• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫苗捐赠——疫苗同理心还是疫苗外交?叙事性文献综述

COVID-19 Vaccine Donations-Vaccine Empathy or Vaccine Diplomacy? A Narrative Literature Review.

作者信息

Su Zhaohui, McDonnell Dean, Li Xiaoshan, Bennett Bindi, Šegalo Sabina, Abbas Jaffar, Cheshmehzangi Ali, Xiang Yu-Tao

机构信息

Center on Smart and Connected Health Technologies, Mays Cancer Center, School of Nursing, UT Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.

Department of Humanities, Institute of Technology, R93 V960 Carlow, Ireland.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;9(9):1024. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9091024.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines9091024
PMID:34579261
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8470866/
Abstract

Vaccine inequality inflames the COVID-19 pandemic. Ensuring equitable immunization, vaccine empathy is needed to boost vaccine donations among capable countries. However, damaging narratives built around vaccine donations such as "vaccine diplomacy" could undermine nations' willingness to donate their vaccines, which, in turn, further exacerbate global vaccine inequality. However, while discussions on vaccine diplomacy are on the rise, there is limited research related to vaccine diplomacy, especially in terms of its characteristics and effects on vaccine distribution vis-à-vis vaccine empathy. Thus, to bridge the research gap, this study aims to examine the defining attributes of vaccine diplomacy and its potential effects on COVID-19 immunization, particularly in light of vaccine empathy. A narrative review was conducted to shed light on vaccine diplomacy's defining attributes and effects in the context of COVID-19 vaccine distribution and dissemination. Databases such as PubMed and Medline were utilized for literature search. Additionally, to ensure up-to-date insights are included in the review, validated reports and reverse tracing of eligible articles' reference lists in Google Scholar have also been conducted to locate relevant records. Vaccine empathy is an individual or a nation's capability to sympathize with other individuals or nations' vaccine wants and needs, whereas vaccine diplomacy is a nation's vaccine efforts that aim to build mutually beneficial relationships with other nations ultimately. Our findings show that while both vaccine empathy and vaccine diplomacy have their strengths and weaknesses, they all have great potential to improve vaccine equality, particularly amid fast-developing and ever-evolving global health crises such as COVID-19. Furthermore, analyses show that, compared to vaccine empathy, vaccine diplomacy might be a more sustainable solution to improve vaccine donations mainly because of its deeper and stronger roots in multilateral collaboration and cooperation. Similar to penicillin, automated external defibrillators, or safety belts amid a roaring global health disaster, COVID-19 vaccines are, essentially, life-saving consumer health products that should be available to those who need them. Though man-made and complicated, vaccine inequality is nonetheless a solvable issue-gaps in vaccine distribution and dissemination can be effectively addressed by timely vaccine donations. Overall, our study underscores the instrumental and indispensable role of vaccine diplomacy in addressing the vaccine inequality issue amid the COVID-19 pandemic and its potentials for making even greater contributions in forging global solidarity amid international health emergencies. Future research could investigate approaches that could further inspire and improve vaccine donations among capable nations at a global scale to advance vaccine equity further.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/8470866/b3a30d0c7112/vaccines-09-01024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/8470866/b3a30d0c7112/vaccines-09-01024-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a185/8470866/b3a30d0c7112/vaccines-09-01024-g001.jpg
摘要

疫苗不平等加剧了新冠疫情。为确保公平免疫,需要有疫苗同理心来促进有能力的国家增加疫苗捐赠。然而,围绕疫苗捐赠构建的有害叙事,如“疫苗外交”,可能会削弱各国捐赠疫苗的意愿,进而进一步加剧全球疫苗不平等。然而,尽管关于疫苗外交的讨论日益增多,但与之相关的研究却很有限,尤其是在其特征以及相对于疫苗同理心对疫苗分配的影响方面。因此,为填补这一研究空白,本研究旨在探讨疫苗外交的定义属性及其对新冠免疫的潜在影响,特别是从疫苗同理心的角度。进行了一项叙述性综述,以阐明疫苗外交在新冠疫苗分配和传播背景下的定义属性和影响。利用PubMed和Medline等数据库进行文献检索。此外,为确保综述纳入最新见解,还对谷歌学术中符合条件文章的参考文献列表进行了验证报告和反向追踪,以查找相关记录。疫苗同理心是个人或国家对其他个人或国家的疫苗需求表示同情的能力,而疫苗外交是一个国家旨在最终与其他国家建立互利关系的疫苗行动。我们的研究结果表明,虽然疫苗同理心和疫苗外交都有其优缺点,但它们都有极大潜力改善疫苗公平性,尤其是在像新冠疫情这样快速发展且不断演变的全球卫生危机期间。此外,分析表明,与疫苗同理心相比,疫苗外交可能是改善疫苗捐赠的更可持续解决方案,主要是因为它在多边协作与合作中有更深、更坚实的基础。与青霉素、自动体外除颤器或在肆虐的全球卫生灾难中的安全带一样,新冠疫苗本质上是拯救生命的消费健康产品,应该提供给有需要的人。尽管疫苗不平等是人为造成且复杂的,但它仍然是一个可解决的问题——疫苗分配和传播中的差距可以通过及时的疫苗捐赠得到有效解决。总体而言,我们的研究强调了疫苗外交在解决新冠疫情期间疫苗不平等问题中的重要且不可或缺的作用,以及它在国际卫生紧急情况下促进全球团结方面做出更大贡献的潜力。未来的研究可以探讨能够在全球范围内进一步激励和改善有能力国家疫苗捐赠以进一步推进疫苗公平性的方法。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Vaccine Donations-Vaccine Empathy or Vaccine Diplomacy? A Narrative Literature Review.新冠疫苗捐赠——疫苗同理心还是疫苗外交?叙事性文献综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Sep 15;9(9):1024. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9091024.
2
Strengthening the COVID-19 pandemic response, global leadership, and international cooperation through global health diplomacy.通过全球卫生外交加强对新冠疫情的应对、全球领导力和国际合作。
Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Nov 7;10(4):300-305. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.48. eCollection 2020.
3
The rise of India's global health diplomacy amid COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间印度全球卫生外交的兴起。
Health Promot Perspect. 2023 Dec 16;13(4):290-298. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2023.34. eCollection 2023.
4
Prioritizing 'equity' in COVID-19 vaccine distribution through Global Health Diplomacy.通过全球卫生外交在新冠疫苗分配中优先考虑“公平”。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Aug 18;11(3):281-287. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.36. eCollection 2021.
5
COVID-19 Vaccine Diplomacy and Equitable Access to Vaccines Amid Ongoing Pandemic.COVID-19 疫苗外交与大流行期间公平获取疫苗
Arch Med Res. 2021 Oct;52(7):761-763. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
6
Global vaccine inequities and multilateralism amid COVID-19: Reconnaissance of Global Health Diplomacy as a panacea?新冠疫情期间的全球疫苗不平等与多边主义:将全球卫生外交视为万灵药的审视?
Health Promot Perspect. 2022 Dec 31;12(4):315-324. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2022.41. eCollection 2022.
7
COVID-19 Pandemic as an Excellent Opportunity for Global Health Diplomacy.COVID-19 大流行是全球卫生外交的绝佳机会。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jul 12;9:655021. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.655021. eCollection 2021.
8
Politics of disease control in Africa and the critical role of global health diplomacy: A systematic review.非洲疾病控制的政治与全球卫生外交的关键作用:一项系统综述。
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Feb 7;11(1):20-31. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.04. eCollection 2021.
9
COVID, Deglobalization and The Decline of Diplomacy: Could Tele-diplomacy Revitalize Diplomacy's Capacity to Promote Consensus?新冠疫情、去全球化与外交的衰落:远程外交能否重振外交促进共识的能力?
Glob Policy. 2021 Sep;12(4):574-576. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12961. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
10
Advancing African Medicines Agency through Global Health Diplomacy for an Equitable Pan-African Universal Health Coverage: A Scoping Review.通过全球卫生外交推进非洲药品管理局,实现公平的泛非全民健康覆盖:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211758.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 vaccines as a game-changing tool? A corpus-based study of vaccine communication in People's Daily and The New York Times.新冠疫苗是一种改变游戏规则的工具?一项基于语料库的《人民日报》与《纽约时报》疫苗相关报道研究
Heliyon. 2025 Jan 17;11(2):e42082. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42082. eCollection 2025 Jan 30.
2
A systemic evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination drives in LICs, LMICs, UMICs, and HICs: Preparedness for future pandemics.对低收入国家、中低收入国家、中高收入国家和高收入国家新冠疫苗接种行动的系统评估:对未来大流行的准备情况
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Dec;13(12):5680-5688. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_594_24. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Covid-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant.Covid-19 疫苗对 B.1.617.2(德尔塔)变异株的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):585-594. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108891. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
COVID-19 Vaccine Diplomacy and Equitable Access to Vaccines Amid Ongoing Pandemic.COVID-19 疫苗外交与大流行期间公平获取疫苗
Arch Med Res. 2021 Oct;52(7):761-763. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.04.006. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Experts criticise India's complacency over COVID-19.专家批评印度在新冠疫情上的自满态度。
Which roads lead to access? A global landscape of six COVID-19 vaccine innovation models.
哪些途径通向可及性?六种新冠疫苗创新模式的全球格局。
Global Health. 2024 Mar 26;20(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12992-024-01017-z.
4
Solidarity and reciprocity during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal qualitative interview study from Germany.《COVID-19 大流行期间的团结与互惠:来自德国的纵向定性访谈研究》。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17521-7.
5
Effectiveness of massage and range of motion exercises on muscle strength and intensive care unit-acquired weakness in Iranian patients with COVID-19: a randomized parallel-controlled trial.按摩与关节活动度训练对伊朗新冠肺炎患者肌肉力量及重症监护病房获得性肌无力的疗效:一项随机平行对照试验
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Feb;39(1):78-90. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.00416. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
On the momentum toward vaccine self-sufficiency in the BRICS: an integrative review of the role of pharmaceutical entrepreneurship and innovation.金砖国家向疫苗自给自足迈进的动力:制药创业和创新作用的综合回顾。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 9;11:1116092. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1116092. eCollection 2023.
7
Correlates of support for international vaccine solidarity during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-sectional survey evidence from Germany.在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持国际疫苗团结的相关因素:来自德国的横断面调查证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 23;18(6):e0287257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287257. eCollection 2023.
8
Politics matters for individual attitudes toward vaccine donation: cross-national evidence from the United States and Taiwan.政治因素影响个人对疫苗捐赠的态度:来自美国和中国台湾的跨国证据。
Global Health. 2023 Jun 20;19(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00940-x.
9
Fast Methods for Drug Approval: Research Perspectives for Pandemic Preparedness.快速药物审批方法:大流行防范的研究视角。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 29;20(3):2404. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032404.
10
Lockdown in Chinese university dormitories: Significant increase in negative feelings and time perception distortion.中国大学宿舍封控:负面情绪显著增加和时间感知扭曲
Psychol Sch. 2022 Dec 1. doi: 10.1002/pits.22833.
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1611-1612. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00993-4.
4
India's role in COVID-19 vaccine diplomacy.印度在新冠疫苗外交中的作用。
J Travel Med. 2021 Oct 11;28(7). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab064.
5
Rethinking and strengthening the Global Health Diplomacy through triangulated nexus between policy makers, scientists and the community in light of COVID-19 global crisis.从 COVID-19 全球危机的角度出发,重新思考和加强决策者、科学家和社区之间的三角关系,以实现全球卫生外交。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Apr 13;6(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00195-2.
6
Operation Warp Speed: implications for global vaccine security.“极速行动”:对全球疫苗安全的影响
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jul;9(7):e1017-e1021. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00140-6. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
Uncertainties over EU COVID-19 vaccine sharing scheme.欧盟新冠疫苗共享计划存在不确定性。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00721-2.
8
Global health diplomacy at the intersection of trade and health in the COVID-19 era.新冠疫情时代贸易与健康交叉领域的全球卫生外交
Health Promot Perspect. 2021 Feb 7;11(1):1-4. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.01. eCollection 2021.
9
U.S. public support for COVID-19 vaccine donation to low- and middle-income countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国公众在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持向低收入和中等收入国家捐赠 COVID-19 疫苗。
Vaccine. 2021 Apr 22;39(17):2452-2457. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.027. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
10
Covid-19: What do we know about Sputnik V and other Russian vaccines?新冠疫情:我们对“卫星V”疫苗及其他俄罗斯疫苗了解多少?
BMJ. 2021 Mar 19;372:n743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n743.