Habis Ralph, Canales Melissa, Beekmann Susan E, Polgreen Philip M, Thakur Kiran T, Gea-Banacloche Juan, Tunkel Allan R, Bodilsen Jacob, Venkatesan Arun
Johns Hopkins Encephalitis Center, Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 6;12(8):ofaf358. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf358. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Variability in causative agents, host factors, and management complexity and the lack of clear guidelines in the United States hinder the standardization of brain abscess (BA) care. This survey examines US infectious disease (ID) specialists' perspectives on BA care, comparing practice settings and identifying key areas for future studies and guideline development.
A multidisciplinary team of neurologists and ID physicians developed a 10-item online survey that was validated via a focus group and distributed to 1486 ID specialists in the Infectious Diseases Society of America's Emerging Infections Network from 7 September to 2 October 2023.
Of the 551 respondents (37% response rate), 116 (21%) opted out due to noninvolvement in BA cases, leaving 435 completed surveys. The most common empiric treatment (53%) consisted of third-generation cephalosporin, metronidazole, and vancomycin. Imaging at treatment completion was supported by 67%, and 75% recommended a 6- to 8-week intravenous antibiotic course. Neurosurgical intervention was primarily pursued to identify pathogens and confirm the diagnosis. Molecular diagnostics were variably used, with broad-spectrum polymerase chain reaction being the most commonly utilized test. Transitioning to oral antibiotics before 6 weeks was favored by 40%, while only 18% recommended postintravenous oral consolidation therapy. Notably, 91% endorsed the need for BA management guidelines.
This study highlights a lack of consensus and significant variations in BA management, suggesting that current practices rely heavily on expert opinion rather than standardized protocols. These findings emphasize the need for further studies and US-specific guidelines to complement efforts of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases and establish a more comprehensive, globally applicable standard of care.
在美国,病原体、宿主因素和管理复杂性的差异以及缺乏明确的指南阻碍了脑脓肿(BA)治疗的标准化。本调查探讨了美国传染病(ID)专家对BA治疗的看法,比较了不同的实践环境,并确定了未来研究和指南制定的关键领域。
一个由神经科医生和ID医生组成的多学科团队开发了一项包含10个项目的在线调查,该调查通过焦点小组进行了验证,并于2023年9月7日至10月2日分发给美国传染病学会新兴感染网络中的1486名ID专家。
在551名受访者(回复率37%)中,116人(21%)因未参与BA病例而选择退出,剩下435份完成的调查问卷。最常见的经验性治疗(53%)包括第三代头孢菌素、甲硝唑和万古霉素。67%的人支持在治疗结束时进行影像学检查,75%的人建议静脉使用抗生素疗程为6至8周。神经外科干预主要是为了确定病原体并确诊。分子诊断方法的使用各不相同,广谱聚合酶链反应是最常用的检测方法。40%的人赞成在6周前过渡到口服抗生素,而只有18%的人建议静脉注射后进行口服巩固治疗。值得注意的是,91%的人认可需要BA管理指南。
本研究强调了在BA管理方面缺乏共识和显著差异,表明当前的实践严重依赖专家意见而非标准化方案。这些发现强调需要进一步研究和制定美国特定的指南,以补充欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会的工作,并建立更全面、全球适用的护理标准。