Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA, D5-22098109, USA.
University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Oct;16(5):1149-1164. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01105-8. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
Young adult (YA) cancer survivors have high rates of adverse health and psychosocial outcomes. This risk-stratified, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) compared a self-management survivorship intervention to usual care in YA survivors with symptoms of cancer-related distress, insomnia, fatigue, pain, and/or depression.
Eligibility included age 18-39 at diagnosis with an invasive malignancy in the previous 1-5 years. Baseline assessment determined "high need" participants, with 2-5 elevated targeted symptoms. We randomized high need participants to intervention or usual care and offered intervention participants a survivorship clinic visit, which included mutually decided action plans for symptoms. Follow-up calls at 1 and 3 months after the clinic visit reviewed action plan progress. Outcomes compared rates of improved symptoms for intervention vs usual care at 6 months and 12 months.
N = 344 completed baseline assessment, with n = 147 (43%) categorized as high need and randomized. Of n = 73 randomized to the intervention, n = 42 (58%) did not attend their survivorship clinic visit. In intent-to-treat analyses, aggregate symptom scores did not differ between arms, though distress improved for 46% in the intervention arm at 6 months compared to 18% in usual care (p = 0.03) among those with elevated distress at baseline.
Distress improved for YAs who received self-management survivorship care. However, the study demonstrates a need for alternative strategies for providing YA survivorship care.
NCT02192333 IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: While YA survivors demonstrate some improved distress when provided survivorship care, to make care accessible and effective, they require options such as remote delivery of care.
青年癌症幸存者(YA)存在较高的不良健康和心理社会结局风险。这项风险分层、多中心、随机对照试验(RCT)比较了自我管理生存干预与 YA 幸存者的常规护理,这些幸存者有癌症相关困扰、失眠、疲劳、疼痛和/或抑郁的症状。
入选标准为诊断时年龄在 18-39 岁,且在过去 1-5 年内患有侵袭性恶性肿瘤。基线评估确定了“高需求”参与者,他们有 2-5 种升高的靶向症状。我们将高需求参与者随机分配到干预组或常规护理组,并为干预组参与者提供生存诊所就诊,其中包括针对症状的共同决定行动计划。在诊所就诊后 1 个月和 3 个月进行随访电话,以了解行动计划的进展。在 6 个月和 12 个月时比较干预组和常规护理组症状改善的比率。
共有 344 名参与者完成了基线评估,其中 147 名(43%)被归类为高需求并随机分组。在随机分配到干预组的 73 名参与者中,有 42 名(58%)未参加生存诊所就诊。在意向治疗分析中,两组的综合症状评分没有差异,但在基线时存在升高的困扰的参与者中,干预组有 46%的人在 6 个月时的困扰得到改善,而常规护理组为 18%(p=0.03)。
接受自我管理生存护理的 YA 患者的困扰得到了改善。然而,该研究表明需要为 YA 提供生存护理的替代策略。
NCT02192333
虽然 YA 幸存者在接受生存护理时表现出一些困扰的改善,但为了使护理能够获得并有效,他们需要诸如远程护理等选择。