• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evidence on scaling in health and social care: protocol for a living umbrella review.卫生和社会保健中的规模证据:活体伞式综述议定书。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;10(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01813-3.
2
Evidence on Scaling in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review.卫生和社会保健中的扩展规模证据:伞式综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):881-921. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
3
Strategies for involving patients and the public in scaling-up initiatives in health and social services: protocol for a scoping review and Delphi survey.参与健康和社会服务扩大计划的患者和公众的策略:范围综述和德尔菲调查的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 11;10(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01597-6.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Protocol for a systematic review of living labs in healthcare.医疗保健领域中的 living labs 系统评价议定书。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e039246. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039246.
7
Identifying indicators sensitive to primary healthcare nurse practitioner practice: a review of systematic reviews protocol.识别对初级保健执业护士实践敏感的指标:系统评价方案综述
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 6;11(1):e043213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043213.
8
Social network interventions in mental healthcare: a protocol for an umbrella review.社交网络干预在精神卫生保健中的应用:一项伞式评价研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e052831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052831.
9
Management strategies for patients with subclinical hypothyroidism: a protocol for an umbrella review.亚临床甲状腺功能减退症患者的管理策略:伞式评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 1;10(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01842-y.
10
The role of academic health centres in building equitable health systems: a systematic review protocol.学术健康中心在构建公平卫生系统中的作用:一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 May 29;7(5):e015435. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015435.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Evidence-Synthesis for School-Based Obesity Prevention Interventions. Comment on Ginell et al. Unreliable Findings Due to Miscalculations and Errors. Comment on "Nally et al. The Effectiveness of School-Based Interventions on Obesity-Related Behaviours in Primary School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. 2021, , 489".改善基于学校的肥胖预防干预措施的证据综合。对吉内尔等人的评论。由于计算错误和失误导致的不可靠结果。对“纳利等人。基于学校的干预措施对小学生肥胖相关行为的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。2021年,,489”的评论。
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;11(8):959. doi: 10.3390/children11080959.
2
Informing the development of the SUCCEED reporting guideline for studies on the scaling of health interventions: A systematic review.为健康干预措施推广研究制定 SUCCEED 报告指南:系统评价。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 16;103(7):e37079. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037079.
3
Evidence on Scaling in Health and Social Care: An Umbrella Review.卫生和社会保健中的扩展规模证据:伞式综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):881-921. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12649. Epub 2023 Apr 25.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of costing studies for implementing and scaling-up breastfeeding interventions: what do we know and what are the gaps?系统评价实施和扩大母乳喂养干预措施的成本研究:我们了解什么,有哪些差距?
Health Policy Plan. 2020 May 1;35(4):461-501. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa005.
2
Essential items for reporting of scaling studies of health interventions (SUCCEED): protocol for a systematic review and Delphi process.健康干预措施定标研究报告的基本要素(SUCCEED):系统评价和德尔菲法的议定书。
Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 11;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1258-3.
3
Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation.生活系统评价的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法评估的结果。
Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 14;8(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1248-5.
4
Factors influencing the scale-up of public health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative systematic literature review.影响中低收入国家公共卫生干预措施推广的因素:定性系统文献综述。
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Mar 1;35(2):219-234. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz140.
5
Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements.满足审稿人需求:探索审稿类型及相关信息检索要求。
Health Info Libr J. 2019 Sep;36(3):202-222. doi: 10.1111/hir.12276.
6
Spread tools: a systematic review of components, uptake, and effectiveness of quality improvement toolkits.传播工具:质量改进工具包的组成部分、采用情况和效果的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 19;14(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0929-8.
7
Spreading and scaling up innovation and improvement.推广和扩大创新和改进。
BMJ. 2019 May 10;365:l2068. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2068.
8
Scaling-up evidence-based obesity interventions: A systematic review assessing intervention adaptations and effectiveness and quantifying the scale-up penalty.扩大基于证据的肥胖干预措施的规模:一项系统评价,评估干预措施的适应性和有效性,并量化规模扩大的代价。
Obes Rev. 2019 Jul;20(7):964-982. doi: 10.1111/obr.12845. Epub 2019 Mar 13.
9
Effective strategies for scaling up evidence-based practices in primary care: a systematic review.在基层医疗中推广基于证据的实践的有效策略:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 22;12(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0672-y.
10
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.

卫生和社会保健中的规模证据:活体伞式综述议定书。

Evidence on scaling in health and social care: protocol for a living umbrella review.

机构信息

VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Pavillon Landry-Poulin - 2525, Chemin de la Canardière, Quebec, QC, Canada.

Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 30;10(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01813-3.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-021-01813-3
PMID:34593027
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8485425/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing interest in scaling effective health innovations to promote equitable access to high-quality health services worldwide. However, multiple challenges persist in scaling innovations. In this study, we aim to summarize the scaling evidence in the health and social care literature and identify current knowledge gaps.

METHODS

We will conduct a living umbrella review according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual. We will consider all knowledge syntheses addressing scaling in health or social care (e.g., any setting, any clinical area) and conducted in a systematic way. We will search the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, PsychINFO (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Sociological Abstract (Proquest), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO), and Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global, from inception. Furthermore, we will conduct searches of the grey literature. No restriction regarding date or language will be applied. Each phase of the review will be processed by two independent reviewers. We will develop a data extraction form on Covidence. We will assess the methodological quality of the included reviews using AMSTAR2 and the risk of bias using ROBIS. Results will be presented in tabular form and accompanied by a narrative synthesis covering the traditional themes of scaling science that emerge from the analysis, such as coverage, range, and sustainability, as well as themes less covered in the literature, including reporting guidance, models, tools, barriers, and/or facilitators to scaling innovations, evidence regarding application in high-income or low-income countries, and end-user engagement. We will disseminate the findings via publications and through relevant networks.

DISCUSSION

The findings of the umbrella review will facilitate access to scaling evidence in the literature and help strengthen the science of scaling for researchers, policy makers, and program managers. Finally, this work will highlight important knowledge gaps and help prioritize future research questions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on November 11, 2020 (registration number: CRD42020183774 ).

摘要

背景

人们越来越关注扩大有效卫生创新的规模,以促进全球公平获得高质量的卫生服务。然而,在扩大创新方面仍然存在多重挑战。在本研究中,我们旨在总结卫生和社会保健文献中关于扩大规模的证据,并确定当前的知识差距。

方法

我们将根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所评论员手册进行一项正在进行的伞式综述。我们将考虑所有以系统方式解决卫生或社会保健扩大规模问题的知识综合(例如,任何环境、任何临床领域)。我们将检索以下电子数据库:MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase、PsychINFO(Ovid)、CINAHL(EBSCO)、Web of Science、The Cochrane Library、Sociological Abstract(Proquest)、Academic Search Premier(EBSCO)和 Proquest Dissertations & Theses Global,从一开始。此外,我们将对灰色文献进行搜索。不限制日期或语言。审查的每个阶段都将由两名独立的评论员进行处理。我们将在 Covidence 上开发一个数据提取表格。我们将使用 AMSTAR2 评估纳入的综述的方法学质量,并使用 ROBIS 评估偏倚风险。结果将以表格形式呈现,并附有叙述性综合,涵盖从分析中出现的扩大科学的传统主题,例如覆盖范围、范围和可持续性,以及文献中较少涵盖的主题,包括报告指南、模型、工具、扩大创新的障碍和/或促进因素、在高收入或低收入国家的应用证据,以及最终用户的参与。我们将通过出版物和相关网络传播研究结果。

讨论

伞式综述的结果将有助于在文献中获取扩大规模的证据,并帮助研究人员、政策制定者和项目管理人员加强扩大规模的科学。最后,这项工作将突出重要的知识差距,并有助于确定未来的研究问题。

系统评价注册

本方案于 2020 年 11 月 11 日在国际前瞻性系统评价登记库(PROSPERO)进行了注册(登记号:CRD42020183774)。