• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情危机期间选民对领导人的看法:关键词描述的定量分析揭示了评价的力度和方向。

Voters' view of leaders during the Covid-19 crisis: Quantitative analysis of keyword descriptions provides strength and direction of evaluations.

作者信息

Fredén Annika, Sikström Sverker

机构信息

Department of Political, Historical, Religious and Cultural Studies Karlstad University Karlstad Sweden.

Department of Psychology Lund University Lund Sweden.

出版信息

Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2170-2183. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13036. Epub 2021 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1111/ssqu.13036
PMID:34548706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8447460/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Previous research suggests that governments usually gain support during crises such as the Covid-19. However, these findings are based on rating scales that only allow us to measure the strength of this support. This article proposes a new measure of how voters evaluate Prime Ministers (PM) by asking for descriptive keywords that are analyzed by natural language processing.

METHODS

By collecting a representative sample of citizens' own key words describing their PM in 15 countries in Europe during the outbreak of Covid-19, and analyzing these by latent semantic analysis and a multiple OLS regression, we could quantify the strength and direction of voters' view.

RESULTS

The strength analysis supported previous studies that describing the PM with positive words was strongly associated with vote intention. Furthermore, a change in the direction of the attitudes from "good" to "honest" was found. A new finding was that the pandemic was associated with an increase in polarization.

CONCLUSIONS

The keyword evaluation analysis provides opportunities of evaluating both strength and direction of voters' view of their PM, where we show new results related to increased polarization and shift in the direction of attitudes.

摘要

目标

先前的研究表明,政府通常在诸如新冠疫情这样的危机期间获得支持。然而,这些发现基于评级量表,而这些量表仅能让我们衡量这种支持的强度。本文提出一种新的衡量方法,通过询问描述性关键词并利用自然语言处理进行分析,来了解选民如何评价总理。

方法

通过收集在新冠疫情爆发期间欧洲15个国家公民描述其总理的代表性关键词样本,并通过潜在语义分析和多元OLS回归对这些关键词进行分析,我们能够量化选民观点的强度和方向。

结果

强度分析支持了先前的研究,即用积极词汇描述总理与投票意向密切相关。此外,还发现了态度方向从“好”到“诚实”的转变。一个新发现是,疫情与两极分化加剧有关。

结论

关键词评估分析为评估选民对其总理观点的强度和方向提供了机会,在此我们展示了与两极分化加剧和态度方向转变相关的新结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/c50af9e8b56b/SSQU-102-2170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/ad0f8b2a2109/SSQU-102-2170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/6d262e356576/SSQU-102-2170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/16cc85f6ea1c/SSQU-102-2170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/c50af9e8b56b/SSQU-102-2170-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/ad0f8b2a2109/SSQU-102-2170-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/6d262e356576/SSQU-102-2170-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/16cc85f6ea1c/SSQU-102-2170-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a18/8447460/c50af9e8b56b/SSQU-102-2170-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Voters' view of leaders during the Covid-19 crisis: Quantitative analysis of keyword descriptions provides strength and direction of evaluations.新冠疫情危机期间选民对领导人的看法:关键词描述的定量分析揭示了评价的力度和方向。
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2170-2183. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13036. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
2
Reevaluating the Influence of Leaders Under Proportional Representation: Quantitative Analysis of Text in an Electoral Experiment.重新评估比例代表制下领导者的影响力:一项选举实验中文本的定量分析
Front Psychol. 2021 May 12;12:604135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604135. eCollection 2021.
3
Personalizing politics: a congruency model of political preference.个性化政治:一种政治偏好的一致性模型。
Am Psychol. 2004 Oct;59(7):581-94. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581.
4
On the nature of voters' coalition preferences.论选民联盟偏好的本质。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):254-273. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2016.1270286. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
5
Political attitude change over time following COVID-19 lockdown: Rallying effects and differences between left and right voters.新冠疫情封锁后政治态度随时间的变化:团结效应以及左右翼选民之间的差异
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1041957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041957. eCollection 2022.
6
Has Pandemic Threat Stoked Xenophobia? How COVID-19 Influences California Voters' Attitudes toward Diversity and Immigration.疫情威胁引发仇外心理了吗?新冠疫情如何影响加利福尼亚州选民对多元化和移民的态度。
Sociol Forum (Randolph N J). 2021 Dec;36(4):889-915. doi: 10.1111/socf.12750. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.单目标内隐联想测验(ST-IAT)可预测瑞士公投中已决定和未决定选民的投票行为。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 12;11(10):e0163872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163872. eCollection 2016.
8
Analysis of crisis communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.澳大利亚总理在新冠疫情期间的危机沟通分析。
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021 Aug;62:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102375. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
9
Reversal of voters' positions since the privatization of spirits sales in Washington State.自华盛顿州酒类销售私有化以来选民立场的转变。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 May 23;19:101112. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101112. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
The costs of electoral fraud: establishing the link between electoral integrity, winning an election, and satisfaction with democracy.选举舞弊的代价:建立选举公正性、赢得选举与对民主满意度之间的联系。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):350-368. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2017.1310111. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Reassessing Gender Differences in COVID-19 Risk Perception and Behavior.重新评估新冠疫情风险认知与行为中的性别差异
Soc Sci Q. 2022 Jan;103(1):31-41. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13116. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
2
Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective.新冠疫情期间的意识形态与对健康指南的遵守:比较视角
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2106-2123. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13035. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Ideology and compliance with health guidelines during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative perspective.新冠疫情期间的意识形态与对健康指南的遵守:比较视角
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2106-2123. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.13035. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Reevaluating the Influence of Leaders Under Proportional Representation: Quantitative Analysis of Text in an Electoral Experiment.重新评估比例代表制下领导者的影响力:一项选举实验中文本的定量分析
Front Psychol. 2021 May 12;12:604135. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604135. eCollection 2021.
3
Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors' recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States.
政治党派偏见影响美国民众对州长新冠防疫建议的行为反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24144-24153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Semantic measures: Using natural language processing to measure, differentiate, and describe psychological constructs.语义测量:使用自然语言处理来测量、区分和描述心理结构。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):92-115. doi: 10.1037/met0000191. Epub 2018 Jul 2.