• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与奇克索族公民就基因组研究和生物样本库进行的商讨。

Deliberations About Genomic Research and Biobanks With Citizens of the Chickasaw Nation.

作者信息

Reedy Justin, Blanchard Jessica W, Lund Justin, Spicer Paul G, Byars Christie, Peercy Michael, Saunkeah Bobby, Blacksher Erika

机构信息

Department of Communication and Center for Risk & Crisis Management, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.

Department of Anthropology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2020 May 14;11:466. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00466. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fgene.2020.00466
PMID:32477408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7240027/
Abstract

Amid the rapid growth of precision medicine and biobanking initiatives, there have been few efforts at cataloging the implications of these initiatives for Indigenous communities. A consortium involving a university and three American Indian/Alaska Native (AIAN) community partners is working to promote deliberation and dialog in AIAN communities about the potential benefits and risks of genomic research for those communities. The first of the consortium's three planned deliberations was held in September 2018 with citizens of the Chickasaw Nation, a federally recognized tribe in south-central Oklahoma with a full-service medical center and growing research capacity and oversight. Consortium members and the Chickasaw Nation Department of Health Administration designed a deliberative forum for Chickasaw citizens to consider the potential benefits and risks of participating in genomic research and biobanks. In this manuscript, we describe the deliberative method used in this event and report on the ideas discussed during the tribal citizens' deliberations. Chickasaw citizens identified many risks and benefits associated with genomic research and biobanks, including the potential for medical advancements that might benefit the Chickasaw community as well as the possibility of discrimination against the Chickasaw people. Although participants thought the potential benefits outweighed the potential risks, that moral calculation was contingent on whether control of the research and biobanks rested with Chickasaw leadership, researchers, and citizens.

摘要

在精准医学和生物样本库计划迅速发展的背景下,几乎没有人致力于梳理这些计划对原住民社区的影响。一个由一所大学和三个美国印第安/阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)社区合作伙伴组成的联盟正在努力促进AIAN社区就基因组研究对这些社区的潜在益处和风险进行审议和对话。该联盟计划的三次审议中的第一次于2018年9月与奇克索族公民举行,奇克索族是俄克拉荷马州中南部一个获得联邦承认的部落,拥有一家提供全方位服务的医疗中心,研究能力和监督能力不断增强。联盟成员和奇克索族卫生部行政管理部门为奇克索族公民设计了一个审议论坛,以考虑参与基因组研究和生物样本库的潜在益处和风险。在本手稿中,我们描述了此次活动中使用的审议方法,并报告了部落公民审议期间讨论的想法。奇克索族公民确定了与基因组研究和生物样本库相关的许多风险和益处,包括可能使奇克索族社区受益的医学进步潜力以及对奇克索族人的歧视可能性。尽管参与者认为潜在益处大于潜在风险,但这种道德考量取决于研究和生物样本库的控制权是否掌握在奇克索族领导层、研究人员和公民手中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f41/7240027/62e2145ecb39/fgene-11-00466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f41/7240027/62e2145ecb39/fgene-11-00466-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f41/7240027/62e2145ecb39/fgene-11-00466-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Deliberations About Genomic Research and Biobanks With Citizens of the Chickasaw Nation.与奇克索族公民就基因组研究和生物样本库进行的商讨。
Front Genet. 2020 May 14;11:466. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00466. eCollection 2020.
2
Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States.与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民就基因组学伦理进行的审议:在美国三个部落社区使用的审议模型的改编版。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):164-178. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
3
Collaboration With Tribal Stakeholders to Explore Care for Postpartum Depression in the Chickasaw Nation.与部落利益相关者合作,探索在奇卡索族中为产后抑郁症提供的护理。
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2024 Sep;53(5):491-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Precision medicine research with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Results of a deliberative engagement with tribal leaders.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区的精准医学研究:与部落领袖进行审议性接触的结果。
Genet Med. 2022 Mar;24(3):622-630. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.003. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
5
Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation.部落对精准医学研究的审议:在民主审议设计和评估中解决多样性和不平等问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Jul;17(3):304-316. doi: 10.1177/15562646221081267. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Partnering in research: a national research trial exemplifying effective collaboration with American Indian Nations and the Indian Health Service.研究合作:一项全国性研究试验,例证了与美国印第安部落和印第安卫生服务局的有效协作。
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Dec 15;180(12):1202-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu246. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
Integration of Biobanks in National eHealth Ecosystems Facilitating Long-Term Longitudinal Clinical-Omics Studies and Citizens' Engagement in Research Through eHealthBioR.生物样本库融入国家电子健康生态系统,通过eHealthBioR促进长期纵向临床组学研究及公民参与研究。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Jun 14;3:628646. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.628646. eCollection 2021.
8
Biobanks and the Moral Concerns of Donors: A Democratic Deliberation.生物银行与捐赠者的道德关切:民主审议。
Qual Health Res. 2019 Nov;29(13):1942-1953. doi: 10.1177/1049732318791826. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
9
Formative assessment using social marketing principles to identify health and nutrition perspectives of Native American women living within the Chickasaw Nation boundaries in Oklahoma.运用社会营销原则进行形成性评估,以了解生活在俄克拉荷马州奇卡索族领地内的美洲原住民妇女的健康和营养观点。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011 Jan-Feb;43(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2010.07.002.
10
Genomic Research and American Indian Tribal Communities in Oklahoma: Learning From Past Research Misconduct and Building Future Trusting Partnerships.俄克拉荷马州的基因组研究与美洲印第安部落社区:从过去的研究不当行为中吸取教训并建立未来的互信伙伴关系。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 1;188(7):1206-1212. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz062.

引用本文的文献

1
Trusted partners, community priorities, and data protections: requirements for precision medicine research with Alaska Native peoples.值得信赖的合作伙伴、社区优先事项和数据保护:阿拉斯加原住民精准医学研究的要求。
J Community Genet. 2025 Mar 3. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00779-2.
2
Culturally safe and ethical biomarker and genomic research with Indigenous peoples-a scoping review.与原住民开展具有文化安全性和伦理道德的生物标志物及基因组研究——一项范围综述
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 25;2(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00102-0.
3
Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives on communication and engagement with regard to collecting biospecimens and family health histories for cancer research in a rural Alaska Native community.关于在阿拉斯加农村原住民社区收集用于癌症研究的生物样本和家族健康史方面的沟通与参与视角。
J Community Genet. 2019 Jul;10(3):435-446. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00408-9. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
2
Shortcut to success? Negotiating genetic uniqueness in global biomedicine.走捷径通往成功?在全球生物医学中协商遗传独特性。
Soc Stud Sci. 2018 Oct;48(5):740-761. doi: 10.1177/0306312718801165. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
3
A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities.
定性基因组研究与原住民:参与实践的范围综述。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Oct 17;9(10):e015377. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015377.
4
Genetic research with Indigenous Peoples: perspectives on governance and oversight in the US.对原住民的基因研究:美国治理与监督视角
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Nov 22;8:1286948. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1286948. eCollection 2023.
5
Values and Practices to Strengthen Genetic Research Partnerships with Indigenous Communities.加强与原住民社区遗传研究伙伴关系的价值观和实践。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(4):583-592. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0079.
6
Communicating Precision Medicine Research: Multidisciplinary Teams and Diverse Communities.精准医学研究的沟通:多学科团队与多元群体
Public Health Genomics. 2022 Aug 23:1-9. doi: 10.1159/000525684.
7
Tribal Deliberations about Precision Medicine Research: Addressing Diversity and Inequity in Democratic Deliberation Design and Evaluation.部落对精准医学研究的审议:在民主审议设计和评估中解决多样性和不平等问题。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Jul;17(3):304-316. doi: 10.1177/15562646221081267. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
8
Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity.二十个微生物暴露与社会公平相关的重要研究问题。
mSystems. 2022 Feb 22;7(1):e0124021. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01240-21. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
9
Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.权力共享、能力建设与ELSI中不断演变的角色:本土基因组研究伦理中心
Collaborations (Coral Gables). 2020;3(1). doi: 10.33596/coll.71. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Deliberative Forums to Bolster Tribal Self-Determination.加强部落自决的审议论坛。
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):35-37. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1965247.
促进与原住民社区合作的基因组学研究的伦理框架。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 27;9(1):2957. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3.
4
Navajo Nation reconsiders ban on genetic research.纳瓦霍族重新考虑对基因研究的禁令。
Nature. 2017 Oct 6;550(7675):165-166. doi: 10.1038/nature.2017.22780.
5
Genomics for all in the 21st century?21世纪全民基因组学?
J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):249-251. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0333-5. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Self-reported race and ethnicity of US biobank participants compared to the US Census.将美国生物样本库参与者自我报告的种族和族裔与美国人口普查数据进行比较。
J Community Genet. 2017 Jul;8(3):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0308-6. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
7
Genomics, Health Disparities, and Missed Opportunities for the Nation's Research Agenda.基因组学、健康差异与国家研究议程中错失的机遇。
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1831-1832. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3096.
8
Community recommendations on biobank governance: Results from a deliberative community engagement in California.生物样本库管理的社区建议:加利福尼亚州一次审议性社区参与的结果
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172582. eCollection 2017.
9
Genomics is failing on diversity.基因组学在多样性方面表现不佳。
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):161-164. doi: 10.1038/538161a.
10
Public Health in the Precision-Medicine Era.精准医学时代的公共卫生
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 6;373(6):499-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1506241.