• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

布卢特指数-β法与全球卫生安全指数比较:来自世界各国的结果。

Comparison of the Bulut Index-Beta method and Global Health Security Index: results from the world's countries.

机构信息

Department of Health Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkiye.

Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Ankara, Turkiye.

出版信息

Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1;54(4):822-837. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5854. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.55730/1300-0144.5854
PMID:39295625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11407367/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The Global Health Security Index (GHSI), which is used to assess the global health security preparedness levels of countries, and the Bulut Index-Beta (BI-β) method, developed as a multicriteria decision-making method, were compared in terms of global health security in the context of the world's countries. It was aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of the BI-β method by testing it on GHSI datasets and contribute to the methodological development of the GHSI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The datasets used in this study were the publicly available GHSI datasets, which allow for comparative evaluations of countries. The BI-β method and GHSI were used to compare countries in terms of global health security.

RESULTS

In 2021, the top three best-performing countries in terms of global health security were the United States (BI-β = 85.46), Australia (BI-β = 82.53), and the United Kingdom (BI-β = 82.29). For 2019, the United States (BI-β = 85.44) and Australia (BI-β = 81.69) had the same ranks as in 2021, but the United Kingdom (BI-β = 76.63) dropped to 9th place. There was a statistically significant positive weak monotonic relationship between BI-β and GHSI rankings.

CONCLUSION

Since the GHSI scoring system is not consistent or questionable, the weighting process needs to be objectively reconsidered and the reasons for the weighting process need to be explained. The GHSI was conceptualized based on a narrow and technical framework. Therefore, it is recommended that the social and political determinants of public health be taken into account in the GHSI. On the other hand, the BI-β method can be easily used in solving other multicriteria decision-making problems, especially in public health areas such as global health security.

摘要

背景/目的:全球卫生安全指数(GHSI)用于评估各国的全球卫生安全准备水平,而 Bulut 指数-Beta(BI-β)方法作为一种多准则决策方法,在评估各国的全球卫生安全方面进行了比较。目的是通过对 GHSI 数据集进行测试来验证 BI-β 方法的可行性,并为 GHSI 的方法学发展做出贡献。

材料和方法

本研究使用的数据集是公开的 GHSI 数据集,允许对各国进行比较评估。BI-β 方法和 GHSI 用于比较各国的全球卫生安全状况。

结果

2021 年,全球卫生安全表现最好的三个国家是美国(BI-β=85.46)、澳大利亚(BI-β=82.53)和英国(BI-β=82.29)。2019 年,美国(BI-β=85.44)和澳大利亚(BI-β=81.69)与 2021 年的排名相同,但英国(BI-β=76.63)降至第 9 位。BI-β 和 GHSI 排名之间存在统计学上显著的正弱单调关系。

结论

由于 GHSI 评分系统不一致或存在疑问,需要客观地重新考虑加权过程,并解释加权过程的原因。GHSI 的概念是基于一个狭隘和技术性的框架。因此,建议在 GHSI 中考虑公共卫生的社会和政治决定因素。另一方面,BI-β 方法可以很容易地用于解决其他多准则决策问题,特别是在全球卫生安全等公共卫生领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695c/11407367/aa2c75087ef8/tjmed-54-04-822f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695c/11407367/aa2c75087ef8/tjmed-54-04-822f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/695c/11407367/aa2c75087ef8/tjmed-54-04-822f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Bulut Index-Beta method and Global Health Security Index: results from the world's countries.布卢特指数-β法与全球卫生安全指数比较:来自世界各国的结果。
Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Jun 1;54(4):822-837. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5854. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation analysis of Global Health Security Index (GHSI) scores 2019.2019 年全球卫生安全指数(GHSI)得分的验证分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003276.
3
Global Health Security Index not a proven surrogate for health systems capacity to respond to pandemics: The case of COVID-19.全球卫生安全指数不能作为应对大流行病的卫生系统能力的可靠替代指标:以 COVID-19 为例。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 Feb;16(2):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
The Global Health Security index and Joint External Evaluation score for health preparedness are not correlated with countries' COVID-19 detection response time and mortality outcome.全球卫生安全指数和卫生准备联合外部评估得分与各国的 COVID-19 检测响应时间和死亡率结果无关。
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Sep 7;148:e210. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820002046.
5
The Global Health Security Index: Another Look.《全球卫生安全指数:再审视》
Front Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 13;2:846260. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2022.846260. eCollection 2022.
6
Strengthening national capacities for pandemic preparedness: a cross-country analysis of COVID-19 cases and deaths.加强国家大流行防范能力:对 COVID-19 病例和死亡的跨国分析。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Jan 13;37(1):55-64. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab122.
7
The 2019 Global Health Security Index (GHSI) and its implications for New Zealand and Pacific regional health security.《2019年全球卫生安全指数》及其对新西兰和太平洋地区卫生安全的影响。
N Z Med J. 2020 Jun 12;133(1516):83-92.
8
The institutional capacity of the Health Sector and the response to COVID-19 in a global perspective.从全球视角看卫生部门的机构能力及对新冠疫情的应对。
Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Oct;26(10):4645-4654. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320212610.11852021. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Should policy makers trust composite indices? A commentary on the pitfalls of inappropriate indices for policy formation.政策制定者是否应该信任综合指数?对不适当的政策制定指数的陷阱的评论。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 22;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00702-4.
10
Does it matter that standard preparedness indices did not predict COVID-19 outcomes?标准准备指数未能预测 COVID-19 结局,这有关系吗?
Global Health. 2023 Sep 23;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00973-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Security inequalities in Non-EU European Countries: A Cross-National Comparative Assessment Using an Integrated MCDM-Machine Learning Approach.非欧盟欧洲国家的卫生安全不平等:使用集成多准则决策-机器学习方法的跨国比较评估
F1000Res. 2025 Aug 19;14:462. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.163662.2. eCollection 2025.
2
Income-Based analysis of health security in Western Asia through an integrated GHSI, MCDM, and Clustering Model.通过综合全球卫生安全指数(GHSI)、多准则决策方法(MCDM)和聚类模型对西亚卫生安全进行基于收入的分析。
F1000Res. 2025 Mar 28;14:43. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.159002.1. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation of the size of the COVID-19 pandemic using the epidemiological wavelength model: results from OECD countries.利用流行病学波长模型估计 COVID-19 大流行的规模:来自经合组织国家的数据。
Public Health. 2023 Jul;220:172-178. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 16.
2
Global Health Security Index not a proven surrogate for health systems capacity to respond to pandemics: The case of COVID-19.全球卫生安全指数不能作为应对大流行病的卫生系统能力的可靠替代指标:以 COVID-19 为例。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 Feb;16(2):196-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
3
The applications of MCDM methods in COVID-19 pandemic: A state of the art review.
多准则决策方法在新冠疫情中的应用:一项最新综述
Appl Soft Comput. 2022 Sep;126:109238. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109238. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
4
Global health and health security - conflicting concepts for achieving stability through health?全球健康与卫生安全——通过健康实现稳定的相互冲突的概念?
Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec;17(12):3972-3980. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2022.2049342. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Analysing COVID-19 outcomes in the context of the 2019 Global Health Security (GHS) Index.分析 2019 年全球卫生安全(GHS)指数背景下的 COVID-19 结局。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007581.
6
Demography, inequalities and Global Health Security Index as correlates of COVID-19 morbidity and mortality.人口统计学、不平等现象与全球卫生安全指数与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的相关性。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Mar;37(2):944-962. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3384. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
7
The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of vaccine rollout responses among OECD countries.全球卫生安全指数不能预测经合组织国家的疫苗推广应对措施。
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
8
Validation analysis of Global Health Security Index (GHSI) scores 2019.2019 年全球卫生安全指数(GHSI)得分的验证分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003276.
9
The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index.全球卫生安全指数的价值主张。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003648.
10
The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.全球卫生安全指数不能预测经济合作与发展组织国家应对冠状病毒大流行的情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 7;15(10):e0239398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239398. eCollection 2020.