• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹股沟疝修补术:全球视角。

Inguinal hernia repair: a global perspective.

机构信息

College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2288-2295. doi: 10.1111/ans.17174. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1111/ans.17174
PMID:34553473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common operations performed worldwide with most of the burden of these occurring in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs). There has been much research investigating the most effective method of hernia repair in resource-rich countries, however very little has been done to determine the most cost-beneficial method of hernia repair in LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic review of the English literature through PubMed and Scopus was conducted according to the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria of which 17 were randomised controlled trials and 11 were systematic reviews. Three areas of investigation were established from the literature search, namely operative method and type of mesh used (where applicable). Open-mesh procedures were shown to be less costly and have shorter operative times than laparoscopic methods. People who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair regularly returned to normal activities earlier than those who had open-mesh procedures. However, there was no other difference in complication rates between these two methods. Recent investigations have revealed that sterilised synthetic mosquito net was similar to hernia-specific meshes whilst significantly reducing cost.

CONCLUSION

We postulate that the most cost-beneficial method of hernia repair for implementation in LMICs is using open-mesh procedures with sterilised mosquito net under local anaesthetic. Further cost-benefit research is required in this area.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术是全球最常见的手术之一,其中大部分发生在中低收入国家(LMICs)。已经有很多研究调查了资源丰富国家最有效的疝修补方法,但很少有研究致力于确定 LMICs 中最具成本效益的疝修补方法。

方法

根据 PRISMA 声明,通过 PubMed 和 Scopus 对英文文献进行了系统评价。

结果

28 项研究符合纳入标准,其中 17 项为随机对照试验,11 项为系统评价。从文献检索中确定了三个研究领域,即手术方法和使用的网片类型(如适用)。开放式手术比腹腔镜方法成本更低,手术时间更短。接受腹腔镜疝修补术的患者通常比接受开放式手术的患者更早恢复正常活动。然而,这两种方法的并发症发生率没有其他差异。最近的研究表明,经过消毒的合成蚊帐与专门的疝网片相似,同时显著降低了成本。

结论

我们推测,在 LMICs 中实施最具成本效益的疝修补方法是使用局部麻醉下的开放式手术和经过消毒的蚊帐。在这一领域需要进一步的成本效益研究。

相似文献

1
Inguinal hernia repair: a global perspective.腹股沟疝修补术:全球视角。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Nov;91(11):2288-2295. doi: 10.1111/ans.17174. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
2
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
3
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜技术与开放技术用于腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785.
4
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
5
Open mesh versus non-mesh for repair of femoral and inguinal hernia.开放式补片与非补片用于股疝和腹股沟疝修补术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(4):CD002197. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002197.
6
Inhaled mannitol for cystic fibrosis.吸入用甘露醇治疗囊性纤维化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 9;2(2):CD008649. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008649.pub3.
7
Does the use of hernia mesh in surgical inguinal hernia repairs cause male infertility? A systematic review and descriptive analysis.疝补片在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用是否会导致男性不育?系统评价和描述性分析。
Reprod Health. 2018 Apr 23;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0510-y.
8
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias in India: A systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs from global burden of disease study 1990-2021 with projections to 2031.印度腹股沟疝、股疝和腹疝的负担:对1990 - 2021年全球疾病负担研究中的患病率、发病率、死亡率和伤残调整生命年进行系统分析,并预测至2031年。
Hernia. 2025 May 3;29(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03343-6.
2
Analysis of hospitalization costs in adult inguinal hernia: based on quantile regression model.成人腹股沟疝住院费用分析:基于分位数回归模型。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1969-1978. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03138-1. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
3
Comparing Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
机器人辅助与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cureus. 2024 May 23;16(5):e60959. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60959. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Comment to: The impact of smoking on inguinal hernia repair outcomes: a meta-analysis of multivariable-adjusted studies.对《吸烟对腹股沟疝修补术结局的影响:多变量调整研究的荟萃分析》的评论
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1491-1492. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03097-7. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
5
Long term efficacy of prosthetic inguinal herniorrhaphy concomitant with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.人工腹股沟疝修补术联合机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期疗效。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3169-3174. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04625-3. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
6
The global, regional, and national burden and its trends of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernia from 1990 to 2019: findings from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study - a cross-sectional study.全球、地区和国家腹股沟疝、股疝和腹疝的负担及其趋势:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果——一项横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):333-342. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000217.
7
Comparison of mesh fixation and non-fixation in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a randomized control trial.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中网片固定与非固定的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):5847-5854. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10040-x. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
8
Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production on inguinal hernia surgery in the web of science.科学网中腹股沟疝手术科研产出的文献计量分析
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 22;10:1138805. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1138805. eCollection 2023.
9
Regional block anesthesia for adult patients with inguinal hernia repair: A systematic review.成人腹股沟疝修补术的区域阻滞麻醉:系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30654. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030654.
10
Grand challenges in visceral surgery.内脏外科的重大挑战。
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 25;9:1005046. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005046. eCollection 2022.