Gaete-Silva Joaquin, Gaete Alfredo
Werklund School of Education, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Calgary Family Therapy Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;12:740856. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740856. eCollection 2021.
Responding to disruptive behavior has become increasingly problematic in current Westernized societies, impacting people's well-being globally. In the context of the current Special Issue, in this article, we advance the concept of (PDB) as a suitable "window" to better understand some aspects of the deep interdependence of social participation, citizenship, justice, and well-being. To do so, we also advance the notion of to account both for the apparent rise of problematic disruptive experiences, and the increased social conflict within which such experiences get often entangled. More specifically, we argue that formerly morally acceptable responses to problematic disruption, such as punishment and discipline, have lost social legitimacy and, to that extent, they aggravate the problems they were intended to resolve. We provide a genealogical account of the surge of such postdisciplinary order with a focus on the moral transition on ideas of justice, of personal entitlements, and authority. We conclude outlining an alternative way to respond to disruptive behaviors that we anticipate will be both more effective and acceptable in the current postdisciplinary milieu.
在当前的西方化社会中,应对破坏性行为已变得越来越成问题,对全球人们的福祉产生影响。在本期特刊的背景下,在本文中,我们提出了 “问题性破坏行为”(PDB)这一概念,作为一个合适的“窗口”,以更好地理解社会参与、公民身份、正义和福祉之间深度相互依存关系的某些方面。为此,我们还提出了“后纪律秩序”的概念,以解释有问题的破坏性行为经历明显增加的现象,以及此类经历常常卷入其中的社会冲突加剧的现象。更具体地说,我们认为,以前对问题性破坏行为的道德上可接受的应对方式,如惩罚和纪律处分,已经失去了社会合法性,在这个程度上,它们加剧了原本想要解决的问题。我们对这种后纪律秩序的兴起进行了谱系学分析,重点关注正义观念、个人权利和权威方面的道德转变。我们最后概述了一种应对破坏性行为的替代方式,我们预计这种方式在当前的后纪律环境中将更有效且更可接受。