Assistant Professor in the Department of Foundational Medical Studies at Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine in Rochester, Michigan USA.
Second-Year Medical Student at the Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine in Rochester, Michigan USA.
J Clin Ethics. 2021 Fall;32(3):265-270.
The legal and ethical asymmetry between honoring positive claims of conscience versus negative claims of conscience was recently analyzed by several articles in this journal. The first author of this article (ALB) identified unique but defeasible reasons against honoring positive claims of conscience, such as the greater threat they post to institutional values and institutional resources than negative claims of conscience. However, ALB wrote, when these reasons can be overcome, positive claims of conscience should enjoy the same ethical and legal respect as negative claims of conscience. This article argues that the prescription of birth control by non-Roman Catholic physicians in Roman Catholic institutions is an example of a positive claim of conscience that can overcome concerns of institutional values and resources, and therefore ought to receive the same ethical respect and legal protection as negative claims of conscience. In making this argument, this article also responds to several of the thoughtful comments raised by Alberto Giubilini and Dominic Wilkinson.
该期刊的几篇文章最近分析了尊重良心的正面主张与良心的负面主张在法律和伦理上的不对称性。本文的第一作者(ALB)确定了反对尊重良心的正面主张的独特但可反驳的理由,例如与良心的负面主张相比,它们对机构价值观和机构资源构成的更大威胁。然而,ALB 写道,当这些理由可以被克服时,良心的正面主张应该享有与良心的负面主张相同的伦理和法律尊重。本文认为,罗马天主教机构中的非罗马天主教医生开出避孕药具的处方就是一个良心的正面主张的例子,它可以克服对机构价值观和资源的担忧,因此应该像良心的负面主张一样受到同样的伦理尊重和法律保护。在提出这一论点时,本文还回应了 Alberto Giubilini 和 Dominic Wilkinson 提出的几个深思熟虑的意见。