Bown Chad P, Bollyky Thomas J
Peterson Institute for International Economics Washington District of Columbia USA.
Council on Foreign Relations Washington District of Columbia USA.
World Econ. 2022 Feb;45(2):468-522. doi: 10.1111/twec.13183. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Many months after COVID-19 vaccines were first authorised for public use, still limited supplies could only partially reduce the devastating loss of life and economic costs caused by the pandemic. Could additional vaccine doses have been manufactured more quickly some other way? Would alternative policy choices have made a difference? This paper provides a simple analytical framework through which to view the contours of the vaccine value chain. It then creates a new database that maps the COVID-19 vaccines of Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, AstraZeneca/Oxford, Johnson & Johnson, Novavax and CureVac to the product- and location-specific manufacturing supply chains that emerged in 2020 and 2021. It describes the choppy process through which dozens of other companies at nearly 100 geographically distributed facilities came together to scale up global manufacturing. The paper catalogues major pandemic policy initiatives - such as the United States' Operation Warp Speed - that are likely to have affected the timing and formation of those vaccine supply chains. Given the data, a final section identifies further questions for researchers and policymakers.
在新冠疫苗首次获批供公众使用后的数月里,供应仍然有限,只能部分减少疫情造成的毁灭性生命损失和经济成本。是否可以通过其他方式更快地生产更多疫苗剂量?其他政策选择是否会产生不同的结果?本文提供了一个简单的分析框架,用以审视疫苗价值链的轮廓。然后,创建了一个新数据库,将辉瑞/生物科技、莫德纳、阿斯利康/牛津、强生、诺瓦瓦克斯和 CureVac 的新冠疫苗与 2020 年和 2021 年出现的特定产品和地点的制造供应链进行映射。它描述了数十家其他公司在近 100 个地理分布的设施中共同扩大全球生产的起伏过程。本文列举了可能影响这些疫苗供应链的时间安排和形成的重大疫情政策举措,如美国的“曲速行动”。基于这些数据,最后一部分为研究人员和政策制定者提出了进一步的问题。