• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 EuroForMix 和 STRmix™ 得到的似然比。

A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.

机构信息

Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.

Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2138-2155. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14886. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/1556-4029.14886
PMID:34553371
Abstract

Likelihood ratios (LR) differences between the probabilistic genotyping software EuroForMix and STRmix™ are examined. After considering differences in the allele probabilities, the LRs from both software for an unambiguous single-source profile were identical (four significant figures). LRs from both software for an unambiguous single-source profile with alleles previously unseen in the allele frequency database (rare alleles) were the same (three significant figures) for θ = 0.01. Due to differences in the minimum allele frequencies, the LRs differed by three orders of magnitude when θ = 0. For both software, the LRs for a single-source dilution series decreased as the input amount decreased. The LRs from both software were within an order of magnitude for known contributors. The largest difference was where the target input amount was 0.0156 ng: The LR was 2.1 × 10 and the LR was 8.0 × 10 . Both software show similar LR behavior with respect to mixture ratio. For two person mixtures the LR increases for both the major and the minor as the ratio moves away from 1:1. The LR for the major stabilizes at about 3:1 whereas the LR for the minor reaches its maximum at about 3:1 and then declines. Greater differences in LR were observed between EuroForMix and STRmix™ for mixtures. One-hundred and twenty-nine mixtures from the PROVEDIt dataset were compared. LRs for 84% of the comparisons for known contributors without rare alleles were within two orders of magnitude. Five divergent results were investigated, and a manual intervention approach was applied where appropriate.

摘要

检验了概率基因分型软件 EuroForMix 和 STRmix™之间的似然比 (LR) 差异。在考虑了等位基因概率的差异后,两种软件对于明确的单一来源谱的 LR 是相同的(四位有效数字)。对于θ=0.01,两种软件对于在等位基因频率数据库中以前未见过的等位基因(稀有等位基因)的明确单一来源谱的 LR 相同(三位有效数字)。由于最小等位基因频率的差异,当θ=0 时,LR 相差三个数量级。对于两种软件,单一来源稀释系列的 LR 随着输入量的减少而降低。两种软件的 LR 对于已知贡献者都在一个数量级内。最大的差异出现在目标输入量为 0.0156ng 时:LR 为 2.1×10,LR 为 8.0×10。两种软件在混合比例方面表现出相似的 LR 行为。对于两个人的混合物,随着比例从 1:1 远离,主要和次要的 LR 都增加。主要的 LR 在大约 3:1 处稳定,而次要的 LR 在大约 3:1 处达到最大值,然后下降。在混合物中,EuroForMix 和 STRmix™ 之间观察到更大的 LR 差异。比较了来自 PROVEDIt 数据集的 129 种混合物。对于没有稀有等位基因的已知贡献者的 84%的比较,LR 都在两个数量级内。对五个分歧结果进行了调查,并在适当的情况下应用了手动干预方法。

相似文献

1
A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.比较 EuroForMix 和 STRmix™ 得到的似然比。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2138-2155. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14886. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.法医学遗传证据的量化:定性和定量软件在实际案例样本中获得的结果比较。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022 Jul;59:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102715. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
3
STRmix™ collaborative exercise on DNA mixture interpretation.STRmixTM 合作进行 DNA 混合体解读的演练。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 May;40:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Examining performance and likelihood ratios for two likelihood ratio systems using the PROVEDIt dataset.使用 PROVEDIt 数据集检验两种似然比系统的性能和似然比。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 17;16(9):e0256714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256714. eCollection 2021.
5
'Low' LRs obtained from DNA mixtures: On calibration and discrimination performance of probabilistic genotyping software.从 DNA 混合物中获得的“低” LR 值:关于概率基因分型软件的校准和判别性能。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Nov;73:103099. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103099. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
6
Application of a probabilistic genotyping software to MPS mixture STR data is supported by similar trends in LRs compared with CE data.概率基因分型软件在 MPS 混合 STR 数据中的应用得到了与 CE 数据相似的 LR 趋势的支持。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021 May;52:102489. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102489. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
7
Using the Nondonor Distribution to Improve Communication and Inform Decision Making for Low LRs from Minor Contributors in Mixed DNA Profiles.利用非供体分布提高混合 DNA 图谱中低贡献率小供体的 LR 值的沟通和决策信息。
J Forensic Sci. 2020 Jul;65(4):1072-1084. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14306. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
8
A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.一种新的计算策略,用于预测 SNP 基础法医混合物中证据价值。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0247344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247344. eCollection 2021.
9
Internal validation of STRmix™ - A multi laboratory response to PCAST.STRmix™ 的内部验证——PCAST 的多实验室响应。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 May;34:11-24. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
10
Probabilistic genotyping of single cell replicates from complex DNA mixtures recovers higher contributor LRs than standard analysis.对复杂DNA混合物中的单细胞复制物进行概率基因分型,比标准分析能获得更高的贡献者似然比。
Sci Justice. 2022 Mar;62(2):156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.01.003. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting guidance on population sampling for highly polymorphic STR loci.重新审视高度多态性STR基因座群体抽样指南。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2025 Aug 5;80:103336. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2025.103336.
2
The impact of considering different numbers of contributors in identification problems involving real casework mixture samples.在涉及实际案件混合样本的识别问题中考虑不同数量贡献者的影响。
Int J Legal Med. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s00414-025-03500-7.
3
The impact of parameter variation in the quantification of forensic genetic evidence.
参数变化对法医遗传学证据量化的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):2524. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83841-2.
4
Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019-2022.法医生物学和法医DNA分型的最新进展:国际刑警组织2019 - 2022年综述
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Dec 27;6:100311. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100311. eCollection 2023.
5
A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: , and .概率基因分型系统综述:, 和 。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;12(10):1559. doi: 10.3390/genes12101559.