a Department of Medical Sciences , Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
b Department of Culture and Media Studies , Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden.
Glob Public Health. 2018 Jan;13(1):99-114. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1149202. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
Framing has previously been studied in the field of pandemic preparedness and global health governance and influenza pandemics have usually been framed in terms of security and evidence-based medicine on a global scale. This paper is based on the pandemic preparedness plans, published after 2009, from eight European countries. We study how pandemic preparedness is framed and how pandemic influenza in general is narrated in the plans. All plans contain references to 'uncertainty', 'pandemic phases', 'risk management', 'vulnerability' and 'surveillance'. These themes were all framed differently in the studied plans. The preparedness plans in the member states diverge in ways that will challenge the ambition of the European Union to make the pandemic preparedness plans interoperable and to co-ordinate the member states during future pandemics.
框架先前在大流行防范和全球卫生治理领域进行了研究，在全球范围内，流感大流行通常被框定为安全和循证医学的问题。本文基于 2009 年后发布的 8 个欧洲国家的大流行防范计划。我们研究了大流行防范是如何被构建框架的，以及大流行流感在这些计划中是如何被叙述的。所有计划都提到了“不确定性”、“大流行阶段”、“风险管理”、“脆弱性”和“监测”。这些主题在研究计划中的构建方式都有所不同。成员国的防范计划存在差异，这将挑战欧盟使大流行防范计划具有互操作性并在未来大流行期间协调成员国的目标。
