• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于生命周期评价的不同制氢工艺下小麦秸秆快速热解系统的环境影响比较。

Environmental impact comparison of wheat straw fast pyrolysis systems with different hydrogen production processes based on life cycle assessment.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jun;40(6):654-664. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211045004. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X211045004
PMID:34579599
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the environmental impact of 1000 kg h wheat straw to produce biofuel via fast pyrolysis with three different hydrogen production processes by the life cycle assessment (LCA) based on Chinese Life Cycle Database (CLCD). The primary energy depletion (PED), global warming potential (GWP), abiotic depletion potential (ADP) and respiratory inorganics (RI) impact categories of 1 MJ biofuel produced were employed for comparison. In case 1, the hydrogen was derived from natural gas steam reforming, and all the bio-oil was hydrotreated to produce the biofuel. In case 2, a part of the aqueous phase was reformed to produce hydrogen, whereas the remaining bio-oil was hydrotreated to produce biofuel. In case 3, all the aqueous phase of bio-oil was reformed to produce hydrogen, a part of hydrogen generated by reforming was used to oil phase hydrotreated and the excess hydrogen was considered as a co-product. Our results show that the PED, GWP, ADP and RI of case 3 are 0.1355 MJ, -17.96 g CO, 0.0338 g antimony and 0.0461 g PM2.5. Compared with conventional diesel, the PED, GWP, ADP and RI of case 3 were reduced by 89.81, 117.44, 1.74 and 85.03%, respectively. The results of sub-process contribution analysis and sensitivity analysis suggested that the electricity consumption for the bio-oil production has the maximal effect on the total PED, GWP and RI of case 3, whereas the amount of fertilizers in the biomass production sub-process has the maximal effect on the total ADP.

摘要

本研究旨在通过基于中国生命周期数据库(CLCD)的生命周期评估(LCA),评估通过快速热解用 1000 公斤小麦秸秆生产生物燃料的环境影响,该研究采用了三种不同的制氢工艺。比较了生产 1MJ 生物燃料的一次能源消耗(PED)、全球变暖潜势(GWP)、非生物资源消耗潜势(ADP)和呼吸无机污染物(RI)影响类别。在案例 1 中,氢气来源于天然气蒸汽重整,所有生物油都经过加氢处理以生产生物燃料。在案例 2 中,一部分水相被重整以生产氢气,而剩余的生物油则经过加氢处理以生产生物燃料。在案例 3 中,所有生物油的水相都被重整以生产氢气,一部分由重整产生的氢气用于油相加氢处理,多余的氢气被视为副产品。我们的结果表明,案例 3 的 PED、GWP、ADP 和 RI 分别为 0.1355MJ、-17.96g CO、0.0338g 锑和 0.0461g PM2.5。与传统柴油相比,案例 3 的 PED、GWP、ADP 和 RI 分别减少了 89.81%、117.44%、1.74%和 85.03%。子过程贡献分析和敏感性分析的结果表明,生物油生产的电力消耗对案例 3 的总 PED、GWP 和 RI 影响最大,而生物质生产子过程中化肥的用量对总 ADP 影响最大。

相似文献

1
Environmental impact comparison of wheat straw fast pyrolysis systems with different hydrogen production processes based on life cycle assessment.基于生命周期评价的不同制氢工艺下小麦秸秆快速热解系统的环境影响比较。
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jun;40(6):654-664. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211045004. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
2
Life cycle assessment of bio-based levoglucosan production from cotton straw through fast pyrolysis.棉秆通过快速热解生产生物基左旋葡聚糖的生命周期评估。
Bioresour Technol. 2020 Jul;307:123179. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123179. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
3
Life cycle environmental sustainability and cumulative energy assessment of biomass pellets biofuel derived from agroforest residues.农林剩余物生物质颗粒生物燃料的生命周期环境可持续性和累积能源评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0275005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275005. eCollection 2022.
4
A life cycle assessment of options for producing synthetic fuel via pyrolysis.通过热解生产合成燃料的方案的生命周期评估。
Bioresour Technol. 2018 Feb;249:626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.069. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Life cycle water footprint of hydrogenation-derived renewable diesel production from lignocellulosic biomass.氢化衍生的木质纤维素生物质可再生柴油生产的生命周期水足迹。
Water Res. 2016 Oct 1;102:330-345. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.06.045. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
6
Environmental evaluation of a distributed-centralized biomass pyrolysis system: A case study in Shandong, China.分布式-集中式生物质热解系统的环境评价:以中国山东为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 10;716:136915. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136915. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
7
Sustainable valorization of macroalgae residual biomass, optimization of pyrolysis parameters and life cycle assessment.可持续利用大型藻类残余生物质,优化热解参数和生命周期评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Apr 1;919:170797. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170797. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
8
Total environmental impacts of biofuels from corn stover using a hybrid life cycle assessment model combining process life cycle assessment and economic input-output life cycle assessment.使用结合过程生命周期评估和经济投入产出生命周期评估的混合生命周期评估模型对玉米秸秆生物燃料的总体环境影响。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2018 Jan;14(1):139-149. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1969. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Large-scale biohydrogen production from bio-oil.从生物油中大规模生产生物氢。
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Oct;101(19):7350-61. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.038. Epub 2010 May 7.
10
Dynamic life-cycle carbon analysis for fast pyrolysis biofuel produced from pine residues: implications of carbon temporal effects.基于松木残渣的快速热解生物燃料的动态生命周期碳分析:碳时间效应的影响
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021 Sep 29;14(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-02027-4.