University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Florida State University, Tallahassee, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2022 Oct;48(10):1516-1528. doi: 10.1177/01461672211042319. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
The dual-strategies theory of social rank proposes that both dominance and prestige are effective strategies for gaining social rank (i.e., the capacity for influence) in groups. However, the only existing longitudinal investigation of these strategies suggests that, among undergraduate students, only prestige allows people to maintain social rank over time. The current study provides a longitudinal test of dominance and prestige in a context where dominance is more normative: MBA project groups. Among 548 MBA students in 104 groups, peer-rated dominance and prestige predicted gains in social rank over the course of 4 weeks, indicating that both strategies may help people not only gain social rank but also maintain it over time. Furthermore, prestige-but not dominance-led to social rank because of willingly given deference from group members. This confirms a central but thus-far-untested principle of dual-strategies theory: While prestige is based on freely conferred deference, dominance is not.
社会等级的双重策略理论提出,在群体中获得社会等级(即影响力的能力),支配和威望都是有效的策略。然而,对这些策略的唯一现有纵向研究表明,在本科生中,只有威望才能使人们随着时间的推移保持社会等级。本研究在一个更规范的支配地位的背景下,对支配和威望进行了纵向测试:MBA 项目小组。在 104 个小组的 548 名 MBA 学生中,同伴评定的支配力和威望预测了在 4 周内社会等级的提升,表明这两种策略不仅可以帮助人们获得社会等级,而且可以随着时间的推移维持社会等级。此外,威望——而不是支配——导致了社会等级,因为成员们自愿给予了尊重。这证实了双重策略理论的一个核心但迄今为止未经检验的原则:虽然威望是基于自由授予的尊重,但支配不是。