Li Cui, Yang Lili, Liu Xiaoyun, Yang Yuanping, Qin Linjun, Li Da, Liu Guorui
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 2871, Beijing 100085, China.
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Innovation (Camb). 2020 Dec 30;2(1):100075. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2020.100075. eCollection 2021 Feb 28.
Incineration has been the globally controversial and concerned method of solid waste disposal. Energy recovery and volume reduction are the benefits from waste incineration, but risk due to release of persistent organic pollutants is the major public concern in the world. In this study, the emission of organic pollutants including dioxins and polychlorinated naphthalenes from solid waste incineration in China was comprehensively evaluated, and a relationship between energy benefit and pollutant emission was firstly established. The results show that production of medical and industrial waste was smaller than that of municipal waste but yielded comparable or even higher emission of dioxins. The energy benefit-to-emission index for organic pollutants (EBEI) for evaluation of solid waste management on a local or regional scale was proposed. Significant correlations between net energy benefit and pollutant emission for provinces with higher EBEI values were found. Furthermore, higher EBEI values were associated with economic factors while lower values were influenced by emission from incineration of medical and industrial waste. We suggest that an EBEI value of ≥60 can serve as a reference for "profitable" solid waste management, assisting decision making during energy benefit and environmental risk assessment.
焚烧一直是全球备受争议且备受关注的固体废物处理方法。能源回收和体积减小是垃圾焚烧带来的好处,但持久性有机污染物的释放所带来的风险是全球主要的公众关切问题。在本研究中,对中国固体废物焚烧过程中包括二噁英和多氯萘在内的有机污染物排放进行了全面评估,并首次建立了能源效益与污染物排放之间的关系。结果表明,医疗和工业垃圾的产量低于城市垃圾,但二噁英排放量相当甚至更高。提出了用于评估地方或区域尺度固体废物管理的有机污染物能源效益与排放指数(EBEI)。发现EBEI值较高的省份净能源效益与污染物排放之间存在显著相关性。此外,较高的EBEI值与经济因素相关,而较低的值则受医疗和工业垃圾焚烧排放的影响。我们建议EBEI值≥60可作为“盈利性”固体废物管理的参考,有助于在能源效益和环境风险评估过程中进行决策。