Reinson Tina, Byrne Christopher D, Patel Janisha, El-Gohary Magdy, Moore Michael
Researcher, Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Professor of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
BJGP Open. 2021 Dec 14;5(6). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0145. Print 2021.
Liver fibrosis assessment services using transient elastography are growing in primary care. These services identify patients requiring specialist referral for liver fibrosis, and provide an opportunity for recommending lifestyle change. However, there are uncertainties regarding service design, effectiveness of advice given, and frequency of follow-up.
To assess the following: (a) effectiveness of standard care lifestyle advice for weight management and alcohol consumption; (b) uptake for liver rescan; and (c) usefulness of a 4.5-year time interval of rescanning in monitoring progression of liver fibrosis.
DESIGN & SETTING: Analysis of patient outcomes 4.5 years after the first 'liver service' attendance that included transient elastography in five GP practices in Southampton, UK.
Outcomes included weight, alcohol consumption, rescan uptake, time interval between scans, and change in liver fibrosis stage.
A total of 401 participants were recontacted. Mean standard deviation (± SD) weight loss was 1.2 kg±8.4 kg ( = 0.005); Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) grade increased by 7.8% ( ≤0.001). A total of = 116/401 participants were eligible for liver rescanning and = 59/116 (50.9%) agreed to undergo rescanning. Mean ± SD time interval between scans was 53.6±3.4 months. Liver fibrosis progressed from mild (≥6.0 kPa-8.1 kPa) to significant fibrosis (8.2 kPa-9.6 kPa) in 3.4% of patients; from mild to advanced fibrosis (9.7 kPa-13.5 kPa) and cirrhosis (≥13.6 kPa) in 15.3% of patients, and did not progress in 81.3%. No baseline factors were independently associated with liver fibrosis progression at follow-up.
Rescan recall attendance and adherence to lifestyle changes needs improving. Optimum time interval between scans remains uncertain. After a mean interval of 53.6 months between scans, and with no specific predictors indicated, a substantial minority (18.7%) experienced a deterioration in fibrosis grade.
在基层医疗中,使用瞬时弹性成像技术进行肝纤维化评估的服务正在不断增加。这些服务可识别需要转介至专科医生处进行肝纤维化治疗的患者,并提供了一个建议生活方式改变的机会。然而,在服务设计、所提供建议的有效性以及随访频率方面仍存在不确定性。
评估以下内容:(a) 关于体重管理和饮酒的标准护理生活方式建议的有效性;(b) 肝脏重新扫描的接受率;(c) 在监测肝纤维化进展中,4.5年的重新扫描时间间隔的有用性。
对英国南安普敦市5家全科医生诊所中首次接受包括瞬时弹性成像在内的“肝脏服务”4.5年后的患者结局进行分析。
结局指标包括体重、饮酒量、重新扫描接受率、扫描间隔时间以及肝纤维化阶段的变化。
共再次联系到401名参与者。平均体重减轻标准差(±SD)为1.2 kg±8.4 kg(P = 0.005);酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)评分增加了7.8%(P≤0.001)。共有n = 116/401名参与者符合肝脏重新扫描条件,其中n = 59/116(50.9%)同意接受重新扫描。扫描间隔的平均±SD时间为53.6±3.4个月。3.4%的患者肝纤维化从轻度(≥6.0 kPa - 8.1 kPa)进展为显著纤维化(8.2 kPa - 9.6 kPa);15.3%的患者从轻度进展为晚期纤维化(9.7 kPa - 13.5 kPa)和肝硬化(≥13.6 kPa),81.3%的患者未进展。随访时,没有基线因素与肝纤维化进展独立相关。
重新扫描的召回率和对生活方式改变的依从性需要提高。扫描的最佳时间间隔仍不确定。在平均扫描间隔53.6个月后,且无特定预测指标显示的情况下,仍有相当一部分(18.7%)患者的纤维化等级恶化。