• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新的计算策略,用于预测 SNP 基础法医混合物中证据价值。

A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Surveillance and Bioethics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0247344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247344. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247344
PMID:34653182
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8519470/
Abstract

This study introduces a methodology for inferring the weight of the evidence (WoE) in the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-typed DNA mixtures of forensic interest. First, we redefined some algebraic formulae to approach the semi-continuous calculation of likelihoods and likelihood ratios (LRs). To address the allelic dropouts, a peak height ratio index ("h," an index of heterozygous state plausibility) was incorporated into semi-continuous formulae to act as a proxy for the "split-drop" model of calculation. Second, the original ratio at which a person of interest (POI) has entered into the mixture was inferred by evaluating the DNA amounts conferred by unique genotypes to any possible permutation of any locus of the typing protocol (unique genotypes are genotypes that appear just once in the relevant permutation). We compared this expected ratio (MRex) to all the mixing ratios emerging at all other permutations of the mixture (MRobs) using several (1 - χ2) tests to evaluate the probability of each permutation to exist in the mixture according to quantitative criteria. At the level of each permutation state, we multiplied the (1 - χ2) value to the genotype frequencies and the h index. All the products of all the permutation states were finally summed to give a likelihood value that accounts for three independent properties of the mixtures. Owing to the (1 - χ2) index and the h index, this approach qualifies as a fully continuous methodology of LR calculation. We compared the MRs and LRs emerging from our methodology to those generated by the EuroForMix software ver. 3.0.3. When the true contributors were tested as POIs, our procedure generated highly discriminant LRs that, unlike EuroForMix, never overcame the corresponding single-source LRs. When false contributors were tested as POIs, we obtained a much lower LR value than that from EuroForMix. These two findings indicate that our computational method is more reliable and realistic than EuroForMix.

摘要

本研究介绍了一种推断法医学感兴趣的单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 型 DNA 混合物中证据权重 (WoE) 的方法。首先,我们重新定义了一些代数公式,以接近似然和似然比 (LR) 的半连续计算。为了解决等位基因丢失问题,我们将峰高比指数(“h”,杂合状态可信度指数)纳入半连续公式中,作为计算“分裂丢失”模型的替代方法。其次,通过评估赋予分型方案任何可能的排列的任何基因座的独特基因型的 DNA 量,推断出感兴趣的个体(POI)进入混合物的原始比例(MRex)(独特基因型是指在相关排列中仅出现一次的基因型)。我们使用几种(1-χ2)检验将这个预期比例(MRex)与混合物中所有其他排列的混合比例(MRobs)进行比较,以根据定量标准评估每个排列存在于混合物中的概率。在每个排列状态的水平上,我们将(1-χ2)值乘以基因型频率和 h 指数。最后,将所有排列状态的乘积相加,得出一个考虑混合物三个独立特性的似然值。由于(1-χ2)指数和 h 指数,这种方法是一种完全连续的 LR 计算方法。我们将我们的方法得出的 MR 和 LR 与 EuroForMix 软件 ver.3.0.3 生成的 MR 和 LR 进行了比较。当真正的贡献者作为 POI 进行测试时,我们的程序生成了高度区分的 LR,与 EuroForMix 不同,这些 LR 从未超过相应的单源 LR。当假贡献者作为 POI 进行测试时,我们得到的 LR 值比 EuroForMix 低得多。这两个发现表明,我们的计算方法比 EuroForMix 更可靠和现实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/828892bf9b7c/pone.0247344.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/c80c47af7dd7/pone.0247344.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/95deff456244/pone.0247344.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/903ed57e3397/pone.0247344.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/b7721f82cde3/pone.0247344.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/d250818a91d7/pone.0247344.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/50f0b8b6beba/pone.0247344.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/9cb2cd280418/pone.0247344.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/055222dedfa0/pone.0247344.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/d7d0571e4e6a/pone.0247344.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/840e20e22208/pone.0247344.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/23467f50f290/pone.0247344.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/77603b621c20/pone.0247344.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/a8815e567e1f/pone.0247344.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/2a2dbf121b16/pone.0247344.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/a9c50844eaa6/pone.0247344.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/acbfc869011c/pone.0247344.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/828892bf9b7c/pone.0247344.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/c80c47af7dd7/pone.0247344.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/95deff456244/pone.0247344.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/903ed57e3397/pone.0247344.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/b7721f82cde3/pone.0247344.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/d250818a91d7/pone.0247344.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/50f0b8b6beba/pone.0247344.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/9cb2cd280418/pone.0247344.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/055222dedfa0/pone.0247344.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/d7d0571e4e6a/pone.0247344.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/840e20e22208/pone.0247344.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/23467f50f290/pone.0247344.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/77603b621c20/pone.0247344.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/a8815e567e1f/pone.0247344.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/2a2dbf121b16/pone.0247344.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/a9c50844eaa6/pone.0247344.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/acbfc869011c/pone.0247344.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6990/8519470/828892bf9b7c/pone.0247344.g017.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel computational strategy to predict the value of the evidence in the SNP-based forensic mixtures.一种新的计算策略,用于预测 SNP 基础法医混合物中证据价值。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 15;16(10):e0247344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247344. eCollection 2021.
2
EuroForMix: An open source software based on a continuous model to evaluate STR DNA profiles from a mixture of contributors with artefacts.EuroForMix:一款基于连续模型的开源软件,用于评估带有假象的混合样本贡献者的STR DNA图谱。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:35-44. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
3
Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing.通过大规模平行测序提高无关或相关供体 DNA 混合物中的个体识别。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Sep;72:103078. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103078. Epub 2024 Jun 12.
4
Development and validation of open-source software for DNA mixture interpretation based on a quantitative continuous model.基于定量连续模型的 DNA 混合物解释开源软件的开发与验证。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 17;12(11):e0188183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188183. eCollection 2017.
5
Validation of a DNA mixture statistics tool incorporating allelic drop-out and drop-in.验证一种包含等位基因缺失和嵌合的 DNA 混合物统计工具。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Dec;6(6):749-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
6
A comparison of likelihood ratios obtained from EuroForMix and STRmix™.比较 EuroForMix 和 STRmix™ 得到的似然比。
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Nov;66(6):2138-2155. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14886. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
7
An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.对源于复杂混合物的似然比的信息含量的评估。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:64-72. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.01.008. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
8
Quantification of forensic genetic evidence: Comparison of results obtained by qualitative and quantitative software for real casework samples.法医学遗传证据的量化:定性和定量软件在实际案例样本中获得的结果比较。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2022 Jul;59:102715. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102715. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
9
CEESIt: A computational tool for the interpretation of STR mixtures.CEESIt:一种用于解释 STR 混合物的计算工具。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 May;22:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
10
Distinguishing between donors and their relatives in complex DNA mixtures with binary models.使用二元模型在复杂DNA混合物中区分捐赠者及其亲属。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.12.001. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
A New Computational Deconvolution Algorithm for the Analysis of Forensic DNA Mixtures with SNP Markers.一种用于分析含 SNP 标记的法医 DNA 混合物的新型计算去卷积算法。
Genes (Basel). 2022 May 15;13(5):884. doi: 10.3390/genes13050884.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of complex DNA mixtures using massively parallel sequencing of SNPs with low minor allele frequencies.使用具有低次要等位基因频率的 SNP 的大规模平行测序分析复杂 DNA 混合物。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2020 May;46:102234. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102234. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
2
The MASTiFF panel-a versatile multiple-allele SNP test for forensics.MASTiFF 面板——一种用于法医的多功能多位点 SNP 测试。
Int J Legal Med. 2020 Mar;134(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s00414-019-02233-8. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
3
The advances in DNA mixture interpretation.
DNA混合样本解释的进展。
Forensic Sci Int. 2019 Aug;301:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 20.
4
Forensic molecular biomarkers for mixture analysis.法医混合物分析中的分子生物标志物。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jul;41:107-119. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
5
The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.用于法医鉴定的QIAGEN 140位点单核苷酸多态性(SNP)面板,采用大规模平行测序(MPS):一项评估及直接PCR试验。
Int J Legal Med. 2019 May;133(3):677-688. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1975-5. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Sequencing of 231 forensic genetic markers using the MiSeq FGx™ forensic genomics system - an evaluation of the assay and software.使用MiSeq FGx™法医基因组学系统对231个法医遗传标记进行测序——检测方法和软件评估
Forensic Sci Res. 2018 Apr 9;3(2):111-123. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1446672. eCollection 2018.
7
Probabilistic genotyping software: An overview.概率基因型分析软件:概述。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019 Jan;38:219-224. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
8
Determination of the possible number of genotypes which can contribute to DNA mixtures: Non-computer assisted deconvolution should not be attempted for greater than two person mixtures.确定可能存在的导致 DNA 混合的基因型数量:对于超过两人混合的情况,不应尝试非计算机辅助的反卷积。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Nov;37:235-240. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
9
Separation/extraction, detection, and interpretation of DNA mixtures in forensic science (review).法医学中DNA混合物的分离/提取、检测及解读(综述)
Int J Legal Med. 2018 Sep;132(5):1247-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1862-0. Epub 2018 May 25.
10
Computation of marginal distributions of peak-heights in electropherograms for analysing single source and mixture STR DNA samples.计算单源和混合 STR DNA 样本电泳图谱中峰高的边缘分布。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018 Jul;35:164-168. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 4.