• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估澳大利亚针对遗传性疾病的基因和基因组检测:从卫生技术评估中吸取的经验教训。

Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments.

作者信息

Norris Sarah, Belcher Andrea, Howard Kirsten, Ward Robyn L

机构信息

Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics and School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia.

出版信息

J Community Genet. 2022 Oct;13(5):503-522. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2
PMID:34570356
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9530105/
Abstract

The Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC) is an independent non-statutory committee established by the Australian government to provide recommendations on public reimbursement of technologies and services, other than pharmaceuticals. MSAC has established approaches for undertaking health technology assessment (HTA) of investigative services and codependent technologies. In 2016, MSAC published its clinical utility card (CUC) Proforma, an additional tool to guide assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions. We undertook a review and narrative synthesis of information extracted from all MSAC assessments of genetic testing for heritable conditions completed since 2016, regardless of the HTA approach taken. Ten assessments met our inclusion criteria, covering a range of testing methods (from gene panels to whole-exome sequencing) and purposes (including molecular diagnosis, genetic risk assessment, identification of congenital anomaly syndromes, and carrier screening). This analysis identified a range of methodological and policy challenges such as how to incorporate patient and societal preferences for the health and non-health outcomes of genomic testing, how best to capture the concept of co-production of utility, and how to engage clinicians as referrers for genomics tests whilst at the same time ensuring equity of access to a geographically dispersed population. A further challenge related to how qualitative assessments of patient and community needs influenced the evidence thresholds against which decisions were made. These concepts should be considered for incorporation within the value assessment frameworks used by HTA agencies around the world.

摘要

医疗服务咨询委员会(MSAC)是澳大利亚政府设立的一个独立的非法定委员会,旨在就除药品以外的技术和服务的公共报销提供建议。MSAC已经制定了对调查性服务和相互依存技术进行卫生技术评估(HTA)的方法。2016年,MSAC发布了其临床效用卡(CUC)模板,这是一种指导遗传性疾病基因检测评估的额外工具。我们对自2016年以来完成的所有MSAC遗传性疾病基因检测评估中提取的信息进行了综述和叙述性综合,无论采用何种HTA方法。十项评估符合我们的纳入标准,涵盖了一系列检测方法(从基因检测板到全外显子测序)和目的(包括分子诊断、遗传风险评估、先天性异常综合征的识别以及携带者筛查)。该分析确定了一系列方法和政策挑战,例如如何将患者和社会对基因组检测的健康和非健康结果的偏好纳入其中,如何最好地体现效用共同生产的概念,以及如何让临床医生作为基因组检测的推荐者参与其中,同时确保地理上分散的人群能够公平获得检测。另一个挑战涉及患者和社区需求的定性评估如何影响做出决策所依据的证据阈值。世界各地的HTA机构在其使用的价值评估框架中应考虑纳入这些概念。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/9fd2110b62d9/12687_2021_551_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/3ab01de63cd4/12687_2021_551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/242de4d6617c/12687_2021_551_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/9fd2110b62d9/12687_2021_551_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/3ab01de63cd4/12687_2021_551_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/242de4d6617c/12687_2021_551_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0cd/9530105/9fd2110b62d9/12687_2021_551_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating genetic and genomic tests for heritable conditions in Australia: lessons learnt from health technology assessments.评估澳大利亚针对遗传性疾病的基因和基因组检测:从卫生技术评估中吸取的经验教训。
J Community Genet. 2022 Oct;13(5):503-522. doi: 10.1007/s12687-021-00551-2. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Health technology assessment in Australia: a role for clinical registries?澳大利亚的卫生技术评估:临床注册登记处能发挥作用吗?
Aust Health Rev. 2017 Mar;41(1):19-25. doi: 10.1071/AH15109.
3
Health Technology Assessment in Australia: The Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee and Medical Services Advisory Committee.澳大利亚的卫生技术评估:药品福利咨询委员会和医疗服务咨询委员会。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2021 May;24:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2020.09.001. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
4
QUALITY OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS PREPARED FOR THE MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE.为医疗服务咨询委员会编制的卫生技术评估报告的质量。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(4):315-323. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000477. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
5
An evaluation of methods used in health technology assessments produced for the Medical Services Advisory Committee.对为医疗服务咨询委员会制作的卫生技术评估中所使用方法的评估。
Med J Aust. 2007 Sep 3;187(5):289-92. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2007.tb01246.x.
6
Genome-Wide Sequencing for Unexplained Developmental Disabilities or Multiple Congenital Anomalies: A Health Technology Assessment.不明原因发育障碍或多发先天性异常的全基因组测序:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(11):1-178. eCollection 2020.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.五个司法管辖区的比较有效性研究的国际比较:对美国的启示。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000.
9
The impact of orthopaedic research evidence on health financing in Australia.澳大利亚骨科研究证据对卫生筹资的影响。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 2;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0314-0.
10
Evidence-based funding of new imaging applications and technologies by Medicare in Australia: How it happens and how it can be improved.澳大利亚医保对新影像应用和技术的循证资金资助:其实施方式和改进途径。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar;66(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13386.

引用本文的文献

1
Weighing the evidence on costs and benefits of polygenic risk-based approaches in clinical practice: A systematic review of economic evaluations.权衡临床实践中基于多基因风险方法的成本与效益证据:经济评估的系统综述
Am J Hum Genet. 2025 Aug 7;112(8):1735-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.05.012. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Utilisation of subsidised genetic and genomic testing in a publicly funded healthcare system 2014-2023.2014 - 2023年在公共资助的医疗保健系统中使用补贴的基因和基因组检测
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Feb 5. doi: 10.1038/s41431-025-01801-4.
3
Paving the path for implementation of clinical genomic sequencing globally: Are we ready?

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review of the Value Assessment Frameworks Used within Health Technology Assessment of Omics Technologies and Their Actual Adoption from HTA Agencies.系统评价在组学技术卫生技术评估中使用的价值评估框架及其在 HTA 机构中的实际应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;17(21):8001. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218001.
2
Neonatal and carrier screening for rare diseases: how innovation challenges screening criteria worldwide.罕见病的新生儿筛查和携带者筛查:创新如何在全球范围内挑战筛查标准。
J Community Genet. 2021 Apr;12(2):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s12687-020-00488-y. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
The value of genomic sequencing in complex pediatric neurological disorders: a discrete choice experiment.
为全球临床基因组测序的实施铺平道路:我们准备好了吗?
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Apr 29;2(5):qxae053. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae053. eCollection 2024 May.
4
HTA community perspectives on the use of patient preference information: lessons learned from a survey with members of HTA bodies.HTA 社区对患者偏好信息使用的观点:从 HTA 机构成员调查中获得的经验教训。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Mar 5;40(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000138.
5
QALYs and rare diseases: exploring the responsiveness of SF-6D, EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D following genomic testing for childhood and adult-onset rare genetic conditions in Australia.健康效用值(QALYs)与罕见病:澳大利亚儿童和成人发病罕见遗传疾病基因检测后 SF-6D、EQ-5D-5L 和 AQoL-8D 的反应性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Dec 12;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02216-9.
6
The clinical utility and costs of whole-genome sequencing to detect cancer susceptibility variants-a multi-site prospective cohort study.全基因组测序检测癌症易感性变异的临床实用性和成本:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Genome Med. 2023 Sep 19;15(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13073-023-01223-1.
7
Resource allocation in genetic and genomic medicine.遗传与基因组医学中的资源分配
J Community Genet. 2022 Oct;13(5):463-466. doi: 10.1007/s12687-022-00608-w.
8
Patient and Clinician Preferences for Genetic and Genomic Testing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment.非小细胞肺癌患者和临床医生对基因和基因组检测的偏好:一项离散选择实验
J Pers Med. 2022 May 26;12(6):879. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060879.
基因组测序在复杂儿科神经疾病中的价值:离散选择实验。
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):155-162. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00949-2. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
4
Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing.生活质量驱动患者对基因组测序二级发现的偏好。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Sep;28(9):1178-1186. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0640-x. Epub 2020 May 18.
5
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration.新的健康技术评估定义:国际合作的里程碑。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000215. Epub 2020 May 13.
6
The personal utility and uptake of genomic sequencing in pediatric and adult conditions: eliciting societal preferences with three discrete choice experiments.个人效用和基因组测序在儿科和成人疾病中的应用:通过三个离散选择实验得出社会偏好。
Genet Med. 2020 Aug;22(8):1311-1319. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0809-2. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Are There Different Evidence Thresholds for Genomic Versus Clinical Precision Medicine? A Value of Information-Based Framework Applied to Antiplatelet Drug Therapy.是否存在基因组学与临床精准医学的不同证据门槛?基于信息价值的框架在抗血小板药物治疗中的应用。
Value Health. 2019 Sep;22(9):988-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
8
Allocating healthcare resources to genomic testing in Canada: latest evidence and current challenges.加拿大医疗保健资源在基因检测方面的分配:最新证据与当前挑战
J Community Genet. 2022 Oct;13(5):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00428-5. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
9
Valuation of Health and Nonhealth Outcomes from Next-Generation Sequencing: Approaches, Challenges, and Solutions.下一代测序的健康和非健康结果的评估:方法、挑战和解决方案。
Value Health. 2018 Sep;21(9):1043-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
10
Methodological Issues in Assessing the Economic Value of Next-Generation Sequencing Tests: Many Challenges and Not Enough Solutions.评估下一代测序测试的经济价值的方法学问题:挑战重重,解决方案不足。
Value Health. 2018 Sep;21(9):1033-1042. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Aug 8.