Suppr超能文献

句子过度学习后语言神经生物学的重组。

Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning.

机构信息

Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

London Interdisciplinary Biosciences Consortium, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2022 May 31;32(11):2447-2468. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab354.

Abstract

It is assumed that there are a static set of "language regions" in the brain. Yet, language comprehension engages regions well beyond these, and patients regularly produce familiar "formulaic" expressions when language regions are severely damaged. These suggest that the neurobiology of language is not fixed but varies with experiences, like the extent of word sequence learning. We hypothesized that perceiving overlearned sentences is supported by speech production and not putative language regions. Participants underwent 2 sessions of behavioral testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). During the intervening 15 days, they repeated 2 sentences 30 times each, twice a day. In both fMRI sessions, they "passively" listened to those sentences, novel sentences, and produced sentences. Behaviorally, evidence for overlearning included a 2.1-s decrease in reaction times to predict the final word in overlearned sentences. This corresponded to the recruitment of sensorimotor regions involved in sentence production, inactivation of temporal and inferior frontal regions involved in novel sentence listening, and a 45% change in global network organization. Thus, there was a profound whole-brain reorganization following sentence overlearning, out of "language" and into sensorimotor regions. The latter are generally preserved in aphasia and Alzheimer's disease, perhaps explaining residual abilities with formulaic expressions in both.

摘要

人们假设大脑中有一组静态的“语言区域”。然而,语言理解涉及的区域远不止这些,而且当语言区域受到严重损伤时,患者经常会产生熟悉的“惯用”表达。这些表明语言的神经生物学并不是固定的,而是随着经验而变化,例如词序学习的程度。我们假设感知过度学习的句子是由言语产生而不是所谓的语言区域支持的。参与者接受了 2 次行为测试和功能磁共振成像 (fMRI) 测试。在这 15 天的间隔中,他们每天重复 2 次,每次重复 30 遍。在这两个 fMRI 会话中,他们“被动”听那些句子、新句子和自己产生的句子。过度学习的证据包括对过度学习句子的最后一个单词的反应时间减少了 2.1 秒。这对应于参与句子产生的感觉运动区域的募集,参与新句子听力的颞叶和下额叶区域的失活,以及全局网络组织的 45%变化。因此,在句子过度学习后,大脑进行了深刻的全脑重组,从“语言”区域进入感觉运动区域。这些区域通常在失语症和阿尔茨海默病中保留下来,这也许可以解释这两种疾病中惯用表达的残留能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3695/9157312/713b3bab9809/bhab354f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning.
Cereb Cortex. 2022 May 31;32(11):2447-2468. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab354.
2
An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
Cortex. 2016 Jun;79:57-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.014. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
3
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
4
No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows.
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:116925. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116925. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.042.
7
Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke.
Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):242-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt289. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
8
The anatomy of language: a review of 100 fMRI studies published in 2009.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Mar;1191:62-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05444.x.
9
Fluency-dependent cortical activation associated with speech production and comprehension in second language learners.
Neuroscience. 2015 Aug 6;300:474-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.05.045. Epub 2015 May 27.
10
Neural networks for sentence comprehension and production: An ALE-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Jun 1;40(8):2275-2304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24523. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Whole-Brain Dimensions of Intrinsic Connectivity Capture Modality-Specific and Heteromodal Language Representations.
J Neurosci. 2025 May 28;45(22):e1876242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-24.2025.
2
Language is widely distributed throughout the brain.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 Mar;26(3):189. doi: 10.1038/s41583-024-00903-0.
3
When abstract becomes concrete, naturalistic encoding of concepts in the brain.
Elife. 2024 Dec 5;13:RP91522. doi: 10.7554/eLife.91522.
4
Quantitative MRI reveals differences in striatal myelin in children with DLD.
Elife. 2022 Sep 27;11:e74242. doi: 10.7554/eLife.74242.

本文引用的文献

2
A naturalistic neuroimaging database for understanding the brain using ecological stimuli.
Sci Data. 2020 Oct 13;7(1):347. doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-00680-2.
3
Moving beyond the dual stream account of language.
Brain. 2020 Aug 1;143(8):2336-2338. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa197.
4
Structural white matter connectometry of word production in aphasia: an observational study.
Brain. 2020 Aug 1;143(8):2532-2544. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa193.
5
Auditory representation of learned sound sequences in motor regions of the macaque brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 30;117(26):15242-15252. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915610117. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
6
Formulaic Language Resources May Help Overcome Difficulties in Speech-Motor Planning after Stroke.
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0233608. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233608. eCollection 2020.
7
Metrics for graph comparison: A practitioner's guide.
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0228728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228728. eCollection 2020.
9
The super-learning hypothesis: Integrating learning processes across cortex, cerebellum and basal ganglia.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 May;100:19-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
10
Clinical, Anatomical, and Pathological Features in the Three Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Review.
Front Neurol. 2018 Aug 21;9:692. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00692. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验