Park Jeongsu, Choi Byoungsu, Ko Jaeeun, Chun Jaehee, Park Inkyung, Lee Juyoung, Kim Jayon, Kim Jaehwan, Eom Kidong, Kim Jin Sung
Department of Veterinary Medical Imaging, College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 6;8:721612. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.721612. eCollection 2021.
This study was conducted to develop a deep learning-based automatic segmentation (DLBAS) model of head and neck organs for radiotherapy (RT) in dogs, and to evaluate the feasibility for delineating the RT planning. The segmentation indicated that there were potentially 15 organs at risk (OARs) in the head and neck of dogs. Post-contrast computed tomography (CT) was performed in 90 dogs. The training and validation sets comprised 80 CT data sets, including 20 test sets. The accuracy of the segmentation was assessed using both the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the Hausdorff distance (HD), and by referencing the expert contours as the ground truth. An additional 10 clinical test sets with relatively large displacement or deformation of organs were selected for verification in cancer patients. To evaluate the applicability in cancer patients, and the impact of expert intervention, three methods-HA, DLBAS, and the readjustment of the predicted data obtained via the DLBAS of the clinical test sets (HA_DLBAS)-were compared. The DLBAS model (in the 20 test sets) showed reliable DSC and HD values; it also had a short contouring time of ~3 s. The average (mean ± standard deviation) DSC (0.83 ± 0.04) and HD (2.71 ± 1.01 mm) values were similar to those of previous human studies. The DLBAS was highly accurate and had no large displacement of head and neck organs. However, the DLBAS in the 10 clinical test sets showed lower DSC (0.78 ± 0.11) and higher HD (4.30 ± 3.69 mm) values than those of the test sets. The HA_DLBAS was comparable to both the HA (DSC: 0.85 ± 0.06 and HD: 2.74 ± 1.18 mm) and DLBAS presented better comparison metrics and decreased statistical deviations (DSC: 0.94 ± 0.03 and HD: 2.30 ± 0.41 mm). In addition, the contouring time of HA_DLBAS (30 min) was less than that of HA (80 min). In conclusion, HA_DLBAS method and the proposed DLBAS was highly consistent and robust in its performance. Thus, DLBAS has great potential as a single or supportive tool to the key process in RT planning.
本研究旨在开发一种基于深度学习的犬头部和颈部器官自动分割(DLBAS)模型,用于放射治疗(RT),并评估其在勾画放疗计划方面的可行性。分割结果表明,犬的头部和颈部可能存在15个危及器官(OARs)。对90只犬进行了增强计算机断层扫描(CT)。训练集和验证集包括80个CT数据集,其中20个为测试集。使用骰子相似系数(DSC)和豪斯多夫距离(HD)评估分割的准确性,并将专家轮廓作为参考标准。另外选择10个器官有较大位移或变形的临床测试集用于癌症患者的验证。为了评估其在癌症患者中的适用性以及专家干预的影响,比较了三种方法——手工勾画(HA)、DLBAS以及对临床测试集通过DLBAS获得的预测数据进行重新调整(HA_DLBAS)。DLBAS模型(在20个测试集中)显示出可靠的DSC和HD值;其轮廓勾画时间也较短,约为3秒。平均(均值±标准差)DSC(0.83±0.04)和HD(2.71±1.01毫米)值与先前人类研究的结果相似。DLBAS高度准确,且头部和颈部器官无大的位移。然而,10个临床测试集中的DLBAS显示出比测试集更低的DSC(0.78±0.11)和更高的HD(4.30±3.69毫米)值。HA_DLBAS与HA相当(DSC:0.85±0.06,HD:2.74±1.18毫米),并且呈现出更好的比较指标,统计偏差减小(DSC:0.94±0.03,HD:2.30±0.41毫米)。此外,HA_DLBAS的轮廓勾画时间(30分钟)少于HA(80分钟)。总之,HA_DLBAS方法和所提出的DLBAS在性能上高度一致且稳健。因此,DLBAS作为放疗计划关键过程的单一或辅助工具具有巨大潜力。