Suppr超能文献

后循环血管内卒中治疗期间的镇静模式——对符合条件的患者进行清醒镇静是否可行?

Sedation Mode During Endovascular Stroke Treatment in the Posterior Circulation-Is Conscious Sedation for Eligible Patients Feasible?

作者信息

Weyland Charlotte Sabine, Chen Min, Potreck Arne, Jäger Laura Bettina, Seker Fatih, Schönenberger Silvia, Bendszus Martin, Möhlenbruch Markus

机构信息

Neurologische Klinik, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 17;12:711558. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.711558. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

To compare safety and efficacy of conscious sedation (CS) vs. general anesthesia (GA) in endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of the posterior circulation (PC). Retrospective single-center analysis of patients receiving EST for large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in PC between January 2015 and November 2020. Exclusion criteria were severe stroke syndromes (NIHSS > 20), decreased level of consciousness, intubation for transport, and second stroke within 3 months of follow-up. The primary endpoint was a favorable clinical outcome 90 days after stroke onset (mRS 0-2 or 3 if pre-stroke mRS 3). Secondary endpoints were the rate of EST failure and procedural complications. Of 111 included patients, 45/111 patients (40.5%) were treated under CS and 60/111 (54.0%) under GA. In 6/111 cases (5.4%), sedation mode was changed from CS to GA during EST. Patients treated under CS showed a lower mRS 90 days after stroke onset [mRS, median (IQR): 2.5 (1-4) CS vs. 3 (2-6) GA, = 0.036] and a comparable rate of good outcome [good outcome, (%): 19 (42.2) CS vs. 15 (32.6) GA, = 0.311]. There was no difference in complication rates during EST (6.7% CS vs. 8.3% GA) or intracranial bleeding in follow-up imaging [ (%): 4 (8.9) CS vs. 7 (11.7) GA), = 0.705]. The rate of successful target vessel recanalization did not differ (84.4% CS vs. 85.0 % GA). In this retrospective study, EST of the posterior circulation under conscious sedation was for eligible patients comparably safe and effective to patients treated under general anesthesia.

摘要

比较清醒镇静(CS)与全身麻醉(GA)在后循环(PC)血管内卒中治疗(EST)中的安全性和有效性。对2015年1月至2020年11月期间因PC区大血管闭塞(LVO)接受EST治疗的患者进行回顾性单中心分析。排除标准为严重卒中综合征(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分>20)、意识水平下降、转运时插管以及随访3个月内发生第二次卒中。主要终点是卒中发作90天后的良好临床结局(改良Rankin量表评分0 - 2分,若卒中前改良Rankin量表评分为3分则评分为3分)。次要终点是EST失败率和手术并发症。在纳入的111例患者中,45/111例患者(40.5%)接受CS治疗,60/111例患者(54.0%)接受GA治疗。在6/111例(5.4%)病例中,EST期间镇静模式从CS改为GA。接受CS治疗的患者在卒中发作90天后改良Rankin量表评分较低[改良Rankin量表评分,中位数(四分位间距):CS组为2.5(1 - 4),GA组为3(2 - 6),P = 0.036],且良好结局率相当[良好结局,(%):CS组为19(42.2),GA组为15(32.6),P = 0.311]。EST期间并发症发生率无差异(CS组为6.7%,GA组为8.3%),随访影像学检查中颅内出血发生率也无差异[(%):CS组为4(8.9),GA组为7(11.7),P = 0.705]。目标血管成功再通率无差异(CS组为84.4%,GA组为85.0%)。在这项回顾性研究中,对于符合条件的患者,后循环EST在清醒镇静下与全身麻醉下治疗同样安全有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e6/8484320/65f6086e416b/fneur-12-711558-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验