Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Biological Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Mar 15;47(6):E222-E232. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004254.
A case-control study.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of two modified laminoplasties (LPs) based on a novel paraspinal approach for treating multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
No laminoplasty through a natural intermuscular plane mimicking Wiltse approach to minimize intraoperative injury to extensor muscles has ever been developed and studied.
Ninety-two patients were enrolled, including patients treated with either modified LP and patients treated with concurrent conventional LP. Operation time, blood loss, and complications were recorded. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by VAS, JOA scores, and recovery rate. Cervical sagittal alignment was measured on cervical radiographs. Spinal canal expansion was assessed on CT scans. Cross-sectional area (CSA) and atrophy rate (AR) of cervical deep extensors were evaluated on MRI.
The average follow-up duration was 33.05, 31.55, 33.02, and 32.52 months, respectively in each group. Compared to concurrent conventional procedure, unilateral muscle-preserving procedure displayed similar, whereas bilateral muscle-preserving procedure showed significantly increased operation time and blood loss; each modified procedure resulted in comparable and satisfied perioperative clinical scores, spinal canal expansion while achieving significantly lower axial pain incidence, better cervical lordosis maintenance, and better deep extensor preservation. AR of deep extensors on the open side was significantly lower than that on the hinge side. Bilateral paraspinal approach demonstrated significantly better muscle-preservation on the open side and increased operation duration, with similar clinical scores, axial pain incidence, cervical lordosis maintenance, and spinal canal expansion compared to unilateral paraspinal approach. Loss of cervical lordosis was strongly correlated with AR of deep extensors.
Paraspinal approach is a good manner to protect deep extensor muscles; the two modified LPs have similar effects on clinical outcomes.Level of Evidence: 3.
病例对照研究。
本研究旨在评估两种基于新型椎旁入路改良椎管成形术治疗多节段颈椎病的疗效。
目前尚未开发和研究过通过模仿 Wiltse 入路的自然肌间平面进行椎管成形术,以最大限度地减少对伸肌的术中损伤。
共纳入 92 例患者,包括接受改良 LP 治疗的患者和同期接受常规 LP 治疗的患者。记录手术时间、出血量和并发症。采用 VAS、JOA 评分和恢复率评估临床疗效。颈椎侧位片测量颈椎矢状位排列。CT 扫描评估椎管扩张。MRI 评估颈椎深部伸肌的横截面积(CSA)和萎缩率(AR)。
每组的平均随访时间分别为 33.05、31.55、33.02 和 32.52 个月。与同期常规手术相比,单侧肌保留术的手术时间和出血量相似,而双侧肌保留术则明显增加;两种改良术式的围手术期临床评分、椎管扩张均相当满意,轴向疼痛发生率较低,颈椎曲度维持较好,深部伸肌保留较好。开放侧深部伸肌的 AR 明显低于铰链侧。双侧椎旁入路在开放侧的肌肉保护效果明显优于单侧椎旁入路,且手术时间延长,与单侧椎旁入路相比,临床评分、轴向疼痛发生率、颈椎曲度维持和椎管扩张相似。颈椎前凸丢失与深部伸肌 AR 呈强相关。
椎旁入路是保护深部伸肌的一种较好方法;两种改良 LP 在临床疗效上有相似的效果。
3 级。