Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
the Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Anesthesiology. 2021 Dec 1;135(6):1076-1090. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003999.
Mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients remains high. Although randomized controlled trials must continue to definitively evaluate treatments, further hypothesis-generating efforts to identify candidate treatments are required. This study's hypothesis was that certain treatments are associated with lower COVID-19 mortality.
This was a 1-yr retrospective cohort study involving all COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units in six hospitals affiliated with Yale New Haven Health System from February 13, 2020, to March 4, 2021. The exposures were any COVID-19-related pharmacologic and organ support treatments. The outcome was in-hospital mortality.
This study analyzed 2,070 patients after excluding 23 patients who died within 24 h after intensive care unit admission and 3 patients who remained hospitalized on the last day of data censoring. The in-hospital mortality was 29% (593 of 2,070). Of 23 treatments analyzed, apixaban (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.363 to 0.48; corrected CI, 0.336 to 0.52) and aspirin (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.87; corrected CI, 0.54 to 0.96) were associated with lower mortality based on the multivariable analysis with multiple testing correction. Propensity score-matching analysis showed an association between apixaban treatment and lower mortality (with vs. without apixaban, 27% [96 of 360] vs. 37% [133 of 360]; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.337 to 0.69) and an association between aspirin treatment and lower mortality (with vs. without aspirin, 26% [121 of 473] vs. 30% [140 of 473]; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.78). Enoxaparin showed similar associations based on the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.97; corrected CI, 0.61 to 1.05) and propensity score-matching analysis (with vs. without enoxaparin, 25% [87 of 347] vs. 34% [117 of 347]; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.367 to 0.77).
Consistent with the known hypercoagulability in severe COVID-19, the use of apixaban, enoxaparin, or aspirin was independently associated with lower mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
危重症 COVID-19 患者的死亡率仍然很高。虽然随机对照试验必须继续明确评估治疗方法,但仍需要进一步提出假设来确定候选治疗方法。本研究的假设是某些治疗方法与 COVID-19 死亡率降低有关。
这是一项为期 1 年的回顾性队列研究,涉及耶鲁纽黑文健康系统六家附属医院 2020 年 2 月 13 日至 2021 年 3 月 4 日期间入住重症监护病房的所有 COVID-19 患者。暴露因素为任何 COVID-19 相关的药物治疗和器官支持治疗。结局为院内死亡率。
本研究排除了 24 小时内入住重症监护病房后死亡的 23 例患者和最后一天数据截止时仍住院的 3 例患者后,共分析了 2070 例患者。院内死亡率为 29%(2070 例患者中有 593 例死亡)。在分析的 23 种治疗方法中,阿哌沙班(风险比,0.42;95%置信区间,0.363 至 0.48;校正置信区间,0.336 至 0.52)和阿司匹林(风险比,0.72;95%置信区间,0.60 至 0.87;校正置信区间,0.54 至 0.96)与多变量分析校正后较低的死亡率相关。倾向评分匹配分析显示,阿哌沙班治疗与较低的死亡率相关(阿哌沙班组与无阿哌沙班组相比,死亡率分别为 27%[360 例中的 96 例]和 37%[360 例中的 133 例];风险比,0.48;95%置信区间,0.337 至 0.69),阿司匹林治疗与较低的死亡率相关(阿司匹林组与无阿司匹林组相比,死亡率分别为 26%[473 例中的 121 例]和 30%[473 例中的 140 例];风险比,0.57;95%置信区间,0.41 至 0.78)。依诺肝素基于多变量分析(风险比,0.82;95%置信区间,0.69 至 0.97;校正置信区间,0.61 至 1.05)和倾向评分匹配分析(依诺肝素组与无依诺肝素组相比,死亡率分别为 25%[347 例中的 87 例]和 34%[347 例中的 117 例];风险比,0.53;95%置信区间,0.367 至 0.77)也显示出类似的关联。
与严重 COVID-19 中的已知高凝状态一致,阿哌沙班、依诺肝素或阿司匹林的使用与危重症 COVID-19 患者的死亡率降低独立相关。