Kim Nalee, Chun Jaehee, Chang Jee Suk, Lee Chang Geol, Keum Ki Chang, Kim Jin Sung
Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 9;13(4):702. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040702.
This study investigated the feasibility of deep learning-based segmentation (DLS) and continual training for adaptive radiotherapy (RT) of head and neck (H&N) cancer. One-hundred patients treated with definitive RT were included. Based on 23 organs-at-risk (OARs) manually segmented in initial planning computed tomography (CT), modified FC-DenseNet was trained for DLS: (i) using data obtained from 60 patients, with 20 matched patients in the test set (DLSm); (ii) using data obtained from 60 identical patients with 20 unmatched patients in the test set (DLSu). Manually contoured OARs in adaptive planning CT for independent 20 patients were provided as test sets. Deformable image registration (DIR) was also performed. All 23 OARs were compared using quantitative measurements, and nine OARs were also evaluated via subjective assessment from 26 observers using the Turing test. DLSm achieved better performance than both DLSu and DIR (mean Dice similarity coefficient; 0.83 vs. 0.80 vs. 0.70), mainly for glandular structures, whose volume significantly reduced during RT. Based on subjective measurements, DLS is often perceived as a human (49.2%). Furthermore, DLSm is preferred over DLSu (67.2%) and DIR (96.7%), with a similar rate of required revision to that of manual segmentation (28.0% vs. 29.7%). In conclusion, DLS was effective and preferred over DIR. Additionally, continual DLS training is required for an effective optimization and robustness in personalized adaptive RT.
本研究调查了基于深度学习的分割(DLS)以及对头颈部(H&N)癌进行自适应放疗(RT)的持续训练的可行性。纳入了100例行根治性放疗的患者。基于在初始计划计算机断层扫描(CT)中手动分割的23个危及器官(OAR),对改进的FC-DenseNet进行DLS训练:(i)使用从60例患者获得的数据,测试集中有20例匹配患者(DLSm);(ii)使用从60例相同患者获得的数据,测试集中有20例不匹配患者(DLSu)。将20例独立患者的自适应计划CT中的手动勾勒的OAR作为测试集。还进行了可变形图像配准(DIR)。使用定量测量对所有23个OAR进行比较,并且还通过26名观察者使用图灵测试进行主观评估来评估9个OAR。DLSm的表现优于DLSu和DIR(平均骰子相似系数;0.83对0.80对0.70),主要针对腺体结构,其体积在放疗期间显著减小。基于主观测量,DLS通常被认为与人工分割相当(49.2%)。此外,DLSm比DLSu(67.2%)和DIR(96.7%)更受青睐,所需修正率与手动分割相似(28.0%对29.7%)。总之,DLS是有效的,并且比DIR更受青睐。此外,为了在个性化自适应放疗中实现有效的优化和稳健性,需要进行持续的DLS训练。