• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在预测与COVID-19相关的安全行为方面,社会认知因素比负面情绪更为重要。

Social cognitive factors outweigh negative emotionality in predicting COVID-19 related safety behaviors.

作者信息

Hein Grit, Gamer Matthias, Gall Dominik, Gründahl Marthe, Domschke Katharina, Andreatta Marta, Wieser Matthias J, Pauli Paul

机构信息

Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec;24:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101559. Epub 2021 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101559
PMID:34567955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8450590/
Abstract

Emotion-motivation models propose that behaviors, including health behaviors, should be predicted by the same variables that also predict negative affect since emotional reactions should induce a motivation to avoid threatening situations. In contrast, social cognitive models propose that safety behaviors are predicted by a different set of variables that mainly reflect cognitive and socio-structural aspects. Here, we directly tested these opposing hypotheses in young adults ( = 4134) in the context of COVID-19-related safety behaviors to prevent infections. In each participant, we collected measures of negative affect as well as cognitive and socio-structural variables during the lockdown in the first infection wave in Germany. We found a negative effect of the pandemic on emotional responses. However, this was not the main predictor for young adults' willingness to comply with COVID-19-related safety measures. Instead, individual differences in compliance were mainly predicted by cognitive and socio-structural variables. These results were confirmed in an independent data set. This study shows that individuals scoring high on negative affect during the pandemic are not necessarily more likely to comply with safety regulations. Instead, political measures should focus on cognitive interventions and the societal relevance of the health issue. These findings provide important insights into the basis of health-related concerns and feelings as well as behavioral adaptations.

摘要

情绪-动机模型提出,包括健康行为在内的行为应该由那些同样能预测消极情绪的变量来预测,因为情绪反应应该会引发避免威胁情境的动机。相比之下,社会认知模型提出,安全行为是由另一组主要反映认知和社会结构方面的变量来预测的。在此,我们在与预防感染的新冠疫情相关安全行为的背景下,直接对这些相互对立的假设在年轻人(N = 4134)中进行了测试。在德国第一波感染高峰封锁期间,我们收集了每位参与者的消极情绪以及认知和社会结构变量的测量数据。我们发现疫情对情绪反应有负面影响。然而,这并不是年轻人遵守新冠疫情相关安全措施意愿的主要预测因素。相反,遵守情况的个体差异主要由认知和社会结构变量预测。这些结果在一个独立数据集中得到了证实。这项研究表明,在疫情期间消极情绪得分高的个体不一定更有可能遵守安全规定。相反,政策措施应侧重于认知干预以及健康问题的社会相关性。这些发现为与健康相关的担忧、感受以及行为适应的基础提供了重要见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/8683946/f92242a87fef/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/8683946/1247f24f0b97/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/8683946/f92242a87fef/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/8683946/1247f24f0b97/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61a/8683946/f92242a87fef/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Social cognitive factors outweigh negative emotionality in predicting COVID-19 related safety behaviors.在预测与COVID-19相关的安全行为方面,社会认知因素比负面情绪更为重要。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Dec;24:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101559. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
2
Knowledge, Concerns, and Behaviors of Individuals During the First Week of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic in Italy.意大利人在 2019 冠状病毒病大流行的第一周的知识、担忧和行为。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2015821. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15821.
3
Emotional, Psychological, and Cognitive Changes Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy: Is There an Advantage of Being an Older Adult?意大利在新冠疫情期间的情绪、心理和认知变化:老年人是否具有优势?
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Sep 10;13:712369. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.712369. eCollection 2021.
4
The need for holistic, longitudinal and comparable, real-time assessment of the emotional, behavioral and societal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across nations.需要对新冠疫情在各国造成的情感、行为和社会影响进行全面、纵向、可比的实时评估。
Psychiatriki. 2021 Apr 19;32(1):15-18. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.010. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
Emotions of COVID-19: Content Analysis of Self-Reported Information Using Artificial Intelligence.COVID-19 情绪:使用人工智能进行自我报告信息的内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 30;23(4):e27341. doi: 10.2196/27341.
6
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
7
Effects of Age, Gender, Health Status, and Political Party on COVID-19-Related Concerns and Prevention Behaviors: Results of a Large, Longitudinal Cross-sectional Survey.年龄、性别、健康状况和政党对 COVID-19 相关问题和预防行为的影响:一项大型、纵向横断面调查的结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):e24277. doi: 10.2196/24277.
8
Well-Being and Loneliness in Swiss Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Role of Social Relationships.瑞士老年人在 COVID-19 大流行期间的幸福感和孤独感:社会关系的作用。
Gerontologist. 2021 Feb 23;61(2):240-250. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa194.
9
Motivations for Social Distancing and App Use as Complementary Measures to Combat the COVID-19 Pandemic: Quantitative Survey Study.将社交距离和应用程序使用作为对抗新冠疫情补充措施的动机:定量调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 27;22(8):e21613. doi: 10.2196/21613.
10
Awe/Gratitude as an Experiential Aspect of Spirituality and Its Association to Perceived Positive Changes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.敬畏/感恩作为灵性的一种体验层面及其与 COVID-19 大流行期间感知到的积极变化的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;12:642716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.642716. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
German college students' mental health state and their willingness to use mental health prevention: An online survey during the COVID-19 pandemic.德国大学生的心理健康状况及其使用心理健康预防措施的意愿:COVID-19大流行期间的一项在线调查。
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 31;11(3):e42290. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42290. eCollection 2025 Feb 15.
2
Mental health improvement after the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with psychological distress.新冠疫情后心理困扰人群的心理健康改善。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5685. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55839-3.
3
Fear of COVID-19 among cancer patients in Henan Province, Central China: causes, results, and coping factors.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of cognition and affect on preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study in China.认知和情感对 COVID-19 大流行期间预防行为的影响:中国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 14;21(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10784-y.
2
Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19.COVID-19 期间的生活方式和心理健康紊乱。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Mar 2;118(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016632118.
3
Determinants of Preventive Behaviors in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: Comparing the Sociocultural, Psychosocial, and Social Cognitive Explanations.
中国中部河南省癌症患者对新冠病毒的恐惧:原因、结果及应对因素
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 16;14:1122894. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122894. eCollection 2023.
4
Longitudinal trajectories of coronavirus anxiety and health behavior use before and after the U.S. 2020 presidential election: The effects of political orientation.2020 年美国总统大选前后冠状病毒焦虑和健康行为使用的纵向轨迹:政治取向的影响。
J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Dec;92:102643. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102643. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
法国应对新冠疫情的预防行为决定因素:比较社会文化、心理社会和社会认知解释
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 30;11:584500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584500. eCollection 2020.
4
Assessing the age specificity of infection fatality rates for COVID-19: systematic review, meta-analysis, and public policy implications.评估 COVID-19 感染病死率的年龄特异性:系统评价、荟萃分析及公共政策意义。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2020 Dec;35(12):1123-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00698-1. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
5
Psychological, addictive, and health behavior implications of the COVID-19 pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对心理、成瘾及健康行为的影响
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Nov;134:103715. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103715. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
6
Predictors of COVID-19 voluntary compliance behaviors: An international investigation.新冠疫情自愿遵守行为的预测因素:一项国际调查。
Glob Transit. 2020;2:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
7
The Effect of Social Support on Mental Health in Chinese Adolescents During the Outbreak of COVID-19.新冠疫情期间社会支持对中国青少年心理健康的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Oct;67(4):514-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Aug 1.
8
Coping and tolerance of uncertainty: Predictors and mediators of mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.应对和容忍不确定性:新冠疫情期间心理健康的预测因素和中介因素。
Am Psychol. 2021 Apr;76(3):427-437. doi: 10.1037/amp0000710. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
Health anxiety, cyberchondria, and coping in the current COVID-19 pandemic: Which factors are related to coronavirus anxiety?在当前 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康焦虑、网络疑病症和应对方式:哪些因素与冠状病毒焦虑有关?
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Jun;73:102239. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102239. Epub 2020 May 20.
10
Intolerance of Uncertainty and Mental Wellbeing: Serial Mediation by Rumination and Fear of COVID-19.不确定性不耐受与心理健康:沉思和对新冠病毒的恐惧的系列中介作用
Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;20(5):2731-2742. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00305-0. Epub 2020 May 15.