的过度自信,并在事件发生后强调预防措施。通过这样做,本文为该期刊最近所称的“B类”“通用和基础”风险科学做出了贡献,这类风险科学关注的是找出更好地呈现和传达不确定性的方法。在聚焦基于似真性的情景规划时,本文突出了一种此前很少在风险科学中讨论的方法,但这种方法能够对其B类组成部分做出很大贡献。

相似文献

1
Increasing Preparedness for Extreme Events using Plausibility-Based Scenario Planning: Lessons from COVID-19.运用基于合理性的情景规划提高对极端事件的应对能力:来自新冠疫情的经验教训
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):97-104. doi: 10.1111/risa.13827. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
Should policy makers trust composite indices? A commentary on the pitfalls of inappropriate indices for policy formation.政策制定者是否应该信任综合指数?对不适当的政策制定指数的陷阱的评论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00702-4.
3
Pandemic influenza preparedness in the WHO South-East Asia Region: a model for planning regional preparedness for other priority high-threat pathogens.世界卫生组织东南亚区域的大流行性流感防范:为其他重点高威胁病原体规划区域防范工作的一个模式
WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2020 Apr;9(1):43-49. doi: 10.4103/2224-3151.282995.
4
Organising knowledge to prevent global health crises: a comparative analysis of pandemic preparedness indicators.组织知识以预防全球卫生危机:大流行防范指标的比较分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006864.
5
Countries with delayed COVID-19 introduction - characteristics, drivers, gaps, and opportunities.延迟引入 COVID-19 的国家——特征、驱动因素、差距和机遇。
Global Health. 2021 Mar 17;17(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00678-4.
6
Lessons From Influenza Pandemics of the Last 100 Years.百年流感大流行的教训。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 14;70(5):951-957. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz803.
7
US Hospital Capacity Managers' Experiences and Concerns Regarding Preparedness for Seasonal Influenza and Influenza-like Illness.美国医院容量管理者对季节性流感和流感样疾病准备情况的经验和关注。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e212382. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2382.
8
Framing post-pandemic preparedness: Comparing eight European plans.后疫情时代准备工作的构建:比较八个欧洲计划。
Glob Public Health. 2018 Jan;13(1):99-114. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1149202. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
9
Pandemic planning and response in academic pediatric emergency departments during the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.2009 年 H1N1 流感大流行期间,学术型儿科急诊部门的大流行规划和应对。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/acem.12061.
10
[Preparedness planning for an influenza pandemic: regional efforts].[流感大流行的防范规划:区域努力]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2008 Jun;23(6):428-34. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892008000600012.

引用本文的文献

1
Out of sight but still in mind: Developing an expectation for surprises by formalizing unknowledge in a contemporary risk-assessment framework.视而不见却仍铭记于心:通过在当代风险评估框架中形式化未知来培养对意外的预期。
Risk Anal. 2025 Jun;45(6):1199-1206. doi: 10.1111/risa.17661. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
2
Global systemic risk and resilience for novel coronavirus in postpandemic era.后疫情时代新型冠状病毒的全球系统性风险和弹性。
Risk Anal. 2022 Jan;42(1):1-4. doi: 10.1111/risa.13873.