Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.

Automated driving is a developing trend that is coming to the consumer market, and conditionally automated driving (CAD) is anticipated to become the primary automated driving system. For enhancing both the comfort and security of human drivers in self-driving cars, the most significant concern of CAD is ensuring that not only can the driver conduct non-driving related tasks (NDRT) while automated driving is in progress, but also quickly and competently take over when the system reaches a limit and issues a takeover request (TOR). However, the level of distraction by NDRTs may affect the transition from automated driving to the human driver taking over. The focus of the present study was allowing a driver immersed in NDRTs to discover the TOR and take control of the driving quickly. A 3×2×2 factor experimental design was used: vehicle display interface information load (basic vs. prediction vs. advanced prediction interfaces); TOR information load (directional vs. non-directional information notifications); and degree of NDRT immersion (not performing vs. performing an NDRT when TOR prompt was issued). 48 participants were recruited, and different automotive display interfaces were used as TOR prompts with different information loads during driving to analyze the takeover behavior, performance, and subjective perception of the drivers, who were immersed in a smartphone-related task. The takeover process out of NDRT immersion was found to be more efficient with the advanced prediction interface, compared to the other two interfaces. All groups achieved faster takeovers and demonstrated better takeover performance if given directional rather than non-directional information, regardless of interface type or NDRT immersion.