• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我思故我为:批判性思维能力对 COVID-19 大流行期间信任和行为的影响。

I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2022 May;42(5):1073-1085. doi: 10.1111/risa.13833. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

DOI:10.1111/risa.13833
PMID:34601741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8662233/
Abstract

Actively open-minded thinking (AOT) operates in three dimensions: it serves as a norm accounting for how one should search for and use information in judgment and decision making; it is a thinking style that one may adopt in accordance with the norm; and it sets standards for evaluating the thinking of others, particularly the trustworthiness of sources that claim authority. With the first and third dimensions in mind, we explore how AOT influences trust in public health experts, risk perceptions, and compliance with recommended behaviors aimed at slowing the spread and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using survey data from a nationally representative sample of Americans (N = 857), we tested whether AOT will lead people to place greater trust public health experts (H1). Because these experts have been consistently messaging that COVID-19 is a real and serious threat to public health, we also hypothesized that trust in experts would be positively associated with high perceived risk (H2), which should have a positive influence on (self-reported) compliance with CDC recommendations (H3). And because AOT is a self-directed thinking style, we also expected it to directly influence risk perceptions and, by extension, compliance (H4). Our results support all four hypotheses. We discuss the implications of these results for how risk communication and risk management efforts are designed and practiced.

摘要

积极开放思维(AOT)在三个维度上运作:它作为一种规范,说明在判断和决策中应该如何搜索和使用信息;它是一种人们可以根据规范采用的思维方式;它为评估他人的思维设定了标准,特别是对声称具有权威性的信息源的可信度的评估。考虑到第一维和第三维,我们探讨了 AOT 如何影响对公共卫生专家的信任、风险感知以及对旨在减缓 COVID-19 大流行传播和严重程度的建议行为的遵守。我们使用来自全美代表性样本的调查数据(N=857),检验了 AOT 是否会导致人们更加信任公共卫生专家(H1)。由于这些专家一直在传达 COVID-19 对公共卫生是真实而严重的威胁,我们还假设对专家的信任将与高感知风险呈正相关(H2),这应该对(自我报告的)CDC 建议的遵守产生积极影响(H3)。由于 AOT 是一种自我导向的思维方式,我们还预计它会直接影响风险感知,进而影响遵守(H4)。我们的结果支持这四个假设。我们讨论了这些结果对如何设计和实施风险沟通和风险管理工作的影响。

相似文献

1
I Think, Therefore I Act: The Influence of Critical Reasoning Ability on Trust and Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic.我思故我为:批判性思维能力对 COVID-19 大流行期间信任和行为的影响。
Risk Anal. 2022 May;42(5):1073-1085. doi: 10.1111/risa.13833. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
I think, therefore I act, Revisited: Building a stronger foundation for risk analysis.《反思“我思,故我行”:为风险分析构建更坚实的基础》
Risk Anal. 2024 Mar;44(3):513-520. doi: 10.1111/risa.14177. Epub 2023 Jun 18.
3
Trust in COVID-19 information sources and perceived risk among smokers: A nationally representative survey.信任 COVID-19 信息源与吸烟者感知风险:一项全国代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262097. eCollection 2022.
4
Actively open-minded thinking in politics.积极开放的政治思维。
Cognition. 2019 Jul;188:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
5
Analyzing Risk Communication, Trust, Risk Perception, Negative Emotions, and Behavioral Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China Using a Structural Equation Model.采用结构方程模型分析中国 COVID-19 大流行期间的风险沟通、信任、风险感知、负面情绪和行为应对策略。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 30;10:843787. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.843787. eCollection 2022.
6
Perceived Effectiveness of COVID-19 Preventive Practices and Behavioral Intention: Survey of a Representative Adult Sample in the United States.美国代表性成人样本对 COVID-19 预防措施的感知效果和行为意向:一项调查。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Oct 10;10:e39919. doi: 10.2196/39919.
7
Trust in experts, not trust in national leadership, leads to greater uptake of recommended actions during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间,信任专家而非信任国家领导人会导致对推荐行动的更多采用。
Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy. 2021 Sep;12(3):283-302. doi: 10.1002/rhc3.12219. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
8
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
9
Exploring predictors of Australian community members' blood donation intentions and blood donation-related behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.探究澳大利亚社区成员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的献血意愿及其与献血相关行为的预测因素。
Transfusion. 2020 Dec;60(12):2907-2917. doi: 10.1111/trf.16067. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
10
Risk Perception and Preventive Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic : Testing the Effects of Government Trust and Information Behaviors.新冠疫情期间的风险感知与预防行为:检验政府信任与信息行为的影响。
Health Commun. 2024 Apr;39(2):376-387. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2166698. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of actively open-minded thinking in willingness to take civic and political action on genome-edited food in the United States and Switzerland.积极开放的思维在美国和瑞士针对基因编辑食品采取公民及政治行动的意愿中所起的作用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 2;16:1565928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1565928. eCollection 2025.
2
Communicating COVID-19 vaccine information to Chinese communities in the UK: a qualitative study of their knowledge, information sources and trust.向英国华人社区传播新冠疫苗信息:关于其知识、信息来源及信任度的定性研究
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;2(2):e000658. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000658. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Trust as a catalyst: revealing the impact of government trust and professional trust on public health policy compliance during a pandemic.信任作为催化剂:揭示大流行期间政府信任和专业信任对公众遵守公共卫生政策的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 4;24(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18449-2.
4
Investigating the relationship of actively open-minded thinking in future time perspectives among Saudi undergraduate students.调查沙特本科大学生未来时间视角下积极开放思维的关系。
Psychol Res. 2024 Feb;88(1):222-237. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01851-7. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
5
Risk, Obligation, and Public Noncompliance with Mobility Directives in China during the COVID-19 Pandemic.风险、义务与新冠疫情期间中国公众对出行限制令的不遵守
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 13;19(18):11505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811505.

本文引用的文献

1
Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures.世界观、信任和风险认知影响公众对 COVID-19 公共卫生措施的接受程度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100411118.
2
Comparative systematic review and meta-analysis of reactogenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2.针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗的反应原性、免疫原性和效力的比较系统评价与荟萃分析
NPJ Vaccines. 2021 May 13;6(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s41541-021-00336-1.
3
Mental associations with COVID-19 and how they relate with self-reported protective behaviors: A national survey in the United States.与 COVID-19 相关的心理联想及其与自我报告的保护行为的关系:美国的一项全国性调查。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;275:113825. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113825. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
4
The Impact of Trust and Risk Perception on the Acceptance of Measures to Reduce COVID-19 Cases.信任和风险感知对减少 COVID-19 病例措施接受度的影响。
Risk Anal. 2021 May;41(5):787-800. doi: 10.1111/risa.13675. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
5
Airborne transmission of COVID-19 and the role of face mask to prevent it: a systematic review and meta-analysis.空气传播的 COVID-19 及其预防方法:口罩的作用——系统综述和荟萃分析。
Eur J Med Res. 2021 Jan 2;26(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40001-020-00475-6.
6
Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.家庭传播的 SARS-CoV-2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2031756. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31756.
7
Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world.世界各地对新冠疫情错误信息的易感性。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Oct 14;7(10):201199. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201199. eCollection 2020 Oct.
8
Comparison of influenza type A and B with COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings.甲型和乙型流感与 COVID-19 的比较:基于临床、实验室和影像学表现的全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Rev Med Virol. 2021 May;31(3):e2179. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2179. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research.风险认知:对40年研究的反思
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2191-2206. doi: 10.1111/risa.13599. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
10
An Analysis of Government Communication in the United States During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Effective Government Health Risk Communication.新冠疫情期间美国政府沟通分析:有效政府健康风险沟通的建议
World Med Health Policy. 2020 Dec;12(4):398-412. doi: 10.1002/wmh3.363. Epub 2020 Aug 27.