South Carolina SmartState Center for Health Care Quality, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Department of Health Promotion, Education & Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 15;18(18):9715. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189715.
Black men who have sex with men (BMSM) living in the United States (U.S.) South are disproportionately affected by HIV and experience significant disparities in HIV incidence, access to HIV care, and prevention across ages and socio-economic statuses. The aim of this commentary is to critically review current literature on the state of PrEP use among BMSM in the U.S. South, including identifying barriers and facilitators to PrEP use in order to inform intervention development. Extant literature shows that despite the documented benefits of PrEP as an effective HIV-prevention method, its uptake among BMSM is limited across the U.S. South. Common barriers to PrEP uptake included stigma, homophobia, mistrust of healthcare systems, negative attitudes from healthcare providers, access and transportation issues, poverty, and misinformation about PrEP. These barriers are likely to have been further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Limited access to PrEP and other HIV-prevention programs, such as HIV testing, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and condoms for BMSM are likely increase HIV incidence in this community. Moreover, the rapid expansion of telehealth services during the COVID-19 period may offer increased opportunity to scale-up PrEP through telehealth interventions, especially if in-person services remain limited due to pandemic precautions. Given the intersectional barriers that limit the access and uptake of PrEP among BMSM, we suggest that tailored programs or interventions that seek to address PrEP disparities among Southern BMSM should adopt intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches to better understand the complex challenges of scaling up PrEP. More studies are needed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on HIV-prevention services among BMSM and to understand how to co-develop-with the BMSM community and healthcare providers-culturally acceptable interventions to reduce the identified challenges using intersectional and interdisciplinary approaches.
生活在美国南部的与男性发生性关系的黑人男性(BMSM)不成比例地受到 HIV 的影响,并在年龄和社会经济地位方面在 HIV 发病率、获得 HIV 护理和预防方面存在显著差异。本评论的目的是批判性地回顾美国南部 BMSM 使用 PrEP 的现有文献,包括确定使用 PrEP 的障碍和促进因素,以便为干预措施的制定提供信息。现有文献表明,尽管 PrEP 作为一种有效的 HIV 预防方法具有已记录的益处,但在美国南部,BMSM 对 PrEP 的接受程度有限。采用 PrEP 的常见障碍包括耻辱感、恐同、对医疗保健系统的不信任、医疗保健提供者的负面态度、获取和交通问题、贫困以及对 PrEP 的错误信息。这些障碍可能因 COVID-19 大流行而进一步加剧。BMSM 获得 PrEP 和其他 HIV 预防计划(如 HIV 检测、暴露后预防 (PEP) 和避孕套)的机会有限,可能会增加该社区的 HIV 发病率。此外,在 COVID-19 期间,远程医疗服务的迅速扩展可能会通过远程医疗干预措施提供更多扩大 PrEP 的机会,特别是如果由于大流行预防措施而限制了面对面服务。鉴于限制 BMSM 获得和采用 PrEP 的交叉障碍,我们建议针对南方 BMSM 采用交叉和跨学科方法来解决 PrEP 差异的量身定制的计划或干预措施,以更好地了解扩大 PrEP 的复杂挑战。需要更多的研究来调查 COVID-19 对 BMSM 中 HIV 预防服务的影响,并了解如何与 BMSM 社区和医疗保健提供者共同开发文化上可接受的干预措施,以利用交叉和跨学科方法来减少已确定的挑战。