Cantó Olga, Figari Francesco, Fiorio Carlo V, Kuypers Sarah, Marchal Sarah, Romaguera-de-la-Cruz Marina, Tasseva Iva V, Verbist Gerlinde
Universidad de Alcalá and EQUALITAS.
University of Insubria ISER University of Essex CeRP Collegio Carlo Alberto and Dondena Bocconi University.
Rev Income Wealth. 2022 Jun;68(2):293-322. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12530. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
This paper assesses the impact on household incomes of the COVID-19 pandemic and governments' policy responses in April 2020 in four large and severely hit EU countries: Belgium, Italy, Spain and the UK. We provide comparative evidence on the level of relative and absolute welfare resilience at the onset of the pandemic, by creating counterfactual scenarios using the European tax-benefit model EUROMOD combined with COVID-19-related household surveys and timely labor market data. We find that income poverty increased in all countries due to the pandemic while inequality remained broadly the same. Differences in the impact of policies across countries arose from four main sources: the asymmetric dimension of the shock by country, the different protection offered by each tax-benefit system, the diverse design of discretionary measures and differences in the household level circumstances and living arrangements of individuals at risk of income loss in each country.
本文评估了2020年4月新冠疫情及政府政策应对措施对四个受重创的欧盟大国(比利时、意大利、西班牙和英国)家庭收入的影响。我们利用欧洲税收福利模型EUROMOD并结合与新冠疫情相关的家庭调查和及时的劳动力市场数据,创建反事实情景,从而提供有关疫情初期相对和绝对福利恢复力水平的比较证据。我们发现,疫情导致所有国家的收入贫困加剧,而不平等状况大致保持不变。各国政策影响的差异源于四个主要方面:各国冲击的不对称性、每个税收福利体系提供的不同保护、酌情措施的不同设计以及每个面临收入损失风险国家中个人的家庭层面情况和生活安排的差异。