Suppr超能文献

改善基于学校的肥胖预防干预措施的证据综合。对吉内尔等人的评论。由于计算错误和失误导致的不可靠结果。对“纳利等人。基于学校的干预措施对小学生肥胖相关行为的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。2021年,,489”的评论。

Improving Evidence-Synthesis for School-Based Obesity Prevention Interventions. Comment on Ginell et al. Unreliable Findings Due to Miscalculations and Errors. Comment on "Nally et al. The Effectiveness of School-Based Interventions on Obesity-Related Behaviours in Primary School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. 2021, , 489".

作者信息

Shrewsbury Vanessa A, Taylor Rachael M, Jakstas Tammie, Verdonschot Angeliek, Collins Clare E

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.

Food and Nutrition Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 9;11(8):959. doi: 10.3390/children11080959.

Abstract

As researchers with substantial experience in the child obesity field [...].

摘要

作为在儿童肥胖领域拥有丰富经验的研究人员[...]。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Conducting umbrella reviews.开展综合性述评。
BMJ Med. 2022 Nov 22;1(1):e000071. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000071. eCollection 2022.
6
The problems with systematic reviews: a living systematic review.系统评价的问题:一项实时的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;156:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.01.011. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验