• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

混合效应模型预测:一项蒙特卡洛模拟研究。

Prediction With Mixed Effects Models: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.

作者信息

Mangino Anthony A, Finch W Holmes

机构信息

Ball State University, Teachers College, Muncie, IN, USA.

出版信息

Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Dec;81(6):1118-1142. doi: 10.1177/0013164421992818. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1177/0013164421992818
PMID:34565818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8451021/
Abstract

Oftentimes in many fields of the social and natural sciences, data are obtained within a nested structure (e.g., students within schools). To effectively analyze data with such a structure, multilevel models are frequently employed. The present study utilizes a Monte Carlo simulation to compare several novel multilevel classification algorithms across several varied data conditions for the purpose of prediction. Among these models, the panel neural network and Bayesian generalized mixed effects model (multilevel Bayes) consistently yielded the highest prediction accuracy in test data across nearly all data conditions.

摘要

在社会科学和自然科学的许多领域中,数据常常是在嵌套结构中获取的(例如,学校中的学生)。为了有效地分析具有这种结构的数据,经常会使用多层模型。本研究利用蒙特卡罗模拟,在几种不同的数据条件下比较几种新颖的多层分类算法,以进行预测。在这些模型中,面板神经网络和贝叶斯广义混合效应模型(多层贝叶斯)在几乎所有数据条件下的测试数据中始终产生最高的预测准确率。

相似文献

1
Prediction With Mixed Effects Models: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study.混合效应模型预测:一项蒙特卡洛模拟研究。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Dec;81(6):1118-1142. doi: 10.1177/0013164421992818. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Fixed Effects or Mixed Effects Classifiers? Evidence From Simulated and Archival Data.固定效应还是混合效应分类器?来自模拟数据和存档数据的证据。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Aug;83(4):710-739. doi: 10.1177/00131644221108180. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
3
Incorporating Mobility in Growth Modeling for Multilevel and Longitudinal Item Response Data.将流动性纳入多层次和纵向项目反应数据的增长模型中。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016;51(1):120-37. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1114911.
4
Estimation of Random Coefficient Multilevel Models in the Context of Small Numbers of Level 2 Clusters.小数量二级聚类情况下随机系数多层模型的估计
Educ Psychol Meas. 2019 Apr;79(2):217-248. doi: 10.1177/0013164418773494. Epub 2018 May 8.
5
Fast approximate inference for multivariate longitudinal data.多元纵向数据的快速近似推断
Biostatistics. 2022 Dec 12;24(1):177-192. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxab021.
6
Multilevel and Quasi Monte Carlo Methods for the Calculation of the Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.多层次和拟蒙特卡罗方法在部分完全信息期望值计算中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2022 Feb;42(2):168-181. doi: 10.1177/0272989X211026305. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.小样本中多水平结构方程模型的极大似然估计、加权最小二乘均值和方差估计法以及贝叶斯方法的比较:一项模拟研究
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Sep-Oct;51(5):661-680. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1208074. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
8
A multivariate multilevel Gaussian model with a mixed effects structure in the mean and covariance part.一个在均值和协方差部分具有混合效应结构的多变量多层次高斯模型。
Stat Med. 2014 May 20;33(11):1877-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.6062. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
9
Multilevel Reliability Measures of Latent Scores Within an Item Response Theory Framework.潜在分数的多层次可靠性度量在项目反应理论框架内。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2019 Nov-Dec;54(6):856-881. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2019.1596780. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Predicting motor vehicle collisions using Bayesian neural network models: an empirical analysis.使用贝叶斯神经网络模型预测机动车碰撞:实证分析
Accid Anal Prev. 2007 Sep;39(5):922-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.014. Epub 2007 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification and predictive machine learning models construction of gut microbiota associated with lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer.结直肠癌中与淋巴结转移相关的肠道微生物群的识别及预测性机器学习模型构建
mSystems. 2025 Jul 8:e0033925. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00339-25.
2
Detection of cardiovascular disease cases using advanced tree-based machine learning algorithms.使用先进的基于树的机器学习算法检测心血管疾病病例。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 27;14(1):22230. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72819-9.
3
Identifying Risk Indicators of Cardiovascular Disease in Fasa Cohort Study (FACS): An Application of Generalized Linear Mixed-Model Tree.识别法斯队列研究(FACS)中心血管疾病的风险指标:广义线性混合模型树的应用。
Arch Iran Med. 2024 May 1;27(5):239-247. doi: 10.34172/aim.2024.35.
4
Fixed Effects or Mixed Effects Classifiers? Evidence From Simulated and Archival Data.固定效应还是混合效应分类器?来自模拟数据和存档数据的证据。
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Aug;83(4):710-739. doi: 10.1177/00131644221108180. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
5
A review on longitudinal data analysis with random forest.随机森林的纵向数据分析综述。
Brief Bioinform. 2023 Mar 19;24(2). doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad002.

本文引用的文献

1
Random forests for high-dimensional longitudinal data.随机森林在高维纵向数据中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Jan;30(1):166-184. doi: 10.1177/0962280220946080. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
2
BiMM tree: A decision tree method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.BiMM树:一种用于对聚类和纵向二元结局进行建模的决策树方法。
Commun Stat Simul Comput. 2020;49(4):1004-1023. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2018.1490429. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
3
BiMM forest: A random forest method for modeling clustered and longitudinal binary outcomes.BiMM森林:一种用于对聚类和纵向二元结局进行建模的随机森林方法。
Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2019 Feb 15;185:122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.01.002. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Neural Network Classifiers Estimate Bayesian Probabilities.神经网络分类器估计贝叶斯概率。
Neural Comput. 1991 Winter;3(4):461-483. doi: 10.1162/neco.1991.3.4.461.
5
Suicide Mortality in the United States, 1999-2017.1999 - 2017年美国的自杀死亡率
NCHS Data Brief. 2018 Nov(330):1-8.
6
Mixed effect machine learning: A framework for predicting longitudinal change in hemoglobin A1c.混合效应机器学习:预测血红蛋白 A1c 纵向变化的框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jan;89:56-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Does an uneven sample size distribution across settings matter in cross-classified multilevel modeling? Results of a simulation study.在交叉分类多层模型中,各设置之间样本大小分布不均匀是否重要?一项模拟研究的结果。
Health Place. 2018 Jul;52:121-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
Fixed effects models versus mixed effects models for clustered data: Reviewing the approaches, disentangling the differences, and making recommendations.固定效应模型与混合效应模型在聚类数据中的应用:方法回顾、差异解析与推荐。
Psychol Methods. 2019 Feb;24(1):20-35. doi: 10.1037/met0000182. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
9
Naive Bayes Bearing Fault Diagnosis Based on Enhanced Independence of Data.基于增强数据独立性的朴素贝叶斯轴承故障诊断
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Feb 5;18(2):463. doi: 10.3390/s18020463.
10
Letter to the Editor: Suicide as a complex classification problem: machine learning and related techniques can advance suicide prediction - a reply to Roaldset (2016).致编辑的信:自杀作为一个复杂的分类问题:机器学习及相关技术可推动自杀预测——对罗尔德塞特(2016年)的回应
Psychol Med. 2016 Jul;46(9):2009-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000611. Epub 2016 Apr 19.