Suppr超能文献

初级保健评估工具:基于巴西地理与统计研究所国家健康调查的地区差异。

Primary Care Assessment Tool: regional differences based on the National Health Survey from Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística.

机构信息

Departamento de Medicina em Atenção Primária à Saúde, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. Rua Laura de Araujo 36 2º andar parte, Cidade Nova, 21250-540. Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil.

Programa de Pós-Graduação em Epidemiologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brasil.

出版信息

Cien Saude Colet. 2021 Sep;26(9):3965-3979. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021269.10112021. Epub 2021 May 8.

Abstract

In 2019, unprecedentedly among the official statistical institutes worldwide, the IBGE included a particular module on evaluating primary health care in its central population-based population survey, the National Health Survey (PNS-2019). The survey considered the reduced version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT), developed and disseminated by Starfield and Shi, to assess the existence and extent of the structure and process characteristics of PHC services. It is the most significant probabilistic sample using this instrument ever conducted in a single country in the world that interviewed users aged 18 or over (n=9,677). The results of the Brazilian overall PCAT scores (5.9 [5.8; 5.9]) point to significant regional and intraregional contrasts, with the South of the country standing out with the best evaluations of primary care services (overall score = 6.3 [6.2; 6.5]) and the North with the worse (overall score = 5,5 [5,3; 5,7]). There were also statistically significant and more favorable differences between residents of households registered by family health teams, among older adults, and those using health services the most (adults with reported morbidities).

摘要

2019 年,巴西地理统计局(IBGE)在全球官方统计机构中史无前例地在其核心基于人口的全国健康调查(PNS-2019)中纳入了一个特别模块,用于评估初级卫生保健。该调查采用了 Starfield 和 Shi 开发和传播的简化版初级保健评估工具(PCAT)来评估初级卫生保健服务的结构和过程特征的存在和程度。这是世界上任何一个国家使用该工具进行的最大的概率抽样调查,调查了 18 岁及以上的用户(n=9677)。巴西整体 PCAT 得分(5.9[5.8;5.9])的结果表明存在显著的地区和区域内差异,该国南部的初级保健服务评估最好(整体得分=6.3[6.2;6.5]),而北部则最差(整体得分=5.5[5.3;5.7])。家庭健康团队登记的家庭居民、老年人以及最常使用卫生服务(有报告疾病的成年人)之间也存在统计学上显著且更有利的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验