• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球卫生安全指数不能预测经合组织国家的疫苗推广应对措施。

The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of vaccine rollout responses among OECD countries.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore MD, USA.

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.034
PMID:34547494
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8450232/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate the utility of the Global Health Security (GHS) index in predicting the launch of COVID-19 vaccine rollout by Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member countries.

METHODS

Country-level data on the preparedness to respond to infectious disease threats through vaccination rollout were collected using the GHS index. OECD member countries were rank-ordered based on the percentage of their populations fully vaccinated against COVID-19. Rank-ordering was conducted from the lowest to the highest, with each country assigned a score ranging from 1 to 33. Spearman's rank correlation between the GHS index and the percentage of the population that is fully vaccinated was also performed.

RESULTS

Israel, ranked 34 in the world on the GHS index for pandemic preparedness, had the highest percentage of the population that was fully vaccinated against COVID-19 within 2 months of the global vaccine rollout. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between GHS index and the percentage of population fully vaccinated was -0.1378, with a p-value of 0.43.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest an absence of correlation between the GHS index rating and the COVID-19 vaccine rollout of OECD countries, indicating that the preparedness of OECD countries for infectious disease threats may not be accurately reflected by the GHS index.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全球卫生安全(GHS)指数在预测经合组织(OECD)成员国推出 COVID-19 疫苗方面的效用。

方法

使用 GHS 指数收集了通过疫苗接种推出来应对传染病威胁的国家准备情况的国家层面数据。根据 COVID-19 完全接种疫苗的人口比例,对 OECD 成员国进行了排名。排名从最低到最高进行,每个国家的得分为 1 到 33 之间的一个分数。还对 GHS 指数和完全接种疫苗的人口百分比之间进行了 Spearman 等级相关分析。

结果

在全球疫苗推出后 2 个月内,在大流行准备方面在 GHS 指数中全球排名第 34 位的以色列,其 COVID-19 完全接种疫苗的人口比例最高。GHS 指数和完全接种疫苗人口百分比之间的 Spearman 等级相关系数为-0.1378,p 值为 0.43。

结论

这些发现表明 GHS 指数评分与 OECD 国家 COVID-19 疫苗接种之间没有相关性,这表明 OECD 国家对传染病威胁的准备情况可能无法被 GHS 指数准确反映。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f44/8450232/a998790f3b34/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f44/8450232/a998790f3b34/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f44/8450232/a998790f3b34/gr1_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of vaccine rollout responses among OECD countries.全球卫生安全指数不能预测经合组织国家的疫苗推广应对措施。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
2
The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.全球卫生安全指数不能预测经济合作与发展组织国家应对冠状病毒大流行的情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239398. eCollection 2020.
3
Are we ready to deal with a global COVID-19 pandemic? Rethinking countries' capacity based on the Global Health Security Index.我们是否已准备好应对全球 COVID-19 大流行?基于《全球卫生安全指数》重新思考各国的应对能力。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 May;106:289-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.089. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Pandemic preparedness improves national-level SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality data completeness: a cross-country ecologic analysis.大流行准备工作提高了国家级 SARS-CoV-2 感染和死亡率数据的完整性:一项跨国生态分析。
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Jun 15;22(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00333-1.
5
Early Covid-19 vaccination rollout: a commentary from England.早期新冠肺炎疫苗接种推广:来自英格兰的评论。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Feb 26;10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00451-3.
6
Alternative Global Health Security Indexes for Risk Analysis of COVID-19.替代全球卫生安全指数用于 COVID-19 风险分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 1;17(9):3161. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093161.
7
COVID-19 in conflict region: the arab levant response.新冠疫情在冲突地区:阿拉伯黎凡特的应对。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Aug 26;21(1):1590. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11580-4.
8
Analysing COVID-19 outcomes in the context of the 2019 Global Health Security (GHS) Index.分析 2019 年全球卫生安全(GHS)指数背景下的 COVID-19 结局。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007581.
9
Cross-country evidence on the role of national governance in boosting COVID-19 vaccination.跨国证据表明,国家治理在推动 COVID-19 疫苗接种方面发挥了作用。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;22(1):576. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12985-5.
10
Testing the Club Convergence Dynamics of the COVID-19 Vaccination Rates Across the OECD Countries.检测经合组织国家 COVID-19 疫苗接种率的俱乐部趋同动态。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 6;10:872561. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.872561. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency preparedness and health system resilience assessment tool: development and initial validation.应急准备与卫生系统恢复力评估工具:开发与初步验证
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Aug 11;10(8):e016459. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016459.
2
The Global Health Security Index and Its Role in Shaping National COVID‑19 Response Capacities: A Scoping Review.《全球卫生安全指数及其在塑造国家新冠疫情应对能力方面的作用:一项范围综述》
Ann Glob Health. 2025 Mar 14;91(1):15. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4625. eCollection 2025.
3
Scoping review of countries' practices missed by health emergency preparedness and response quantitative tools: COVID-19 and Ebola response experiences.
卫生应急准备与响应定量工具遗漏的各国实践的范围审查:COVID-19和埃博拉应对经验
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 7;2(2):e001022. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001022. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Comparison of the Bulut Index-Beta method and Global Health Security Index: results from the world's countries.布卢特指数-β法与全球卫生安全指数比较:来自世界各国的结果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1;54(4):822-837. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5854. eCollection 2024.
5
The biosafety incident response competence scale for clinical nursing staff: a development and validation study.临床护理人员生物安全事件应对能力量表的编制与验证研究
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 14;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01848-6.
6
The level of countries' preparedness to health risks during Covid-19 and pre-pandemic: the differential response to health systems building blocks and socioeconomic indicators.新冠疫情期间及大流行之前各国对健康风险的防范水平:对卫生系统组成要素和社会经济指标的差异化应对。
Health Econ Rev. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13561-023-00428-9.
7
Does the Public Health Security Capacity Provide Better Preparedness for Health Emergencies? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of 180 Countries During the COVID-19 Outbreak.公共卫生安全能力是否为应对突发卫生事件提供了更好的准备?COVID-19 疫情期间 180 个国家的横断面分析。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Dec 12;17:e322. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.292.
8
Reconceptualizing successful pandemic preparedness and response: A feminist perspective.重新构想成功的大流行病防范和应对:女性主义视角。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115511. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115511. Epub 2022 Nov 7.