Suppr超能文献

新冠疫苗捐赠——疫苗同理心还是疫苗外交?叙事性文献综述

COVID-19 Vaccine Donations-Vaccine Empathy or Vaccine Diplomacy? A Narrative Literature Review.

作者信息

Su Zhaohui, McDonnell Dean, Li Xiaoshan, Bennett Bindi, Šegalo Sabina, Abbas Jaffar, Cheshmehzangi Ali, Xiang Yu-Tao

机构信息

Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, Mays Cancer Center, School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

Department of Humanities, Institute of Technology, R93 V960 Carlow, Ireland.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;9(9):1024. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9091024.

Abstract

Vaccine inequality inflames the COVID-19 pandemic. Ensuring equitable immunization, vaccine empathy is needed to boost vaccine donations among capable countries. However, damaging narratives built around vaccine donations such as "vaccine diplomacy" could undermine nations' willingness to donate their vaccines, which, in turn, further exacerbate global vaccine inequality. However, while discussions on vaccine diplomacy are on the rise, there is limited research related to vaccine diplomacy, especially in terms of its characteristics and effects on vaccine distribution vis-à-vis vaccine empathy. Thus, to bridge the research gap, this study aims to examine the defining attributes of vaccine diplomacy and its potential effects on COVID-19 immunization, particularly in light of vaccine empathy. A narrative review was conducted to shed light on vaccine diplomacy's defining attributes and effects in the context of COVID-19 vaccine distribution and dissemination. Databases such as PubMed and Medline were utilized for literature search. Additionally, to ensure up-to-date insights are included in the review, validated reports and reverse tracing of eligible articles' reference lists in Google Scholar have also been conducted to locate relevant records. Vaccine empathy is an individual or a nation's capability to sympathize with other individuals or nations' vaccine wants and needs, whereas vaccine diplomacy is a nation's vaccine efforts that aim to build mutually beneficial relationships with other nations ultimately. Our findings show that while both vaccine empathy and vaccine diplomacy have their strengths and weaknesses, they all have great potential to improve vaccine equality, particularly amid fast-developing and ever-evolving global health crises such as COVID-19. Furthermore, analyses show that, compared to vaccine empathy, vaccine diplomacy might be a more sustainable solution to improve vaccine donations mainly because of its deeper and stronger roots in multilateral collaboration and cooperation. Similar to penicillin, automated external defibrillators, or safety belts amid a roaring global health disaster, COVID-19 vaccines are, essentially, life-saving consumer health products that should be available to those who need them. Though man-made and complicated, vaccine inequality is nonetheless a solvable issue-gaps in vaccine distribution and dissemination can be effectively addressed by timely vaccine donations. Overall, our study underscores the instrumental and indispensable role of vaccine diplomacy in addressing the vaccine inequality issue amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its potentials for making even greater contributions in forging global solidarity amid international health emergencies. Future research could investigate approaches that could further inspire and improve vaccine donations among capable nations at a global scale to advance vaccine equity further.

摘要

疫苗不平等加剧了新冠疫情。为确保公平免疫,需要有疫苗同理心来促进有能力的国家增加疫苗捐赠。然而,围绕疫苗捐赠构建的有害叙事,如“疫苗外交”,可能会削弱各国捐赠疫苗的意愿,进而进一步加剧全球疫苗不平等。然而,尽管关于疫苗外交的讨论日益增多,但与之相关的研究却很有限,尤其是在其特征以及相对于疫苗同理心对疫苗分配的影响方面。因此,为填补这一研究空白,本研究旨在探讨疫苗外交的定义属性及其对新冠免疫的潜在影响,特别是从疫苗同理心的角度。进行了一项叙述性综述,以阐明疫苗外交在新冠疫苗分配和传播背景下的定义属性和影响。利用PubMed和Medline等数据库进行文献检索。此外,为确保综述纳入最新见解,还对谷歌学术中符合条件文章的参考文献列表进行了验证报告和反向追踪,以查找相关记录。疫苗同理心是个人或国家对其他个人或国家的疫苗需求表示同情的能力,而疫苗外交是一个国家旨在最终与其他国家建立互利关系的疫苗行动。我们的研究结果表明,虽然疫苗同理心和疫苗外交都有其优缺点,但它们都有极大潜力改善疫苗公平性,尤其是在像新冠疫情这样快速发展且不断演变的全球卫生危机期间。此外,分析表明,与疫苗同理心相比,疫苗外交可能是改善疫苗捐赠的更可持续解决方案,主要是因为它在多边协作与合作中有更深、更坚实的基础。与青霉素、自动体外除颤器或在肆虐的全球卫生灾难中的安全带一样,新冠疫苗本质上是拯救生命的消费健康产品,应该提供给有需要的人。尽管疫苗不平等是人为造成且复杂的,但它仍然是一个可解决的问题——疫苗分配和传播中的差距可以通过及时的疫苗捐赠得到有效解决。总体而言,我们的研究强调了疫苗外交在解决新冠疫情期间疫苗不平等问题中的重要且不可或缺的作用,以及它在国际卫生紧急情况下促进全球团结方面做出更大贡献的潜力。未来的研究可以探讨能够在全球范围内进一步激励和改善有能力国家疫苗捐赠以进一步推进疫苗公平性的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/8470866/b3a30d0c7112/vaccines-09-01024-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验