Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jun;40(6):654-664. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211045004. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
This study aimed to evaluate the environmental impact of 1000 kg h wheat straw to produce biofuel via fast pyrolysis with three different hydrogen production processes by the life cycle assessment (LCA) based on Chinese Life Cycle Database (CLCD). The primary energy depletion (PED), global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP) and respiratory inorganics (RI) impact categories of 1 MJ biofuel produced were employed for comparison. In case 1, the hydrogen was derived from natural gas steam reforming, and all the bio-oil was hydrotreated to produce the biofuel. In case 2, a part of the aqueous phase was reformed to produce hydrogen, whereas the remaining bio-oil was hydrotreated to produce biofuel. In case 3, all the aqueous phase of bio-oil was reformed to produce hydrogen, a part of hydrogen generated by reforming was used to oil phase hydrotreated and the excess hydrogen was considered as a co-product. Our results show that the PED, GWP, ADP and RI of case 3 are 0.1355 MJ, -17.96 g CO, 0.0338 g antimony and 0.0461 g PM2.5. Compared with conventional diesel, the PED, GWP, ADP and RI of case 3 were reduced by 89.81, 117.44, 1.74 and 85.03%, respectively. The results of sub-process contribution analysis and sensitivity analysis suggested that the electricity consumption for the bio-oil production has the maximal effect on the total PED, GWP and RI of case 3, whereas the amount of fertilizers in the biomass production sub-process has the maximal effect on the total ADP.
本研究旨在通过基于中国生命周期数据库(CLCD)的生命周期评估(LCA),评估通过快速热解用 1000 公斤小麦秸秆生产生物燃料的环境影响,该研究采用了三种不同的制氢工艺。比较了生产 1MJ 生物燃料的一次能源消耗(PED)、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、非生物资源消耗潜势(ADP)和呼吸无机污染物(RI)影响类别。在案例 1 中,氢气来源于天然气蒸汽重整,所有生物油都经过加氢处理以生产生物燃料。在案例 2 中,一部分水相被重整以生产氢气,而剩余的生物油则经过加氢处理以生产生物燃料。在案例 3 中,所有生物油的水相都被重整以生产氢气,一部分由重整产生的氢气用于油相加氢处理,多余的氢气被视为副产品。我们的结果表明,案例 3 的 PED、GWP、ADP 和 RI 分别为 0.1355MJ、-17.96g CO、0.0338g 锑和 0.0461g PM2.5。与传统柴油相比,案例 3 的 PED、GWP、ADP 和 RI 分别减少了 89.81%、117.44%、1.74%和 85.03%。子过程贡献分析和敏感性分析的结果表明,生物油生产的电力消耗对案例 3 的总 PED、GWP 和 RI 影响最大,而生物质生产子过程中化肥的用量对总 ADP 影响最大。