• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥本哈根 Amager Bakke 焚烧厂的碳捕获和储存的环境评估。

Environmental assessment of amending the Amager Bakke incineration plant in Copenhagen with carbon capture and storage.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.

Amager Resource Center, Copenhagen S, Denmark.

出版信息

Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jan;40(1):79-95. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211048125. Epub 2021 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1177/0734242X211048125
PMID:34585637
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8832551/
Abstract

Amending municipal solid waste incineration with carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a new approach that can reduce the climate change impacts of waste incineration. This study provides a detailed analysis of the consequences of amending the new Amager Bakke incinerator in Copenhagen (capacity: 600,000 tonnes waste per year) with CCS as a post-combustion technology. Emphasis is on the changes in the energy flows and outputs as well as the environmental performance of the plant; the latter is assessed by life cycle assessment. Amending Amager Bakke with CCS of the chosen configuration reduces the electricity output by 50% due to steam use by the capture unit, but introducing post-capture flue gas condensation increases the heat output utilized in the Copenhagen district heating system by 20%. Thus, the overall net energy efficiency is not affected. The CCS amendment reduces the fossil CO emissions to 40 kg CO per tonne of incinerated waste and stores 530 kg biogenic CO per tonne of incinerated waste. Potential developments in the composition of the residual waste incinerated or in the energy systems that Amager Bakke interacts with, do not question the benefits of the CCS amendment. In terms of climate change impacts, considering different waste composition and energy system scenarios, introducing CCS reduces in average the impact of Amager Bakke by 850 kg CO-equivalents per tonne of incinerated waste. CCS increases the environmental impacts in other categories, but not in the same order of magnitude as the savings introduced within climate change.

摘要

对城市固体废物焚烧进行碳捕集与封存(CCS)改造是一种新的方法,可以减少废物焚烧对气候变化的影响。本研究对哥本哈根新的 Amager Bakke 焚烧炉(年处理能力 60 万吨废物)采用 CCS 作为后燃烧技术进行改造的后果进行了详细分析。重点是能源流动和输出以及工厂的环境性能的变化;后者通过生命周期评估进行评估。采用选定配置的 CCS 对 Amager Bakke 进行改造,由于捕集单元的蒸汽使用,电力输出减少了 50%,但引入后捕集烟道气冷凝,使哥本哈根区域供热系统利用的热量增加了 20%。因此,整体净能源效率不受影响。CCS 改造将化石 CO 排放量减少到每吨焚烧废物 40 公斤 CO,并储存每吨焚烧废物 530 公斤生物源 CO。剩余废物焚烧或与 Amager Bakke 相互作用的能源系统组成的潜在变化不会质疑 CCS 改造的好处。就气候变化影响而言,考虑到不同的废物组成和能源系统情景,引入 CCS 平均可使每吨焚烧废物的 Amager Bakke 影响减少 850 公斤 CO 当量。CCS 会增加其他类别中的环境影响,但在气候变化范围内引入的节约措施不在同一数量级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/a0bed940919f/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/123370ae65a0/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/f0f53403378f/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/9ae8c00d9b4c/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/be9653065699/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/a0bed940919f/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/123370ae65a0/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/f0f53403378f/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/9ae8c00d9b4c/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/be9653065699/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cfa/8832551/a0bed940919f/10.1177_0734242X211048125-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental assessment of amending the Amager Bakke incineration plant in Copenhagen with carbon capture and storage.哥本哈根 Amager Bakke 焚烧厂的碳捕获和储存的环境评估。
Waste Manag Res. 2022 Jan;40(1):79-95. doi: 10.1177/0734242X211048125. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
2
Environmental assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a post-treatment technology in waste incineration.环境评估碳捕获和储存(CCS)作为垃圾焚烧的后处理技术。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.046. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Climate change impacts of introducing carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) in waste incineration.在垃圾焚烧中引入碳捕集与利用(CCU)对气候变化的影响。
Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:754-770. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.评估英国城市固体废物能源回收的环境可持续性。
Waste Manag. 2016 Apr;50:346-63. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.010. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
5
Environmental impacts of residual municipal solid waste incineration: a comparison of 110 French incinerators using a life cycle approach.城市生活垃圾焚烧残余物的环境影响:使用生命周期方法对 110 座法国焚烧炉的比较。
Waste Manag. 2013 Dec;33(12):2781-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
6
The study on biomass fraction estimate methodology of municipal solid waste incinerator in Korea.韩国城市固体废弃物焚烧炉生物质比例估算方法的研究
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2016 Oct;66(10):971-7. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2016.1185479.
7
Environmental evaluation of the electric and cogenerative configurations for the energy recovery of the Turin municipal solid waste incineration plant.都灵市生活垃圾焚烧厂能量回收的电力和热电联产配置的环境评估
Waste Manag Res. 2014 Jul;32(7):670-80. doi: 10.1177/0734242X14538304. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
8
Climate Change Impact of the Development in Household Waste Management in China.中国家庭废物管理发展的气候变化影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Jun 21;56(12):8993-9002. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07921. Epub 2022 May 12.
9
An LCA model for waste incineration enhanced with new technologies for metal recovery and application to the case of Switzerland.一种通过金属回收新技术强化的垃圾焚烧生命周期评估模型及其在瑞士案例中的应用。
Waste Manag. 2014 Feb;34(2):378-89. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.019. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Life cycle assessment of alternative biogas utilisations, including carbon capture and storage or utilisation.替代沼气利用的生命周期评估,包括碳捕获和储存或利用。
Waste Manag. 2023 Feb 15;157:168-179. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.005. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective environmental burdens and benefits of fast-swing direct air carbon capture and storage.快速摆动式直接空气碳捕集与封存的预期环境负担和效益
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 17;14(1):16549. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66990-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Life cycle assessment of air-pollution-control residues from waste incineration in Europe: Importance of composition, technology and long-term leaching.欧洲垃圾焚烧空气污染控制残留物的生命周期评估:组成、技术和长期浸出的重要性。
Waste Manag. 2022 May 1;144:336-348. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.032. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Environmental assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) as a post-treatment technology in waste incineration.环境评估碳捕获和储存(CCS)作为垃圾焚烧的后处理技术。
Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.046. Epub 2021 May 8.
3
Climate change impacts of introducing carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) in waste incineration.
在垃圾焚烧中引入碳捕集与利用(CCU)对气候变化的影响。
Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:754-770. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Application of LCA modelling in integrated waste management.生命周期评估模型在综合废物管理中的应用。
Waste Manag. 2020 Dec;118:313-322. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.08.034. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Biogenic carbon in combustible waste: waste composition, variability and measurement uncertainty.可燃废物中的生物成因碳:废物组成、变异性和测量不确定性。
Waste Manag Res. 2013 Oct;31(10 Suppl):56-66. doi: 10.1177/0734242X13502387. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
6
Incineration and co-combustion of waste: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions.焚烧和废物共燃烧:温室气体核算和全球变暖贡献。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):789-99. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09343774. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
7
C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems.生命周期评估模型中废物管理系统的碳平衡、二氧化碳排放和全球变暖潜能值。
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Nov;27(8):707-15. doi: 10.1177/0734242X08096304. Epub 2009 May 7.