Tribst João Paulo Mendes, Dos Santos Alison Flavio Campos, da Cruz Santos Giuliane, da Silva Leite Larissa Sandy, Lozada Julio Chávez, Silva-Concílio Laís Regiane, Baroudi Kusai, Amaral Marina
Department of Dentistry, University of Taubaté (UNITAU), Taubaté 12020-340, Brazil.
Department of Operative Dentistry, FO-National University of Córdoba, Córdoba 5016, Argentina.
Materials (Basel). 2021 Sep 8;14(18):5153. doi: 10.3390/ma14185153.
This study tested whether three different cement layer thicknesses (60, 120 and 180 μm) would provide the same bonding capacity between adhesively luted lithium disilicate and human dentin. Ceramic blocks were cut to 20 blocks with a low-speed diamond saw under cooling water and were then cemented to human flat dentin with an adhesive protocol. The assembly was sectioned into 1 mm cross-section beams composed of ceramic/cement/dentin. Cement layer thickness was measured, and three groups were formed. Half of the samples were immediately tested to evaluate the short-term bond strength and the other half were submitted to an aging simulation. The microtensile test was performed in a universal testing machine, and the bond strength (MPa) was calculated. The fractured specimens were examined under stereomicroscopy. Applying the finite element method, the residual stress of polymerization shrinkage according to cement layer thickness was also calculated using first principal stress as analysis criteria. Kruskal-Wallis tests showed that the ''cement layer thickness'' factor significantly influenced the bond strength results for the aged samples ( = 0.028); however, no statistically significant difference was found between the immediately tested groups ( = 0.569). The higher the cement layer thickness, the higher the residual stress generated at the adhesive interface due to cement polymerization shrinkage. In conclusion, the cement layer thickness does not affect the immediate bond strength in lithium disilicate restorations; however, thinner cement layers are most stable in the short term, showing constant bond strength and lower residual stress.
本研究测试了三种不同的粘结剂层厚度(60、120和180μm)在粘结锂基二硅酸盐与人类牙本质之间是否能提供相同的粘结能力。用低速金刚石锯在冷却水冷却下将陶瓷块切割成20个块,然后按照粘结方案粘结到人类平坦牙本质上。将组件切成由陶瓷/粘结剂/牙本质组成的1mm横截面梁。测量粘结剂层厚度,并形成三组。一半样品立即进行测试以评估短期粘结强度,另一半样品进行老化模拟。在万能试验机上进行微拉伸试验,并计算粘结强度(MPa)。在体视显微镜下检查断裂的试样。应用有限元方法,以第一主应力为分析标准,计算了根据粘结剂层厚度的聚合收缩残余应力。Kruskal-Wallis检验表明,“粘结剂层厚度”因素对老化样品的粘结强度结果有显著影响(P = 0.028);然而,在立即测试的组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.569)。粘结剂层厚度越高,由于粘结剂聚合收缩在粘结界面产生的残余应力越高。总之,粘结剂层厚度不影响锂基二硅酸盐修复体的即时粘结强度;然而,较薄的粘结剂层在短期内最稳定,表现出恒定的粘结强度和较低的残余应力。