• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethics of artificial intelligence in global health: Explainability, algorithmic bias and trust.全球健康领域人工智能的伦理:可解释性、算法偏差与信任
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;11(4):612-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
2
Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review and thematic analysis.多利益相关方对人工智能在医疗保健中的应用的偏好:系统评价和主题分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Dec;338:116357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
3
Addressing Fairness, Bias, and Appropriate Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Global Health.解决全球卫生领域中人工智能和机器学习的公平性、偏见及合理使用问题。
Front Artif Intell. 2021 Apr 15;3:561802. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.561802. eCollection 2020.
4
Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature.促进健康的人工智能:伦理文献的范围综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Feb 15;22(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00577-8.
5
"Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations.仅仅是“准确性”吗?程序公平性要求在基于人工智能的医疗资源分配中具备可解释性。
AI Soc. 2022 Dec 21:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00146-022-01614-9.
6
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
7
Gaps in the Global Regulatory Frameworks for the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Healthcare Services Sector and Key Recommendations.医疗服务领域使用人工智能(AI)的全球监管框架中的差距及关键建议。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;12(17):1730. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12171730.
8
A healthy debate: Exploring the views of medical doctors on the ethics of artificial intelligence.一场健康的辩论:探索医生对人工智能伦理的看法。
Artif Intell Med. 2021 Nov;121:102190. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102190. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
9
Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review.人工智能和机器人技术在医疗保健中的伦理问题:综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Dec 15;102(50):e36671. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036671.
10
Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.值得信赖的人工智能和道德设计:公众对基于人工智能的决策支持工具在产时护理背景下的可信度的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 20;24(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00917-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of generative AI for the assessment and treatment of autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review.生成式人工智能在自闭症谱系障碍评估与治疗中的应用:一项范围综述
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 22;16:1628216. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1628216. eCollection 2025.
2
AI-Y: An AI Checklist for Population Ethics Across the Global Context.AI - Y:全球背景下人口伦理学的人工智能清单
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2025;12(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s40471-025-00362-w. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
3
Regulation of artificial intelligence in Uganda's healthcare: exploring an appropriate regulatory approach and framework to deliver universal health coverage.乌干达医疗保健领域人工智能的监管:探索一种适当的监管方法和框架以实现全民健康覆盖。
Int J Equity Health. 2025 May 30;24(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02513-3.
4
Validation, bias assessment, and optimization of the UNAFIED 2-year risk prediction model for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation using national electronic health data.使用国家电子健康数据对未诊断心房颤动的UNAFIED 2年风险预测模型进行验证、偏倚评估和优化。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Sep 26;5(12):925-935. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.09.010. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
The ethical requirement of explainability for AI-DSS in healthcare: a systematic review of reasons.医疗保健中人工智能决策支持系统(AI-DSS)可解释性的伦理要求:原因的系统综述
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Oct 1;25(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01103-2.
6
Ethical Considerations and Equipoise in Cancer Surgery.癌症手术中的伦理考量与 equipoise(此处equipoise 可能是专业术语,暂保留英文,未查到确切对应中文释义)
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep;15(Suppl 3):363-373. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02023-8. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
7
Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in Diagnosing Heart Failure: A Narrative Review.人工智能及其在心力衰竭诊断中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
Cureus. 2024 May 5;16(5):e59661. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59661. eCollection 2024 May.
8
Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices.拨开迷雾:关于围绕人工智能医疗设备的伦理问题的范围界定文献综述
J Pers Med. 2024 Apr 23;14(5):443. doi: 10.3390/jpm14050443.
9
Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI.评估药物流产信息的准确性:ChatGPT与谷歌巴德人工智能的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Jan 2;16(1):e51544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51544. eCollection 2024 Jan.
10
An introduction to digital determinants of health.健康数字决定因素介绍。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Jan 4;3(1):e0000346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000346. eCollection 2024 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.人工智能在医疗保健中的可解释性:多学科视角。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01332-6.
2
Artificial intelligence and the future of global health.人工智能与全球健康的未来。
Lancet. 2020 May 16;395(10236):1579-1586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30226-9.
3
Artificial intelligence and the ongoing need for empathy, compassion and trust in healthcare.人工智能与医疗保健中同理心、同情心和信任的持续需求。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Apr 1;98(4):245-250. doi: 10.2471/BLT.19.237198. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Global Health -A Framework and Strategy for Adoption and Sustainability.全球健康领域的人工智能——采用与可持续性的框架和战略。
Int J MCH AIDS. 2020;9(1):121-127. doi: 10.21106/ijma.296. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
5
The Ethics of Medical AI and the Physician-Patient Relationship.医疗 AI 的伦理与医患关系
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2020 Jan;29(1):115-121. doi: 10.1017/S0963180119000847.
6
On the ethics of algorithmic decision-making in healthcare.论医疗保健中算法决策的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Mar;46(3):205-211. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105586. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
7
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations.剖析用于管理人群健康的算法中的种族偏见。
Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. doi: 10.1126/science.aax2342.
8
The role of trust in global health research collaborations.信任在全球健康研究合作中的作用。
Bioethics. 2019 May;33(4):495-501. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12536. Epub 2018 Nov 27.
9
Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI.计算机最懂?医疗 AI 需要价值灵活性。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;45(3):156-160. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105118. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: how can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings?人工智能与全球健康:人工智能如何助力资源匮乏地区的健康事业?
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Aug 29;3(4):e000798. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000798. eCollection 2018.

全球健康领域人工智能的伦理:可解释性、算法偏差与信任

Ethics of artificial intelligence in global health: Explainability, algorithmic bias and trust.

作者信息

Kerasidou Angeliki

机构信息

The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021 Oct-Dec;11(4):612-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jobcr.2021.09.004
PMID:34567966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8449079/
Abstract

AI has the potential to disrupt and transform the way we deliver care globally. It is reputed to be able to improve the accuracy of diagnoses and treatments, and make the provision of services more efficient and effective. In surgery, AI systems could lead to more accurate diagnoses of health problems and help surgeons better care for their patients. In the context of lower-and-middle-income-countries (LMICs), where access to healthcare still remains a global problem, AI could facilitate access to healthcare professionals and services, even specialist services, for millions of people. The ability of AI to deliver on its promises, however, depends on successfully resolving the ethical and practical issues identified, including that of explainability and algorithmic bias. Even though such issues might appear as being merely practical or technical ones, their closer examination uncovers questions of value, fairness and trust. It should not be left to AI developers, being research institutions or global tech companies, to decide how to resolve these ethical questions. Particularly, relying only on the trustworthiness of companies and institutions to address ethical issues relating to justice, fairness and health equality would be unsuitable and unwise. The pathway to a fair, appropriate and relevant AI necessitates the development, and critically, successful implementation of national and international rules and regulations that define the parameters and set the boundaries of operation and engagement.

摘要

人工智能有潜力扰乱并改变我们在全球提供医疗服务的方式。它被誉为能够提高诊断和治疗的准确性,并使服务的提供更加高效和有效。在外科手术中,人工智能系统可以更准确地诊断健康问题,并帮助外科医生更好地照顾患者。在中低收入国家(LMICs),获得医疗保健仍然是一个全球性问题,人工智能可以为数百万人提供获得医疗专业人员和服务的便利,甚至是专科服务。然而,人工智能能否兑现其承诺,取决于能否成功解决所确定的伦理和实际问题,包括可解释性和算法偏差问题。尽管这些问题可能看起来只是实际或技术问题,但仔细审视会发现价值、公平和信任问题。解决这些伦理问题不应留给人工智能开发者,即研究机构或全球科技公司。特别是,仅依靠公司和机构的可信度来解决与正义、公平和健康平等相关的伦理问题是不合适和不明智的。实现公平、适当和相关的人工智能的途径需要制定并至关重要的是成功实施国家和国际规则与条例,这些规则与条例界定参数并设定操作和参与的界限。