• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

识别并衡量中国后 COVID-19 时代过度预防行为的程度。

Identify and measure the degree of over-prevention behaviors in the post-COVID-19 era in China.

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 13 Hangkong Road, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):1743. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11823-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11823-4
PMID:34563147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8466653/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the spread of vaccines, more and more countries have controlled the outbreak of the COVID-19. In this post-epidemic era, these countries began to revive their economy. However, pollution remains in the environment, and people's physical and psychological health has been under threat due to some over-prevention behaviors. Instruments for governmental agencies to manage these behaviors are not yet available. This study aims to develop a measurement model to identify and measure the degree of over-prevention behaviors during the COVID-19 epidemic in China.

METHODS

A survey online was conducted to collect cognition from 1528 Chinese people, including descriptions of various over-prevention behaviors defined by health authorities. Factor analyses were used to develop the measurement model and test its validity. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to explore demographic characteristics, indicating people who are inclined to exhibit over-prevention behaviors.

RESULTS

Four main factors were extracted to develop the model (eigenvalue = 7.337, 3.157, 1.447, and 1.059, respectively). The overall reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.900), the convergent (AVE > 0.5, CR > 0.8 for each factor) and discriminant validity is good. There is also a good internal consistency among these factors (Cronbach's α = 0.906, 0.852, 0.882, and 0.763, respectively). In Factor 1, gender has a negative effect (Beta = - 0.294, P <  0.05, OR = 0.745), whereas employment has a positive effect. Workers in institutions exhibit the greatest effect (Beta = 0.855, P <  0.001, OR = 2.352). In Factor 2, employment has a negative effect, with workers in institutions exhibit the greatest role (Beta = - 0.963, P <  0.001, OR = 0.382). By contrast, education level has a positive effect (Beta = 0.430, P <  0.001, OR = 1.537). In Factor 3, age plays a negative role (Beta = - 0.128, P < 0.05, OR = 0.880).

CONCLUSIONS

People show a discrepancy in the cognition toward various over-prevention behaviors. The findings may have implications for decision-makers to reduce the contradiction between the epidemic and economic revival via managing these behaviors.

摘要

背景

随着疫苗的普及,越来越多的国家已经控制了 COVID-19 的爆发。在后疫情时代,这些国家开始重振经济。然而,环境污染依然存在,由于一些过度预防行为,人们的身心健康受到威胁。政府机构管理这些行为的手段尚不完善。本研究旨在开发一种测量模型,以识别和衡量中国 COVID-19 疫情期间过度预防行为的程度。

方法

通过在线调查收集了 1528 名中国人的认知数据,包括卫生部门定义的各种过度预防行为的描述。采用因子分析方法开发测量模型并检验其有效性。进行逻辑回归分析以探讨人口统计学特征,表明哪些人更倾向于表现出过度预防行为。

结果

提取了四个主要因素来构建模型(特征值分别为 7.337、3.157、1.447 和 1.059)。模型的整体可靠性(Cronbach's α=0.900)、收敛性(每个因素的 AVE>0.5,CR>0.8)和区分效度良好。这些因素之间也具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α分别为 0.906、0.852、0.882 和 0.763)。在因素 1 中,性别有负向影响(Beta=-0.294,P<0.05,OR=0.745),而就业有正向影响。机构工作者表现出最大的影响(Beta=0.855,P<0.001,OR=2.352)。在因素 2 中,就业有负向影响,机构工作者表现出最大的作用(Beta=-0.963,P<0.001,OR=0.382)。相比之下,教育水平有正向影响(Beta=0.430,P<0.001,OR=1.537)。在因素 3 中,年龄起负向作用(Beta=-0.128,P<0.05,OR=0.880)。

结论

人们对各种过度预防行为的认知存在差异。研究结果可能对决策者通过管理这些行为来减少疫情与经济复苏之间的矛盾具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb79/8466653/08d02d8dace9/12889_2021_11823_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb79/8466653/1c46dd4167a9/12889_2021_11823_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb79/8466653/08d02d8dace9/12889_2021_11823_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb79/8466653/1c46dd4167a9/12889_2021_11823_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb79/8466653/08d02d8dace9/12889_2021_11823_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identify and measure the degree of over-prevention behaviors in the post-COVID-19 era in China.识别并衡量中国后 COVID-19 时代过度预防行为的程度。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):1743. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11823-4.
2
Development and validation of a multi-lingual online questionnaire for surveying the COVID-19 prevention and control measures used in global workplaces.开发并验证了一种多语种在线问卷,用于调查全球工作场所使用的 COVID-19 防控措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12500-w.
3
Impact of the COVID-19 Epidemic on Lifestyle Behaviors and Their Association With Subjective Well-Being Among the General Population in Mainland China: Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情对中国大陆普通人群生活方式行为的影响及其与主观幸福感的关联:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 25;22(8):e21176. doi: 10.2196/21176.
4
Anxiety and Depression Status and Influencing Factors of MSM in the Post-COVID-19 Epidemic Period: A Cross-Sectional Study in Western China.新冠疫情后时期男男性行为者的焦虑和抑郁状况及影响因素:中国西部的一项横断面研究
Am J Mens Health. 2021 Nov-Dec;15(6):15579883211057701. doi: 10.1177/15579883211057701.
5
Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptoms, and association with epidemic-related factors during the epidemic period of COVID-19 among 123,768 workers in China: A large cross-sectional study.在中国,123768 名工人在 COVID-19 流行期间的焦虑和抑郁症状的流行率及与流行相关因素的关系:一项大型横断面研究。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:495-502. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.041. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
Risk Factors of Psychological Responses of Chinese University Students During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Cross-sectional Web-Based Survey Study.新冠疫情期间中国大学生心理反应的风险因素:基于网络的横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 21;23(7):e29312. doi: 10.2196/29312.
7
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Urban Residents Toward COVID-19 in Shaanxi During the Post-lockdown Period.城市居民在后封锁时期对陕西省 COVID-19 的知识、态度和实践。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 20;9:659797. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.659797. eCollection 2021.
8
Relationship Between COVID-19 Infection and Risk Perception, Knowledge, Attitude, and Four Nonpharmaceutical Interventions During the Late Period of the COVID-19 Epidemic in China: Online Cross-Sectional Survey of 8158 Adults.中国新冠疫情后期新冠病毒感染与风险认知、知识、态度及四项非药物干预措施之间的关系:对8158名成年人的在线横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e21372. doi: 10.2196/21372.
9
Effects of Internet Hospital Consultations on Psychological Burdens and Disease Knowledge During the Early Outbreak of COVID-19 in China: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.中国新冠疫情早期互联网医院咨询对心理负担和疾病知识的影响:横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e19551. doi: 10.2196/19551.
10
Design and Psychometric Analysis of the COVID-19 Prevention, Recognition and Home-Management Self-Efficacy Scale.《COVID-19 预防、识别和家庭管理自我效能感量表的设计与心理测量学分析》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 28;17(13):4653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134653.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Mixed Emotions on Consumer Improvisation Behavior in the Environment of COVID-19: The Moderating Effect of Tightness-Looseness Culture.混合情绪对 COVID-19 环境下消费者即兴行为的影响:紧松文化的调节作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417076.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the impact of COVID-19 on the quality of life of the survivors, partners and family members: a cross-sectional international online survey.测量 COVID-19 对幸存者、伴侣和家庭成员生活质量的影响:一项国际横断面在线调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e047680. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047680.
2
Behaviours and attitudes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a cross-national Facebook survey.应对新冠疫情的行为与态度:一项跨国脸书调查的见解
EPJ Data Sci. 2021;10(1):17. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00270-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
3
The Role of Health Surveillance for the SARS-CoV-2 Risk Assessment in the Schools.
健康监测在学校新冠病毒风险评估中的作用
J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Apr 1;63(4):e255-e256. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002170.
4
A Typology of Poles' Attitudes toward COVID-19 during the First Wave of the Pandemic.波兰人在大流行第一波期间对 COVID-19 的态度的类型学。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 19;18(4):2002. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042002.
5
Concerns About Information Regarding COVID-19 on the Internet: Cross-Sectional Study.关于互联网上新冠病毒疾病信息的担忧:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 9;22(11):e20487. doi: 10.2196/20487.
6
The relationship between government trust and preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: Exploring the roles of knowledge and negative emotion.中国 COVID-19 大流行期间政府信任与预防行为之间的关系:探讨知识和负性情绪的作用。
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106288. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106288. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries.物理隔离干预措施与 2019 年冠状病毒病发病率:149 个国家的自然实验。
BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2743.
8
Pregnant women's attitudes and decision-making regarding prenatal Down syndrome screening and diagnosis: scale development and validation.孕妇对唐氏综合征产前筛查和诊断的态度及决策:量表的编制与验证。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):407. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03093-6.
9
Can a virus undermine human rights?病毒会损害人权吗?
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e238-e239. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30092-X. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
First-wave COVID-19 transmissibility and severity in China outside Hubei after control measures, and second-wave scenario planning: a modelling impact assessment.中国湖北省以外地区采取控制措施后第一波 COVID-19 的传染性和严重程度,以及第二波疫情情景规划:模型影响评估。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1382-1393. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30746-7. Epub 2020 Apr 8.