• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内在连接性的全脑维度捕捉特定模态和跨模态语言表征。

Whole-Brain Dimensions of Intrinsic Connectivity Capture Modality-Specific and Heteromodal Language Representations.

作者信息

Marin-Marin Lidon, Eisenhauer Susanne, Gonzalez Alam Tirso R J, Margulies Daniel S, Smallwood Jonathan, Jefferies Elizabeth

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5NA, United Kingdom

York Neuroimaging Centre, Innovation Way, York YO10 5NY, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2025 May 28;45(22):e1876242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-24.2025.

DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-24.2025
PMID:40306960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12121703/
Abstract

Comprehension of spoken and written language involves a hierarchical sequence of modality-specific and heteromodal processes. While these have been localized to different regions, modality-selective responses extend beyond them, implicating large-scale network organization in language comprehension. Dimensions of whole-brain connectivity, derived from intrinsic activity, have been proposed as a general organizing framework for cognition. Here, we test their utility in accounting for the spatial distribution of task-evoked activity during language comprehension. We investigated brain activity in human males and females in response to psycholinguistic variables linked to input processing and meaning in a sentence comprehension task presented both visually and auditorily. Macroscale patterns of brain activity were similar across modalities for sentence-level and semantic variables, but effects of orthographic and phonological distance were negatively correlated between modalities. The first dimension, separating heteromodal and unimodal cortices, showed no differences across modalities for sentence processing and semantic variables and opposite effects of word length and orthographic/phonological distance for spoken and written words, supporting the notion that higher-order processing requires heteromodal resources different to those linked to input processing. The second dimension, separating auditory-motor and visual processes, showed an asymmetry in the recruitment of the unimodal systems-listening to long and semantically dissimilar words involved stronger recruitment of primary auditory-motor regions and low visual engagement. These findings show that the language system is organized according to large-scale axes of intrinsic connectivity, with psycholinguistic processes varying systematically along whole-brain dimensions. This supports the view that language comprehension reflects general principles of cortical organization.

摘要

对口语和书面语言的理解涉及一系列特定模态和跨模态的分层过程。虽然这些过程已被定位到不同区域,但模态选择性反应超出了这些区域,这表明在语言理解中存在大规模的网络组织。源自内在活动的全脑连接维度已被提出作为认知的一般组织框架。在这里,我们测试它们在解释语言理解过程中任务诱发活动的空间分布方面的效用。我们在男性和女性中研究了大脑活动,这些活动是对与输入处理和句子理解任务中的意义相关的心理语言学变量的反应,该任务以视觉和听觉方式呈现。对于句子层面和语义变量,跨模态的大脑活动宏观模式相似,但正字法和语音距离的影响在不同模态之间呈负相关。将跨模态和单模态皮层分开的第一维度在句子处理和语义变量的跨模态方面没有差异,并且对于口语和书面单词,单词长度和正字法/语音距离的影响相反,这支持了高阶处理需要与输入处理相关的不同跨模态资源的观点。将听觉运动和视觉过程分开的第二维度在单模态系统的征募方面表现出不对称性——听长且语义不同的单词涉及更强的初级听觉运动区域征募和较低的视觉参与度。这些发现表明,语言系统是根据内在连接的大规模轴组织的,心理语言学过程沿全脑维度系统地变化。这支持了语言理解反映皮层组织一般原则的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/396dfb805a91/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/e9f25375c00e/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/3bfd3d3b8075/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/6d886cf79b34/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/396dfb805a91/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/e9f25375c00e/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/3bfd3d3b8075/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/6d886cf79b34/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7d14/12121703/396dfb805a91/jneuro-45-e1876242025-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Whole-Brain Dimensions of Intrinsic Connectivity Capture Modality-Specific and Heteromodal Language Representations.内在连接性的全脑维度捕捉特定模态和跨模态语言表征。
J Neurosci. 2025 May 28;45(22):e1876242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1876-24.2025.
2
A Heteromodal Word-Meaning Binding Site in the Visual Word Form Area under Top-Down Frontoparietal Control.顶叶顶间控制下的视觉词形区中的异模态词义绑定位点。
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 28;41(17):3854-3869. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2771-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient.个体单词的表示形式沿着皮质单模态到异模态梯度与语言语境分离。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26607. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26607.
4
Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: an fMRI study.通过耳和眼实现句子处理的统一:一项 fMRI 研究。
Cortex. 2011 Apr;47(4):416-31. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.005. Epub 2010 Jan 11.
5
Modality independence of word comprehension.词汇理解的模态独立性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Aug;16(4):251-61. doi: 10.1002/hbm.10054.
6
Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.句子理解中的意象:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.042.
7
Sensory Modality-Independent Activation of the Brain Network for Language.感觉模态独立激活语言的大脑网络。
J Neurosci. 2020 Apr 1;40(14):2914-2924. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2271-19.2020. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
The Domain-General Multiple Demand (MD) Network Does Not Support Core Aspects of Language Comprehension: A Large-Scale fMRI Investigation.域泛型多重需求(MD)网络并不支持语言理解的核心方面:一项大规模 fMRI 研究。
J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 3;40(23):4536-4550. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2036-19.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
9
The Representation of Semantic Information Across Human Cerebral Cortex During Listening Versus Reading Is Invariant to Stimulus Modality.在听和读两种模式下,人类大脑皮层对语义信息的表示在刺激方式上是不变的。
J Neurosci. 2019 Sep 25;39(39):7722-7736. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0675-19.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
10
On-line orthographic influences on spoken language in a semantic task.语义任务中在线正字法对口语的影响。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jan;21(1):169-79. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21014.

本文引用的文献

1
Macroscale brain states support the control of semantic cognition.宏观脑状态支持语义认知的控制。
Commun Biol. 2024 Aug 1;7(1):926. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06630-7.
2
Individual word representations dissociate from linguistic context along a cortical unimodal to heteromodal gradient.个体单词的表示形式沿着皮质单模态到异模态梯度与语言语境分离。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Feb 1;45(2):e26607. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26607.
3
Supramodal Sentence Processing in the Human Brain: fMRI Evidence for the Influence of Syntactic Complexity in More Than 200 Participants.
人类大脑中的跨模态句子处理:超过200名参与者的功能磁共振成像证据表明句法复杂性的影响
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Sep 29;3(4):575-598. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00076. eCollection 2022.
4
Flexing the principal gradient of the cerebral cortex to suit changing semantic task demands.灵活调整大脑皮层的主梯度以适应不断变化的语义任务需求。
Elife. 2022 Sep 28;11:e80368. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80368.
5
Modulation of brain activity by psycholinguistic information during naturalistic speech comprehension and production.心理语言学信息在自然语言理解和产生过程中对大脑活动的调节。
Cortex. 2022 Oct;155:287-306. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
6
Individual differences in gradients of intrinsic connectivity within the semantic network relate to distinct aspects of semantic cognition.语义网络中内在连通性梯度的个体差异与语义认知的不同方面相关。
Cortex. 2022 May;150:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2022.01.019. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
7
Similar neural networks respond to coherence during comprehension and production of discourse.类似的神经网络在理解和生成话语时对连贯性做出反应。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 Sep 19;32(19):4317-4330. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab485.
8
Reorganization of the Neurobiology of Language After Sentence Overlearning.句子过度学习后语言神经生物学的重组。
Cereb Cortex. 2022 May 31;32(11):2447-2468. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhab354.
9
A tale of two gradients: differences between the left and right hemispheres predict semantic cognition.左右半球的梯度差异:预测语义认知的差异。
Brain Struct Funct. 2022 Mar;227(2):631-654. doi: 10.1007/s00429-021-02374-w. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
10
Comparing predictors of sentence self-paced reading times: Syntactic complexity versus transitional probability metrics.比较句子自定阅读时间的预测指标:句法复杂度与过渡概率指标。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254546. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254546. eCollection 2021.