Cleveland Clinic Epilepsy Center, Cleveland, OH.
Departments of Medicine and Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, CWRU and Population Health Research Institute, The MetroHealth System, and Center for Health Care Research and Policy, CWRU - MetroHealth, Cleveland, OH.
Ann Neurol. 2021 Dec;90(6):927-939. doi: 10.1002/ana.26238. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
The aim was to compare the outcomes of subdural electrode (SDE) implantations versus stereotactic electroencephalography (SEEG), the 2 predominant methods of intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) performed in difficult-to-localize drug-resistant focal epilepsy.
The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy created an international registry of iEEG patients implanted between 2005 and 2019 with ≥1 year of follow-up. We used propensity score matching to control exposure selection bias and generate comparable cohorts. Study endpoints were: (1) likelihood of resection after iEEG; (2) seizure freedom at last follow-up; and (3) complications (composite of postoperative infection, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or permanent neurological deficit).
Ten study sites from 7 countries and 3 continents contributed 2,012 patients, including 1,468 (73%) eligible for analysis (526 SDE and 942 SEEG), of whom 988 (67%) underwent subsequent resection. Propensity score matching improved covariate balance between exposure groups for all analyses. Propensity-matched patients who underwent SDE had higher odds of subsequent resective surgery (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05, 1.84) and higher odds of complications (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.34, 3.74; unadjusted: 9.6% after SDE vs 3.3% after SEEG). Odds of seizure freedom in propensity-matched resected patients were 1.66 times higher (95% CI 1.21, 2.26) for SEEG compared with SDE (unadjusted: 55% seizure free after SEEG-guided resections vs 41% after SDE).
In comparison to SEEG, SDE evaluations are more likely to lead to brain surgery in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy but have more surgical complications and lower probability of seizure freedom. This comparative-effectiveness study provides the highest feasible evidence level to guide decisions on iEEG. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:927-939.
比较硬脑膜下电极(SDE)植入与立体定向脑电图(SEEG)这两种在局灶性耐药性癫痫中进行颅内脑电图(iEEG)的主要方法的结果。
国际抗癫痫联盟的外科治疗委员会创建了一个 iEEG 患者的国际登记处,这些患者在 2005 年至 2019 年间接受了至少 1 年的随访。我们使用倾向评分匹配来控制暴露选择偏倚并生成可比队列。研究终点为:(1)iEEG 后切除的可能性;(2)最后一次随访时的无癫痫发作率;和(3)并发症(包括术后感染、症状性颅内出血或永久性神经功能缺损的复合)。
来自 7 个国家和 3 个大洲的 10 个研究地点贡献了 2012 名患者,其中 1468 名(73%)符合分析条件(526 名 SDE 和 942 名 SEEG),其中 988 名(67%)接受了后续切除。倾向评分匹配改善了暴露组之间所有分析的协变量平衡。接受 SDE 的倾向评分匹配患者随后行切除术的可能性更高(优势比[OR] = 1.4,95%置信区间[CI] 1.05,1.84),且并发症的可能性更高(OR = 2.24,95%CI 1.34,3.74;未调整:SDE 后为 9.6%,SEEG 后为 3.3%)。与 SDE 相比,在倾向评分匹配的切除患者中,SEEG 引导的切除后癫痫无发作的可能性高 1.66 倍(95%CI 1.21,2.26;未调整:SEEG 引导的切除后 55%无癫痫发作,SDE 后为 41%)。
与 SEEG 相比,SDE 评估更有可能导致耐药性癫痫患者进行脑部手术,但并发症更多,癫痫无发作的可能性更低。这项比较有效性研究提供了最高可行的证据水平,以指导 iEEG 的决策。