Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
APMIS. 2021 Nov;129(11):641-652. doi: 10.1111/apm.13181. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
Brain abscesses are often polymicrobial and of unclear primary origin. Here, we compare the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology with classical microbiological diagnostics for identification of clinically relevant microorganisms and describe the microbiome profiling with respect to the primary source of brain abscess. Thirty-six samples from 36 patients, with primary brain abscesses, were subjected to both culture- and 16S/18S rRNA Sanger sequencing-based diagnostics ("standard methods") and compared to a 16S/18S amplicon-based NGS, which were also subjected to a microbiome diversity analyses. Forty-seven species were identified with "standard methods" compared to 96 species with NGS, both confirming and adding to the number of species identified (p < 0.05). The variation of the brain abscess microbiome diversity was not continuous but could be stratified comparing the presumable origin of infection ("dental," "sinus," "disseminated," or "unknown"). Alpha diversity did not differ (p > 0.05) between groups while beta diversity differed significantly (p = 0.003) comparing disseminated vs the other presumable origin of infection. Interesting, clustering was also detected between "dental" and "sinusitis," although not significantly (p = 0.07). Microbiome-based diagnostics can increase sensitivity without losing specificity. The bacterial beta diversity differed between the presumably origin of the brain abscess and might help to clarify the primary source of infection.
脑脓肿通常为多种微生物感染,且原发灶不明。在此,我们比较了下一代测序(NGS)技术与传统微生物诊断学,以鉴定与临床相关的微生物,并描述脑脓肿原发灶的微生物组特征。对 36 例原发性脑脓肿患者的 36 个样本同时进行培养和 16S/18S rRNA Sanger 测序(“标准方法”)以及 16S/18S 扩增子 NGS 检测,并对微生物组多样性进行分析。“标准方法”共鉴定出 47 个种,NGS 则鉴定出 96 个种,均确认并增加了鉴定出的种数(p<0.05)。脑脓肿微生物组多样性的变化并非连续的,而是可以通过比较感染的推测来源(“牙源性”、“鼻窦源性”、“播散性”或“未知”)进行分层。各组之间的 alpha 多样性无差异(p>0.05),但 beta 多样性差异显著(p=0.003),播散性与其他推测的感染源相比差异显著。有趣的是,尽管无统计学意义(p=0.07),但在“牙源性”和“鼻窦炎”之间也检测到聚类。基于微生物组的诊断可以提高敏感性而不降低特异性。推测的脑脓肿来源之间的细菌 beta 多样性存在差异,可能有助于阐明感染的原发灶。